<blockquote id="weqoq"></blockquote>
<tr id="weqoq"><code id="weqoq"></code></tr>
  • <tr id="weqoq"><code id="weqoq"></code></tr>
  • <legend id="weqoq"></legend>
  • <center id="weqoq"><sup id="weqoq"></sup></center>
  • <legend id="weqoq"><input id="weqoq"></input></legend>


  • µ±Ç°Î»Ö㺷¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý>>·¨Öζ¯Ì¬>>ÆÚ¿¯Ä¿Â¼>>¡¶·¨Ñ§ÔÓÖ¾¡·2012ÄêµÚÎåÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª



    ¡¶·¨Ñ§ÔÓÖ¾¡·2012ÄêµÚÎåÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª

    http://www.cnhottime.cn¡¡ 2012-7-24 14:52:35¡¡ À´Ô´£ºÖйú·¨Ñ§»áÍø


    1 ¡¢ÎäÊ÷³¼½ÌÊÚ  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ <Õý>ÎäÊ÷³¼,ÄÐ,1949Äê10ÔÂ29ÈÕ³öÉú,±±¾©ÊÐÈË,ºº×å,Öй²µ³Ô±,±±¾©Êз¨Ñ§»á¸±»á³¤¡£1978Äê2ÔÂÖÁ1982Äê2ÔÂÔÚ±±¾©´óѧ·¨ÂÉѧϵ¶Á±¾¿Æ(ÆßÆß¼¶)²¢»ñ·¨Ñ§Ñ§Ê¿Ñ§Î»¡£±ÏÒµºóÁôУÈνÌ,½²ÊÚÖйú·¨ÂÉ˼ÏëÊ·¡¢Öйú´«Í³·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯¡¢Öйú·¨Ê·ÎÄÏ×ѧ£»
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Öйú·¨ÂÉ˼ÏëÊ·£» Öйú´«Í³·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯£» ±±¾©ÊУ» ·¨Ñ§»á£» Öйú·¨Ñ§£» ·¨ÂÉѧ£» ÎÄÏ×ѧ£» ±±¾©´óѧ£» ѧʿѧλ£» Öй²µ³Ô±£»
     
    2 ¡¢ÖйúÌØÉ«ÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖÆ¶ÈµÄÖØ´ó·¢Õ¹  ±å½¨ÁÖ£¨ÖйúÕþ·¨´óѧËßËÏ·¨Ñ§Ñо¿Ëù£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨ÐÞ¸ÄÔÚ¼á³Ö´ÓÎÒ¹ú»ù±¾¹úÇé³ö·¢,Ñ­Ðò½¥½øµØÍƽøÎÒ¹úÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖÆ¶ÈµÄÍêÉÆ;¼á³Öͳ³ï´¦ÀíºÃ³Í·£·¸×ïÓë±£ÕÏÈËȨµÄ¹ØÏµ;¼á³Ö×ÅÁ¦½â¾öÔÚ³ÍÖη¸×ïÓëά»¤Ë¾·¨¹«Õý·½Ãæ´æÔÚµÄÍ»³öÎÊÌâÔ­ÔòÏÂ,¹á³¹ÁË"×ðÖØºÍ±£ÕÏÈËȨ"µÄÏÜ·¨Ô­Ôò,¶ÔÖ¤¾ÝÖÆ¶È¡¢±ç»¤ÖƶÈ¡¢Ç¿ÖÆ´ëÊ©¡¢Õì²é³ÌÐò¡¢ÉóÅгÌÐò¡¢Ö´ÐгÌÐòµÈ·½Ãæ×÷ÁËÍêÉÆ,ÊÇÖйúÌØÉ«ÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖÆ¶ÈµÄÖØ´ó·¢Õ¹¡£µ«ÔÚÈ¡µÃºÜ´ó³É¼¨µÄͬʱ,ÎÊÌâÓë²»×ãÒ²Êǿ͹۴æÔÚµÄ,»¹ÐèÒª½øÒ»²½ÍêÉÆ,²¢Í¨¹ý˾·¨½âÊ͵ijǫ̈ºÍʵʩϸÔòµÄÖÆ¶¨¼ÓÒÔÃÖ²¹¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Revision of China¡¯s criminal procedure law adheres to the principles, such as promoting improvement of China¡¯s criminal procedural system from the basic national condition, coordinating the relationship of punishment and human rights protection, and making efforts to resolve the outstanding problems of fighting against crimes and maintaining the judicial justice. It¡¯s reaffirmed the constitutional principle of "respecting and protecting human rights", revised and improved evidence system, defense system, coercive measures, investigation procedures, trial procedures, and execution procedures. The revision was the major development of the criminal procedural system with Chinese characteristics. However, there were still certain problems and shortages to be improved and completed in judicial interpretations and implementation rules.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨Ð޸ģ» Ô­Ôò£» Òªµã£» ÎÊÌâÓë²»×㣻
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ revision of the criminal procedural law principles main points problems and shortages£»
     
