[ Ç®¸£³¼ ]¡ª¡ª(2013-7-29) / ÒÑÔÄ13306´Î
[3]Edited by Kermit L. Hall. By and For the People, Constitutional Rights in American History[J]. Harlan Davidson, inc. ,1991.
[4]David S. Elkind. State Action, Theories for Applying Constitutional Restrictions to Private Activity[J]. Columbia Law Review, 1974, May.
[5]Jan Smits. Private Law and Fundamental Rights: A Sceptical View[A]. Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert Lindenbergh(ed), Constitutionalisation of private Law[C]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
[6]Greg Taylor. Why the Common Law should be only Indirectly Affected by Constitutional Guarantees: A Comment on Stone[J]. Melbourne University Law Review, December, 2002.
[7]Ralf Brinktrine. The Horizontal Effect of Human Rights in German Constitutional Law: Debate on Horizontality and the Possible Role Model of the Germen "Mittelbare Drittwirkung Der Grundrechte"[J]. European Human Rights Review,2001.
[8]Megan M. Cooper. Dusting off tne Old Play Book: How the Supreme Court Disregarded the Bloom Trilogy£¬Returned to theories of the Past, and Found State Action througL Entwinement in Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n[J]. Creighton Law Review, 2002,(4).
[9]Ralph D. Mawdsley. The Supreme Court and Athletic Associations: A New State Action Theory[N]. West's Education Law Reporter, 2001-09-27.
[10]µÏÌØ¶û¡¤Ã·µÏ¿â˹.µÂ¹úÃñ·¨×ÜÂÛ£¬ÉÛ½¨¶«Òë[M].±±¾©£º·¨Âɳö°æÉ磬2001.
¡¡¡¡¡¾ÔÎijö´¦¡¿¡¶ÇóÊÇѧ¿¯¡·2013ÄêµÚ1ÆÚ
¡¡¡¡£¨×÷Õßµ¥Î»£ººÚÁú½´óѧ·¨Ñ§ÀíÂÛÓë·¨ÖÆ·¢Õ¹Ñо¿ÖÐÐÄ£©
×ܹ²3Ò³¡¡¡¡[1] [2] 3
ÉÏÒ»Ò³¡¡¡¡