[ ²ÌÎĺ£ ]¡ª¡ª(2005-2-7) / ÒÑÔÄ38061´Î
9¹ù·æ,ǰÒýÎÄ¡£
10 ²Î ¼û "ÖÐ ¹ú °Ù »§ ÉÏ ÊÐ ¹« ˾ ¾ Àí ÈË µ÷ ²é Ö® Ò»£º Êг¡¾ºÕùÓëÊг¡ÖÈÐò", ¡¶Ö¤È¯Ê±±¨¡· (998 Äê 11 Ô 5ÈÕ)¡£
11 M. Casson, Cultural Determinants of Economic Performance (1993) 17 J. Comp. Econ. 418, at 431; Richard Janda, Something Wicked That Way Went: Law and the Habit of Communism, (1995) 41 McGill L.J. 253.
12 See e.g., M. Clarke, Regulating the City (London: Open University Press, 1986; James J. Fishman, A Comparison of Enforcement of Securities Law Violations in the UK and US, The Company Lawyer, Vol. 14, No. 9, at 165; Betty M. Ho£¬"Rethinking the System of Sanctions in the Corporate and Securities Law of Hong Kong¡±, 42 McGill L.J. 603.
13ÖÐ ¹ú ×ÜÀíÖìÈÝ»ù1999Äê 4 Ô ÔÚ ·Ã ÎÊ ÃÀ ¹ú ÆÚ¼äÔø±íʾ£¬ ÖÐ ¹ú Ö¤ ¼à »á ÊÇ Ä¿ ǰ ×î ȱ ·¦È˲ŵIJ¿ÃÅ¡£¼û¡¶ÖÐ ¹ú Ö¤ ¼à ר Òµ ËØ ÖÊ Ðë Ìá Éý¡·£¬¡¶Æ» ¹û ÈÕ ±¨¡· (1999 Äê 8 Ô 10 ÈÕ)¡£
14²Î¼û¡¶²é´¦Ö¤È¯ÆÚ»õÎ¥·¨·¸×ïÖмÓǿе÷ÅäºÏµÄ֪ͨ¡·£¬Ö¤¼à·¢£¨£±£¹£¹£¹£©£±£°ºÅ(£±£¹£¹£¹ÄꣲÔ£±£´ÈÕ)¡£
15See generally A. Downs, Inside Bureacucracy (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967).
16 Àý È磬 ¶Ô ÓÚ Ö¤ ȯ ÆÛ Õ©£¬ ¼´ ʹ Éæ ¼° ·¸ × ÃÀ ¹ú Ö¤ ¼à »á Çã Ïò ÓÚ ×Ô ¼º ¶Ô Ö® Ê© ÒÔ Ãñ Ê ºÍ ÐÐ Õþ ÖÆ ²Ã£¬¶ø ²» ÊÇ ÐÌ ÊÂ ÖÆ ²Ã¡£½á ¹û£¬ÊÊ Óà Ãñ ÊÂ ÖÆ ²Ã µÄ °¸ ¼þ Ô¶ Ô¶ ³¬ ³ö ÐÌ ÊÂ ÖÆ ²Ã µÄ °¸ ¼þ¡£ ÄÚ ÖÐ Ô Òò ¾Í ÊÇ Ö¤ ¼à »á ²» Ïë ´ó Ȩ ÅÔ Âä¡£ See Barry Rider, "Policing the City--Combating Fraud and Other Abuses in Corporate Securities Industry", 41 Current Legal Problems 47 (1988).
17 See D. C. Langevoort, "The SEC as a Bureacucracy: Public Choice, Institutional Rhetoric, and the Process of Policy Foumulation." (1990) 47 Washington and Lee L. Rev. 527, at 531.
18 Wolman, Political Gain Partners in Fighting against Fraud (1987) Financial Times 20 July at p. 32, col 1 (quoting Professor Michael Levi, a researcher of commercial fraud).