    3 ¡¢ÔÙÉó³ÌÐòµÄÀí½âÓëÊÊÓ᪡ª¼æÆÀ¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·¹ØÓÚÔÙÉó³ÌÐòµÄÐ޸Ġ ³ÂÎÀ¶«;¶ÅÀÚ£¨ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÐÌÊÂÔÙÉó³ÌÐò,ÊÇÒ»Öַdz£¾È¼Ã³ÌÐò,Ó¦µ±×¢ÖØÔÙÉó¾À´íÓë³ÌÐò°²¶¨ÐÔ¼ÛÖµÖ®¼äµÄºâƽ¡£´Ë´Î¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·ÐÞ¸ÄÓÃÐÞ¸ÄÁ½Ìõ¡¢ÐÂÔöÁ½ÌõµÄ·½Ê½¶ÔÐÌÊÂÔÙÉó³ÌÐò×÷ÁËÒ»¶¨µÄÐÞ¸ÄÓëÍêÉÆ,ÓÐÆä½ø²½ÒâÒå¡£µ«¶ÔÓÚÉêË߸ÄÔì¡¢ÔÙÉóÊÂÓɵÄÉèÖá¢ÔÙÉóµÄÆô¶¯Ö÷ÌåÒÔ¼°ÔÙÉóÉóÀí³ÌÐòµÄ¹¹½¨µÈºËÐÄÎÊÌⲢûÓÐÉæ¼°¡£Òò¶ø,´Ë´Î¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·¹ØÓÚÔÙÉó³ÌÐòµÄÐÞ¸ÄÖ»ÄܳƵÃÉÏÊdzÌÐò"΢µ÷"¡£´Ó˾·¨ÊÊÓõĽǶÈÀ´½²,С¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·µÄÓйع涨ÉÐÓнøÒ»²½ÍêÉÆ¡¢Ï¸»¯µÄ±ØÒª¡£¶Ô´Ë,½áºÏÖйúµÄ˾·¨Êµ¼Ê,¿ÉÒÔͨ¹ý˾·¨½âÊ͵ÄÐÎʽ¼ÓÒÔÍêÉÆ,ÒÔͳһָµ¼Ë¾·¨Êµ¼ù¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Criminal retrial procedure, as an important relief procedure, should consider the balance between error correction and stability of procedure. Two articles are amended in the criminal procedure law (2012)while another two articles are added in it. Although the amendment possesses progress, they do not mention the core problems such as starting of the criminal retrial procedure and construction of the hearing procedure. So we can only say this is just an adjustment of the criminal retrial procedure. From view of judicial application, there is still room to improve. Maybe we could think about the way of judicial interpretation to solve this problem with background of current judicial practice in China.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ 96Äê¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·£» ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨ÐÞÕý°¸£» ÔÙÉó³ÌÐò£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ criminal procedure law (1996) criminal procedure law(2012) the criminal retrial procedure£»
     
