<blockquote id="weqoq"></blockquote>
<tr id="weqoq"><code id="weqoq"></code></tr>
  • <tr id="weqoq"><code id="weqoq"></code></tr>
  • <legend id="weqoq"></legend>
  • <center id="weqoq"><sup id="weqoq"></sup></center>
  • <legend id="weqoq"><input id="weqoq"></input></legend>
  • ·¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý

  • з¨¹æËÙµÝ

  • ÂÛµ£±£ÎïȨÔÚÆÆ²ú³ÌÐòÖеÄʵÏÖ£¨ÉÏ£©

    [ ÐíµÂ·ç ]¡ª¡ª(2012-1-12) / ÒÑÔÄ41613´Î

    [93] Koopmans v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, ACA, 102 F.3d 874 (7thCir. 1996); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1129.06 [1][c] (Rev. 15th ed. 2000).
    [94] ¡°¡­abandonment of the collateral to the creditor would clearly satisfy indubitable equivalence, as would a lien on similar collateral... Unsecured notes as to the secured claim or equity securities of the debtor would not be the indubitable equivalent...¡± 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6544; Gerard McCormack, Corporate Rescue Law: An Anglo-American Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2008, p. 265.
    [95] Warren et al., supra note 58, pp. 711 ff.
    [96] 11 USC ¡ì 1129(b)(2).
    [97] Klee, All You Ever wanted to Know about Cram Down Under the New Bankruptcy Code, 53 Am. Bankr. L. J. 133 (1979).
    [98] LoPucki, Bargaining Over Equity's Share in the Bankruptcy Reorganization of Large, Publicly Held Companies, 139 U. Pa. L. Rev. 125, 149-150 (1990).
    [99] Baird, supra note 27, p. 281.
    [100] In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc., 115 B.R. 34 (Bankr. S.D.N.Z. 1990)¡£Ò²ÓÐһЩ·¨Ôº¶Ô½»²æµ£±£³Ö»³ÒÉ̬¶È¡£In re Saybrook Mfg. Co., 963 F.2d 1490 (1992, CA11 Ga).
    [101] Dahiya, Debtor-in-Possession Financing and Bankruptcy Resolution: Empirical Evidence, 69 J. Fin. Econ. 259, 265 (2003).
    [102] Bris et al., The Costs of Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Liquidation versus Chapter 11 Reorganization, 61 The Journal of Finance 1253, 1290 (2006).
    [103] Frank, An Empiricial Investigation of U.S. Firms in Reorganization, 44 Journal of Finance. 747 (1989).
    [104] Ayotte et al., Review: An Efficiency-Based Explanation for Current Corporate Reorganization Practice (Lynn M. LoPucki, Courting Failure, University of Michigan Press, 2005), 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 425 (2006).
    [105] M¨¹Ko-Eidenm¨¹ller, ¡ì 222 InsO Rn. 44; Uhlenbruck-L¨¹er, ¡ì 222 InsO Rn. 20; BGH MDR 2006, 116 (118) (BGH vom 7.7.2005 ¨C IX ZB 266/04).
    [106] M¨¹Ko-Eidenm¨¹ller, ¡ì 222 InsO Rn. 29; HK-Flessner, ¡ì 222 InsO Rn. 11; Hess/Weis, Die sachgerechte Abgrenzung der Gläubigergruppen nach der InsO, InVo 1998, 64 (67).
    [107] Marotzke, Die dinglichen Sicherheiten im neuen Insolvenzrecht, ZZP 1996, 429 (437).
    [108] ǰÒý×¢39, Bork, Rn.336.
    [109] Schiessler, Der Insolvenzplan, Bielefeld, 1997, S. 149.
    [110] Ôڵ¹úÆÆ²úʵ¼ùÖУ¬·¨ÔºÍ¨³£²»»á¶Ô±»¸øÒÔÀûÏ¢²¹³¥µÄµ£±£Õ®È¨È˵ÄͶƱȨÌá³öÖÊÒÉ¡£LG Göttingen NZI 2005, 41 (42 f.); OLG Köln (Beschluss vom 5. 1. 2001 ¨C 2 W 228 / 00) NZI 2001, 660 ff.
    [111] ǰÒý×¢7£¬°²½¨Ê飬µÚ150Ò³¡£
    [112] ¼û¡¶×î¸ßÈËÃñ·¨Ôº¹ØÓÚÉóÀíÆó񵮮²ú°¸¼þÈ·¶¨¹ÜÀíÈ˱¨³êµÄ¹æ¶¨¡·£¬µÚ13Ìõ¡£

    ×ܹ²5Ò³¡¡¡¡[1] [2] [3] [4] 5

    ÉÏÒ»Ò³¡¡¡¡

    ==========================================

    ÃâÔðÉùÃ÷£º
    ÉùÃ÷£º±¾ÂÛÎÄÓÉ¡¶·¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý¡·ÍøÕ¾Êղأ¬
    ½ö¹©Ñ§ÊõÑо¿²Î¿¼Ê¹Óã¬
    °æÈ¨ÎªÔ­×÷ÕßËùÓУ¬Î´¾­×÷ÕßͬÒ⣬²»µÃ×ªÔØ¡£

    ==========================================

    ÂÛÎÄ·ÖÀà

    A ·¨Ñ§ÀíÂÛ

    C ¹ú¼Ò·¨¡¢ÏÜ·¨

    E ÐÐÕþ·¨

    F ÐÌ·¨

    H Ãñ·¨

    I ÉÌ·¨

    J ¾­¼Ã·¨

    N ËßËÏ·¨

    S ˾·¨ÖƶÈ

    T ¹ú¼Ê·¨


    Copyright © 1999-2021 ·¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý

    .

    .

    Å·ÃÀ¾«Æ·Ò»Çø¶þÇøÃÛÍÎÑÇÖÞ <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´>