19ÃÀ ¹ú Ö¤ ¼à »á ǰ ί Ô± Ùò µÂ ·Ñ ˼ ¹Û ²ì µ½£¬ÓÉ ÓÚ ¸Ã Ö¤ ¼à »á µÄ ÂÉ Ê¦ ÎÞ ·¨ Æð Ëß ´ó ¶à Êý °¸ ¼þ£¬Ëû ÃÇ ¾Í µÃ ÔÚ Ó¦ µ± Æð Ëß Ë£¬ Èç ºÎ Æð Ëß Ëû ÃÇ ÒÔ ¼° Èç ºÎ ¡°Ë½ ÁË¡± ÉÏ »¨ ÐÄ Ë¼£¬ ½á ¹û Õâ µ¼ Ö ÁË Ò» Щ ·Ç ³£ ÓРȤ µÄ Ëß ËÏ Ä£ ʽ¡£ Reliance National "Securities Laws and Corporate Governance: The Advent of a Meltdown?" (May 13, 1999), World Trade Center ) (San Francisco, CA). Please visit the web page
20¡¶Ö¤ ȯ ·¨¡·µÚ 210 Ìõ ¹æ ¶¨£¬¶ÔÖ¤ ¼à»á¾Í֤ȯΥ¹æÐÐΪËù×÷µÄ´¦·£, ¿ÉÒÔÌáÆðÐÐÕþËßËÏ¡£
21 Raymond Tang, "Judicial Review and Due Process in the Enforcement of Seurities Law£º the Hong Kong Experience"£¬An Address to the LAWASIA Conference, Manila, Philippines, 28 August 1997, please visit web page http://www.hksfc.org.hk/eng/index.htm.
22²Î ¼û ¡°Öйú֤ȯµÚһư¸»®ÉϾäºÅ"£¬¾ ¼Ã ÈÕ ±¨¡· (1999 Äê 8 Ô 10 ÈÕ)¡£
23 Õþ ¸® ¼Ó ÖØ ÐÌ ÊÂ ÖÆ ²Ã µÄ ×ö ·¨ µÄ Áí Ò» ¸ö ¿É ÄÜ µÄ ½â ÊÍ ÊÇ£¬ Õâ ÓÐ Öú ÓÚ Ìá Éý Õþ ¸® ÐÎ Ïó£¬ ±í Ã÷ Õþ ¸® Õû ÖÎ ÊÐ ³¡ ÂÒ Ïó µÄ ¾ö ÐÄ£¬½ø ¶ø Ó® µÃ Ãñ ÖÚ µÄ ÕÆ Éù¡£ÓÐ ¹Ø ¾Ù ´ë£¬ÊÇ ·ñ Õæ Õý ÓРЧ£¬ Ëü ÃÇ ²¢ ²» ÔÚ ºõ¡£Õâ ÖÖ ×ö ·¨£¬Ó¢ ¹ú ÔçÓÐ ÏÈ Àý¡£Ò» Щ ÑÐ ¾¿ ÈË Ê¿ Ôø ¶Ô ¸Ã ¹ú ¼à ¹Ü ²¿ ÃÅ µÄ Óà ÐÄ ½ø ÐÐ ÁË ½Ò ¶ ºÍ Åú ÆÀ¡£ See John M Naylor, The Use of Criminal Sanctions by UK and US Authorities for Insider Trading: How Can the Two Systems Learn from Each Other, (1990) 11 Co Law, at 91¡£µ« ÊÇ£¬ÖÐ ¹ú µÄ Çé ¿ö ¿É ÄÜ Óë Ó¢ ¹ú µÄ ²» ͬ¡£ ÒÐ ÖØ ÐÐ Õþ ºÍ ÐÌ ÊÂ ÖÆ ²Ã£¬ ¶ø ºö ÊÓ Ãñ Ê Ôð ÈÎ ÖÆ ¶È µÄ Ô Òò£¬ Ò» ÊÇ ¹Û Äî ÎÊ Ì⣬ ¶þ ÊÇ Ãñ Ê Ôð ÈÎ ¹æ Ôò Ìå ϵ ¼« Æä ¸´ ÔÓ£¬ ÖÐ ¹ú ȱ ·¦ ±Ø Òª µÄ ¾ Ñé ºÍ ·¨ ÂÉ ÈË ²Å¡£ ÔÙ Õߣ¬¾Í ÊÇ Ë½ ¼Ò Ëß ËÏ µÄ ¾ ¼Ã ´ú ¼Û ±» ¸ß ¹À£¬ ¶ø ¹« ˾ Ö¤ ȯ ·¨ ¹æ µÃ ²» µ½ ÓРЧ ʵ Ê© ʱ ½« ²ú Éú µÄ Éç »á ³É ±¾ È´ ±» ÑÏ ÖØ µÍ ¹À¡£
24 ÔÚ ×î ½ü Éó Òé »á¼Æ·¨²Ý°¸Ð޸ĸå ʱ£¬Ò» Щ È« ¹ú ÈË ´ó ³£ ί ί Ô± ¡¢µØ·½ºÍ²¿ÃÅ¾Í Ìá ³ö£¬Ä¿ ǰ ÔÚ Ò» Щ µ¥ λ ÖÐ £¬ ÐÐ Õþ Áì µ¼ µÄ ÊÚ Òâ ¡¢ Ö¸ ʹ ÊÇ »á ¼Æ ×ö ¼Ù ÕÊ µÄ ×î Ö÷ ÒªÔ Òò £¬ Äß ËÄ Òå / Ô¬ êÊ , ¡°ÖÐ ¹ú Äâ ÑÏ ´¦ »á ¼Æ Òµ Î¥¹æ Ôì ¼Ù ÐРΪ¡±(1999 Äê8 ÔÂ24 ÈÕ Ð»ªÉç¸å) ¡£
25 Ò» ¸ö Ïà ·´ µÄ Àý ×Ó ÊÇ ÔÚ ±± ÃÀ£¬È¡ µÃ Ò½ Éú ºÍ ÂÉ Ê¦ µÄ Ö´ ÕÕ Ðè Òª ¶à Äê ¿à ¶Á£¬ »ú »á ³É ±¾ ¸ß °º¡£¶à Êý Ö´ Òµ ÈË Ê¿ Çá Ò× ²» ¸Ò Î¥ ·¨£¬Òò Ϊ µõ Ïú Ö´ ÕÕ µÄ Ëð ʧ Ì« ´ó ÁË¡£
26See Bruce Benson, The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State, Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, San Francisco, 1990, at 137-140.