    4 ¡¢¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·ÐÞ¸Ä͹ÏÔÈËȨ±£ÕÏ¡ª¡ªÂÛ²»µÃÇ¿ÆÈ×ÔÖ¤ÓÐ×ïºÍ·Ç·¨Ö¤¾ÝÅųýÌõ¿î  ÑîÓî¹Ú£¨ÖйúÕþ·¨´óѧËßËÏ·¨Ñ§Ñо¿Ëù£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ´Ë´ÎÎÒ¹ú¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·ÐÞ¸Ä,¹æ¶¨Á˲»µÃÇ¿ÆÈÈκÎÈË֤ʵ×Ô¼ºÓÐ×ï,»¹Ôö¼ÓÁË·Ç·¨Ö¤¾ÝÅųýµÄ¹æ¶¨¡£ÕâЩÐÂÔöÄÚÈÝÖ®¼ä´æÔÚ½ôÃÜÁªÏµ,ÿһÏîÓÖÓи÷×ÔµÄÒâÒå¡£"²»Ç¿ÆÈ×ÔÖ¤Æä×ï"Ìõ¿îÊÇ"×ðÖØºÍ±£ÕÏÈËȨ"µÄ½øÒ»²½ÌåÏÖ,¹ØÏµµ½ÎÒ¹úÐÌÊÂÕì²é¡¢¼ì²ìºÍ˾·¨²¿ÃŵÄÖ°ÔðºÍ¸öÈËȨÀûµÄ±£ÕÏ;·Ç·¨Ö¤¾ÝÅųýÊÇÂäʵ²»Ç¿ÆÈ×ÔÖ¤Æä×ïµÄ¾ßÌå´ëÊ©,ͨ¹ýÔ¼ÊøÕì²é²¿ÃÅȡ֤ÐÐΪ¶ÔÇÖ·¸¸öÈËȨÀûÌṩÁ˲¹¾È´ëÊ©¡£ÕâЩ¶¼ÊÇÎÒ¹ú¡¶ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·ÔÚÔ­ÔòÐÔºÍÖÆ¶È·½ÃæµÄÖØ´óÐ޸ġ£ÎÄÕÂÏêϸÑо¿ÁËÐÂÔö¼ÓµÄÕâЩÌõ¿îµÄÈ·Çк¬Òå,Ö¸³öÆäÖеĽø²½ÒâÒå,·ÖÎöÁË´æÔÚµÄÎÊÌâ,Ìá³öÖ´ÐÐÐÂÔö¼ÓµÄÕâЩ·¨ÂÉÌõÎıØÐë×¢ÒâµÄÊÂÏî¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Amendments of China¡¯s criminal procedure law clearly stipulate that no one shall be compelled to incriminate themselves, which directly reflects respect and safeguarding of human rights in the criminal justice system. It also goes beyond the criminal justice system by safeguarding the rights of society as a whole. The amendment also added the exclusionary rule. Five new articles are related to the rule, including the exclusion of oral evidence, the procuratorate¡¯s function in suppressing the illegal evidence, court hearing process of suppressing the evidence, burden of proof and level of proof. These contents have formed a complete system of exclusionary rule. These articles have been made on the basis of extensive theoretical researches and experiences of practice at home and abroad and in line with the United Nations¡¯ guidelines on international criminal justice.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ·¨Ð޸ģ» ±£ÕÏÈËȨ£» ²»Ç¿ÆÈ×ÔÖ¤Æä× ·Ç·¨Ö¤¾ÝÅųý£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ criminal procedure law amendment privilege against self-incrimination exclusionary rule£»
     
    5 ¡¢Í»Î§Â¢¶Ï:Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ±£»¤Ö®Ïò¶È°ÑÎÕ¡ª¡ªÒÔÖÐÎ÷·½ÎÄ»¯´«Í³²îÒìΪÊӽǠ ºú³äº®£¨¹ã¶«ÍâÓïÍâó´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;º«Ñ§ÖÜ£¨±±¾©¿Æ¼¼´óѧ£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ֪ʶ²úȨÊ×ÏÈÓ¦¸ÃÊÇÒ»¸öÎÄ»¯ÎÊÌâ,ÆäÔÚÖйú´«Í³ÎÄ»¯ÖоßÓй²ÏíÐÔ¡¢ÊµÓÃÐÔÓëµÍ¼ÛÐÔ,µ±Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ·¨ÂÉÔÚÏçÍÁÉç»áµÄ¹ú¼Ê»¯½ø³ÌÖÐÔâÓö֪ʶ¢¶Ï¡¢¹æÂÉÀíÐÔÓëȨÀûÖÁÉϵÄÎÄ»¯Ìôսʱ,Öйú֪ʶ²úȨÎÄ»¯½¨Éè±ØÐëͨ¹ý³ä·Ö½â·Å˼ÏëÓë´óµ¨´´Ðµķ½Ê½ºÍгáÈÆð,ͻΧ¢¶Ï,¹¹½¨ÓÐÖйúÌØÉ«µÄ֪ʶ²úȨ±£»¤Ìåϵ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Intellectual property shall firstly be a cultural issue. It has the sharing, practical and low-costing characteristics in Chinese traditional culture. When Chinese intellectual property law encounters challenges of cultural monopoly, the ration of law and the right supremacy in internationalization of the local community, China¡¯s intellectual property right cultural construction shall rise up harmoniously through mind-emancipations and bold innovation. The monopoly shall be broken through and an intellectual property protection system with Chinese characteristics shall be built.
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ֪ʶ²úȨÎÄ»¯£» ÎÄ»¯ÌôÕ½£» ÎÄ»¯½¨É裻 ±£»¤Ìåϵ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ intellectual property culture cultural challenges cultural construction protection system£»
     
