- ±àºÅ£º29599
- ÊéÃû£ºÓ¢ÃÀ·¨¾µäÅÐÀýÑ¡¶Á-ÃÀ¹úÇÖȨ·¨(¸ßµÈԺУ·¨ÂÉÓ¢ÓïÍÆ¼ö¶ÁÎï)
- ×÷ÕߣºÉê¼Î±àÒë
- ³ö°æÉ磺ÃñÖ÷·¨ÖÆ
- ³ö°æÊ±¼ä£º2007Äê5ÔÂ
- Èë¿âʱ¼ä£º2007-6-16
- ¶¨¼Û£º15
ͼÊéÄÚÈݼò½é
ºÎΪÇÖȨ?ÔÚÃÀ¹úÇÖȨ·¨ÖУ¬²¢Ã»ÓÐÒ»¸ö±ê×¼´ð°¸¡£²»Í¬µÄ¶¨ÒåÃè»æ
ÁËÇÖȨµÄ²»Í¬‚ÈÃæ¡£ÈçÔÚÊ®°ËÊÀ¼ÍÖкóÆÚ£¬Ó¢¹úÖøÃû·¨¹ÙÍþÁ®¡£²¼À³¿Ë˹
ͨ(William Blackstone)Ìá³ö£ºÇÖȨÊÇ¡°·ÇÒòºÏͬ¶ø²úÉúµÄ·ÇÐÌÊÂÇÖº¦¡±¡£
Õâ±íÃ÷ÇÖȨÊÇÒ»ÖÖÃñʹý´í£¬Í¬ÐÌÊ·¸×ïÏàÇø±ð£»Í¬Ê±ÕâÖÖ¹ý´í²»ÊÇ»ùÓÚ
ºÏͬ£¬¶øÊÇ»ùÓÚÆäËûÔÒò£¬Í¬µ±ÊÂÈ˵ĺÏÒâÐÐΪÏàÇø±ð¡£°®µÃ»ª¡£¿Ë¶÷¿¨
(Edward J£®Kionka)½ÌÊÚÔÚ¡¶ÇÖȨ·¨¼ò½é¡·(Torts in a Nutshell)ÖÐÌá³ö£®
¡°ÇÖȨÊÇÒ»¸öÈ˵ÄÃñʹý´íÒýÆð¶ÔËûÈËÈËÉí¡¢²Æ²ú»òÀûÒæ¿ÉÒÔ²¹³¥µÄÉ˺¦£¬
ÕâÖÖÐÐΪΥ·´ÁË·¨Âɹ涨µÄÔðÈΡ£¡±¸Ã¶¨ÒåÇ¿µ÷ÁËÇÖȨ¸øËûÈËÔì³ÉÁËÉ˺¦£¬
Î¥·´ÁËÐÐΪÈËÓ¦¸Ã³Ðµ£µÄ·¨¶¨ÔðÈΣ¬ÕâÖÖÉ˺¦ÊÇ¿ÉÒԵõ½²¹³¥µÄ¡£
ͼÊéĿ¼
µÚÒ»Õ ÃÀ¹úÇÖȨÔðÈη¨¸ÅÊö¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 1
µÚ¶þÕ ¹ÊÒâÇÖȨ¡¡¡¡¡¡6
2.1 ¹ÊÒâµÄ¸ÅÄî¡¡¡¡¡¡ 6
2.2 ¶ÔÈËÉíµÄ¹ÊÒâÇÖȨ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 6
Case 1 PICARDv. BARRY PONTIAC-BUICK, INC ¡¡¡¡7
Case 2 DUPLER v. SEUBERT 12
Case 3 WOMACK v. ELDRIDGE 19
2.3 ¶Ô²Æ²úµÄ¹ÊÒâÇÖȨ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 26
Case 4 PEARSON v. DODD 27
µÚÈýÕ ¹ýʧÇÖȨ¡¡¡¡33
3.1 ¸ÅÂÛ 33
3.2 ½÷É÷µÄÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡ 34
Case 5 ADAMS v. BULLOCK 34
3.3 δÂÄÐÐÔðÈÎ 38
Case 6 TRIMARCO v. KLEIN 39
3.4 Òò¹û¹ØÏµ¡¡¡¡50
Case 7 SUMMERS v. TICE 52
Case 8 BENN v. THOMAS 64
Case 9 OVERSEAS TANKSHIP (U.K.) LTD. v. MORTS DOCK
& ENGINEERING CO., LTD. (THE WAGON MOUND) 3
µÚËÄÕ ÍÁµØËùÓÐÈ˺ÍÕ¼ÓÐÈË¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 82
4.1 ¶ÔÍÁµØÖ®ÍâµÄÈ˵ÄÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 83
4.2 ¶ÔÍÁµØÖ®ÉϵÄÈ˵ÄÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 83
Case 10 MENDOZA v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 84
4.3 ·¿Îݳö×âÈËÓë³Ð×âÈË¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 93
Case 11 PETERSON v. SUPERIOR COURT 93
µÚÎåÕ ÑϸñÇÖȨÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡102
5.1 ¸ÅÄî ¡¡¡¡¡¡102
5.2 ´Óʳ¬³£Î£Ïջ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ 102
Case 12 FLETCHER v. RYLANDS 103
µÚÁùÕ ²úÆ·ÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡113
Case 13 MACPHERSON v. BUICK MOTOR COMPANY 115
µÚÆßÕ ·Áº¦¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡130
Case 14 SHARP v. 251 ST STREET LANDFILL, INC 131
µÚ°ËÕ ·Ì°ù¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡144
Case 15 THE NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN 145
µÚ¾ÅÕ Òþ˽Ȩ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡167
Case 16 RASMUSSEN v. SOUTH FLORIDA BLOOD
SERVICE 169
µÚÊ®ÕÂ Ìæ´úÔðÈΡ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡181
Case 17 CHRISTENSEN v. SWENSON ET AL 183
Case 18 BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL SYSTEM v.
SAMPSON 195