27 ²Î ¼û¡° ÖÐ ¹ú ±£ »¤ Ïû ·Ñ Õß ÏÖ ×´ µ÷ ²é¡±£¬ ¡¶¾ ¼Ã ÈÕ ±¨¡·(1999 Äê 7 Ô 27 ÈÕ)¡£
28 ºÜ ´ó ³Ì ¶È ÉÏ£¬Õâ ¹é Òò ÓÚ °² ´ó ÂÔ Ê¡ Õþ ¸® ί ÍÐ, ¾Í Ö¤ ȯ ¹Ü ÖÆ ÎÊ Ìâ ½ø ÐÐ ÑÐ ¾¿ µÄ ÑÐ ¾¿ С ×é ÓÚ 1965 Äê Ìá ³ö µÄ "½ð ±´ ±¨ ¸æ¡±(Kimber Report)¡£ See John S. M. Turner, "Prospectus Misrepresentation Defences", (1989) 10 Co Law, at 108.
29 See, e.g., The Toronto Stock Exchange Committee on Corporate Disclosure, "Responsible Corporate Discloure: A Search for Balance" (released in May 1997).
30 ¡°ÃÀ ¹ú µÄ ¼¯ Ìå Ëß ËÏ ÓÎ Ï· ÒÑ ¾ ¿ª »¨ ½á ¹û£¬ ³É Ϊ Ò» ¸ö ³É Êì µÄ ²ú Òµ¡£ ÔÚ ¼Ó Äà ´ó£¬ Õâ ¸ö ÓÎ Ï· ¿´ À´ »á ±» Èç ·¨ ÅÚ ÖÆ¡£" Eric Reguly, "Speaking of Livent: Class-action fever threatens Canadian firms", Globe and Mail (August 14, 1998). µ« ÊÇ, ¼Ó ¹ú ¼Ì Ðø ÊÊ Óà ¡°°Ü Ëß ·½ ³Ð µ£ ʤ Ëß ·½ ËÏ ·Ñ¡±µÄ Ò» °ã Ô Ôò¡£ Õâ Ò» ¶¨ ³Ì ¶È ÉÏ ¿É ÄÜ »á ¶ô ÖÆ Ö¤ ȯ Ëß ËÏ µÄ ·º ÀÄ¡£ Id.
31 Fishman, op. cit., at 166. ÔÚÖÐ ¹ú£¬ Óйط½ÃæÒ²±íʾ£¬²é´¦Ö¤È¯·¸×ïÖ÷ÒªÒÀ¿¿¾Ù±¨¡£²Î ¼û "ÐÂÐÌ·¨ÉúЧ»á¼õÉÙ¹ÉÊз¶¹æÂð?"£¬ ¡¶¾¼ÃÈÕ±¨¡· (1997Äê11ÔÂ4ÈÕ)
32 See John M Naylor, The Use of Criminal Sanctions by UK and US Authorities for Insider Trading: How Can the Two Systems Learn from Each Other, (1990) 11 Co Law, at 58.