    6 ¡¢ÅÐÀý·¨´«Í³ÓëÖлª·¨Ïµ  ºúÐ˶«£¨Çú¾¸Ê¦·¶Ñ§Ôº£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Öлª·¨ÏµÊÇÖйú¹Å´ú·¨ÂÉÌåϵµÄÒ»ÖÖ×ÜÀ¨ÐÔ³ÆÎ½¡£Ôڴ˸ÅÄîϰüÀ¨×ÅÖйúÀúÊ·ÉÏÐγɵķ¨ÂÉ´«Í³µÄ·½·½ÃæÃæ¡£×÷ΪһÖÖ×Ô³ÉÌåϵµÄ·¨ÂÉÌåϵ,Öйú¹Å´úÅÐÀý·¨Öƶȹ¹³ÉÁËÆäÖеÄÒ»¸öÄÚÈÝ,Ò²ÊÇÖлª·¨ÏµµÄÒ»¸öÌØÖÊ¡£´«Í³ÖйúÅÐÀý·¨ÔÚģʽÉϳöÏÖ³ÉÎÄ·¨µäÓë·Ç³ÉÎÄ·¨µäÏÂÁ½ÖÖ,ÆäÖÐÖ÷ÒªÊdzÉÎÄ·¨µäϵÄÅÐÀý·¨¡£´«Í³ÅÐÀý·¨ÔÚÀàÐÍÉÏÓд´ÖÆÐÍ¡¢²¹³äÐͺͽâÊÍÐÍ,ÔÚ×÷ÓÃÉÏÓÐ×÷ΪÅоöÒÀ¾Ý¡¢·¨ÂÉÊÊÓÃÂÛÖ¤ÒÀ¾ÝºÍÁ¢·¨ÒÀ¾Ý,ÂÛÖ¤ÀàÐÍÉÏÓбÈÀàÍÆÀíºÍ¸ß¶ÈÂ×ÀíÐÔ˵Àí,ÔÚÕûÌåÉÏÌåÏÖ³öÓнÏΪÍêÉÆµÄÂß¼­½á¹¹¡¢·ÖÀà¾ßÌåÊÊÓõÈ¡£×ÜÖ®,Öйú´«Í³ÅÐÀý·¨ÔÚÀàÐÍÉÏ¡¢×÷ÓÃÉÏ¡¢ÊÊÓÃÉ϶¼ÌåÏÖ³ö²»Í¬ÓÚ½ü´úÆÕͨ·¨ÏµÏµÄÅÐÀý·¨Ìصã¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ China¡¯s legal system is the title of ancient China¡¯s legal systems. This concept includes all aspects of the legal tradition in Chinese history. As a self-contained legal system, the case law system constitutes one part, also one of the characteristics of Chinese legal system. Formation of Chinese traditional case law is closely related to the context of the entire traditional Chinese legal culture. China¡¯s traditional case law has are two modes, namely the code of law and non-written code, while case law under the code of law reflects its main characteristics. The traditional case law has three types, i.e., creating, supplementing and interpretation. It is also used as the basis of cases¡¯ sentences, application of law and legislation, which is typed as the analogically reasoning and highly ethical reasoning that has complete logic structure and concrete application, etc. In general, it is absolutely different from the modern common law in many ways.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Öлª·¨Ïµ£» ÆÕͨ·¨Ïµ£» ÅÐÀý·¨£» ±ÈÀࣻ
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ Chinese legal system common law system case law analogy£»
     
    7 ¡¢´«Í³Öйú·¨±È¸½Ô®ÒýµÄÔ´ÓëÁ÷  »Æ´ºÑࣨɽ¶«Õþ·¨Ñ§Ôº·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Îı¾±í´ïÓë˾·¨Êµ¼ù±³ÀëµÄÎÊÌâ×Ô¹ÅÓÐÖ®,Ö±µ½½ñÌìÈÔÈ»À§ÈÅ×ÅÎÒÃÇ¡£´«Í³·¨±È¸½Ô®ÒýÔÚÃֺϷ¨ÂÉÎı¾Óë˾·¨Êµ¼ùµÄ·ì϶·½Ãæ·¢»ÓÁËÖÁ¹ØÖØÒªµÄ×÷ÓÃ,ÓëÔµ·¨¶¨×ïÖ®¼ä´æÔÚÒ»¶¨µÄÕÅÁ¦,¶þÕß¹²Í¬±£Ö¤ÁË˾·¨½áÂ۵ĺϷ¨ÐÔÓëÕýµ±ÐÔ¡£ÈçºÎÔ¼ÊøË¾·¨Õ߱ȸ½µÄí§ÒâÐÔ,ÊDZȸ½Ô®ÒýÄܹ»·¢»ÓÓ¦ÓÐ×÷ÓõÄǰÌá±£Ö¤¡£Ì½¾¿±È¸½Ô®ÒýµÄÔ´ÓëÁ÷¶Ôµ±ÏÂ×ïÐÌ·¨¶¨ÏÂÈçºÎ°ÑÎÕÀ©ÕÅÐÔ½âÊ͵ĶȾßÓÐÒ»¶¨µÄÆô·¢ÒâÒå¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The problem of the lap between text expression and judicial practice existed in ancient society, but still confuses us today. Analogy in traditional law played an important role in closing the lap between text expression and judicial practice. There was a tension between analogy and conviction according to the law, which both guaranteed legality and legitimacy of judicial conclusion. How to constrain the judiciary arbitrarily judging was the premise which made analogy play an important role. Exploring the origin of analogy has some inspiration to how to grasp the limitation of the interpretation of expansion under the principle of legality today.
     
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ±È¸½Ô®Òý£» Ôµ·¨¶¨× À©ÕŽâÊÍ£» ×ïÐÌ·¨¶¨£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ analogy conviction according to the law the interpretation of expansion the principle of legality£»
     
    8 ¡¢Éç»á·¢Õ¹ÖеÄÖйú·¨Àíѧã£ÂÛ  ·¶½øÑ§£¨ÉϺ£½»Í¨´óѧ¿­Ô­·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¸Ä¸ï¿ª·ÅÒÔÀ´µÄ·¨ÀíѧÔÚÑо¿Óë½ÌѧÉÏÔÚÒ»¶¨³Ì¶ÈÉÏÓëÖйúģʽ֮¼ä´æÔÚ×ÅÒ»ÖÖÕÅÁ¦,Æä±íÕ÷ÊÇ:·¨Àíѧ֮Î÷·½ÖªÊ¶ÓëÖйúģʽ֮¶«·½¾­ÑéµÄã£ÂÛ¡¢·¨Àíѧ֮"ȨÀû±¾Î»"ÓëÖйúģʽ֮"·¢Õ¹""Îȶ¨"Ä¿±êµÄã£ÂÛ¡¢·¨Àíѧ֮·¨ÂÉ×ÔÓɼÛÖµÓÅÏÈÓëÖйúģʽ֮·¨ÂÉÖÈÐò¼ÛÖµÓÅÏȵÄã£ÂÛ¡¢·¨Àíѧ֮ÒÔ"¸öÈË"Ϊ±¾µÄ·¨ÂɹÛÓëÖйúģʽ֮ÒÔ"ÈËÃñ"Ϊ±¾µÄ·¨Âɹ۵Äã£ÂÛ¡£ÈçºÎÈÏʶÓë¿´´ýÕâЩã£ÂÛ,Êǵ±Ï·¨Àíѧ·¢Õ¹µÄпÎÌâ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ To some extent , there exists a kind of tension between jurisprudence and the Chinese model in research & teaching since reforming and opening, whose superficial characteristics is: paradox between the western jurisprudential knowledge and the oriental experience of China¡¯s model, paradox between jurisprudential "standard of right" and the target of "development" & "stability" of China¡¯s model, paradox between the priority of the legal independent value and the priority of the legal orderly value of China¡¯s model, paradox between legal concept based on "individual" and the legal concept based on "the people" of China¡¯s model. How to recognize and treat these paradoxes is the new subject of the development of jurisprudence at present.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Öйúģʽ£» ·¨Àíѧ£» ã£ÂÛ£» ±äÔ죻
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ China¡¯s model jurisprudence paradox alter£»
     