33 ²Î ¼û ²Ì ÎÄ º££º¡°´Ó ÖÐ ¹ú Ê× ×Ú ¹É Ãñ ×´ ¸æ ÉÏ ÊÐ ¹« ˾ ÆÛ Õ© °¸ ˵ Æð-ÖÐ ¹ú ˽ ÈË Ö¤ ȯ Ëß ËÏ µÄ À§ ¾³£¬ ³ö · ºÍ Òâ Ò塱£¬¡¶ÐÅ ±¨ ²Æ ¾Ô¿¯¡·£¬1999 Äê9Ôºţ¬µÚ107-112Ò³¡£
34 Ëù ν ¡°ÐÅ Àµ ¼Ù ¶¨¡±£¬¾Í ÊÇ ¼Ù ¶¨ Ô ¸æ Ͷ ×Ê Õß ÔÚ Âò Âô Ö¤ ȯ ʱ£¬ ÒѾÐÅÀµÓÚÕйÉÊé »òÕ߯äËûÊéÃæ»òÕß¿ÚͷͨÐÅÖеĴíÎó³Â Êö¡£ÕâÖÖ¼Ù¶¨ÊÇ ¿ÉÒÔ±»·´²µµÄ¡£
35 ÔÚ ½ª ij Ëß ºì ¹â ʵ Òµ ¹« ˾ °¸ ÖУ¬ÉÏ º£ ÆÖ ¶« ÐÂ Çø ·¨ Ôº ¼´ ÒÔ Ô ¸æ ÎÞ ·¨ Ö¤ Ã÷ Æä Ëð ʧ Óë ±» ¸æ Ðé ¼Ù ³Â Êö µÄ Òò ¹û ¹Ø ϵ Ϊ ÓÉ ²Ã ¶¨ ²µ »Ø Ô ¸æ µÄ Æð Ëß¡£ ²Î¼û "¹ú ÄÚ Ê× Àý С ¹É ¶« ×´ ¸æ ÉÏ ÊÐ ¹« ˾ ÆÛ Õ© °¸ ÓÐ ½á ¹û¡±,¡¶Öйú ¾¼Ã ʱ±¨¡· (1999 Äê 5 Ô 4 ÈÕ)¡£
36 ²Î ¼û ²Ì ÎÄ º££¬ ǰ Òý ÎÄ£¬ µÚ 109-110 Ò³¡£
37 ²Î ¼û Ìï±ù´¨£¬¡¶Ïò֤ȯÊг¡ Êä Ëͺϸñ¡°ÉÌ Æ·¡±-ÖÐ ¹ú Ö¤¼à»á·¨ Âɲ¿¸ºÔðÈË´ð ±¾ ¿¯¼ÇÕßÎÊ¡·£¬¡¶ÖÐ ¹ú ÂÉ Ê¦¡·1999 Äê µÚ 4 ÆÚ£¬ µÚ 25Ò³¡£
38 See John M Naylor, The Use of Criminal Sanctions by UK and US Authorities for Insider Trading: How Can the Two Systems Learn from Each Other, (1990) 11 Co Law; Betty M. Ho£¬"Rethinking the System of Sanctions in the Corporate and Securities Law of Hong Kong¡±, 42 McGill L.J. 603. Ãñ Ê Ôð ÈÎ ÖÆ ¶È µÄ ÖØ Òª ÐÔ ½ü À´ ËÆ ºõ µÃ µ½ ÁË ÖØ ÊÓ¡£ ²Î ¼û ¡¶Áº ¶¨ °î£º ¹É ÊÐ Ó¦ ËÄ ¹Ü Æë Ï¡·,¡¶ÖÐ ¹ú ¾ ¼Ã ʱ ±¨¡·(1999 Äê 9 Ô 22 ÈÕ)¡£ Áº ¶¨ °î ÏÈ Éú ÏÖ ÔÚ ÊÇ ÖÐ ¹ú Ö¤ ¼à »á Ê× Ï¯ ¹Ë ÎÊ¡£
39 See, e.g., Securities and Investment Board v. Loyd-Wright, [1994] 1 B. C. L. C. 147.
40 ²Î ¼û ¸Ã ·¨ µÚ 135 Ìõ£¬ÔØ ÓÚ ²Ì ÎÄ º£ Òë У£º¡¶¼Ó Äà ´ó ÖØ Òª ÉÌ Òµ ¹« ˾ ·¨ ºÍ Ö¤ ȯ ·¨¡·£¬ÖÐ ¹ú ¶Ô Íâ ¾ ¼Ã ó Ò× ³ö °æ É磬1999 ÄêµÚ1 °æ¡£
41 See Trish Saywell, "Demanding Action", Far Economic Economic Review (May 13, 1999).
×ܹ²2Ò³¡¡¡¡[1] 2
ÉÏÒ»Ò³¡¡¡¡