    9 ¡¢Å©´åÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨Á÷ת·¨ÂÉÎÊÌâÐÂ̽¡ª¡ªÒÔ±±¾©µØÇø²¿·Ö»ù²ãÈËÃñ·¨ÔºËùÉóÀíÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨Á÷ת¾À·×°¸¼þΪÀý  ÁúÒí·É;ÕÔá°Òô£¨ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ½üÊ®ÄêÀ´,ÎÒ¹úÅ©´åÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨Á÷תµÄÏÖÏóÓɾֲ¿µ½È«Ãæ,ÈÕÒæÅչ¿ª,´Ùʹũ´å¾­¼ÃÏòũҵ²úÒµ»¯Âõ½ø,Ôö¼ÓÁËÅ©ÃñÊÕÈë,ÍØ¿íÁËũҵ½¨Éè֮·¡£µ«ÊÇ,һЩµØ·½È´³öÏÖÁËÅ©´åÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨Á÷תÖÐËðº¦Å©Ãñ²Æ²úȨÀûµÄ¸ºÃæÎÊÌâ,²¢Òý·¢ÁËΪÊý²»Éٵķ¨ÂɾÀ·×¡£±±¾©µØÇø»ù²ãÈËÃñ·¨ÔºÂ½ÐøÉóÀíÁ˶àÆðÅ©´åÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨¾À·×°¸¼þ,ÆäÖеÄÈô¸É·¨ÂÉÎÊÌâÖµµÃ·¨Ñ§½ç´ÓÀíÂÛºÍʵÎñ½áºÏµÄ½Ç¶È½øÐÐÉîÈëÑо¿,ÒÔÆÚѰÕÒ³öÍêÉÆÏà¹Ø·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈµÄ¶Ô²ß¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ During the last ten years, circulation of rural land rights to contracted management develops from parts to almost all areas in China, which has made the rural economy into the age of agricultural industrialization while improving the peasants¡¯ incomes and broadening the way of agricultural construction. But there are still many problems in circulation of the rural land rights to contracted management in many places, which initiates many legal disputes.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Å©´åÍÁµØ³Ð°ü¾­ÓªÈ¨Á÷×ªÖÆ¶È£» ·¨ÂÉÎÊÌ⣻
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ system of circulation of rural land rights to contracted management legal problems£»
     
    10 ¡¢ÊÔÂÛÎÒ¹úÅ©´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨµÄÁ÷ת  ¹ØÊç·¼£¨ÖйúÇàÄêÕþÖÎѧԺ£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Å©´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨµÄÁ÷תÊÇÀíÂÛ½çºÍʵÎñ½ç³¤ÆÚ¹Ø×¢µÄ½¹µãÎÊÌâ,±¾ÎÄ´ÓÅ©´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÁ÷תµÄÏÖ×´ÈëÊÖ,¼òÒª·ÖÎöÁËÎÒ¹úÏÖÐз¨Âɽûֹũ´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨ½øÈëÍÁµØ½»Ò×Ò»¼¶Êг¡Á÷תµÄ±×¶Ë,×îºó½áºÏÃñ·¨¼ÛÖµÅжÏÎÊÌâµÄʵÌåÐÔÂÛÖ¤¹æÔòÂÛÖ¤ÁËÔÊÐíÅ©´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÒÀ·¨×ÔÓÉÁ÷תµÄÕýµ±ÐÔ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Circulation of China rural collective construction land right of use has been a key problem in China for a long time. This paper focuses on the practical situation of the circulation of China rural collective construction land right of use, analyzing the deficiency of forbidding the circulation of China rural collective construction land right of use under modern China¡¯s legal system, including some other civil value judgment. And finally we get such a conclusion that the circulation of China rural collective construction land right of use should be freely allowed according to law.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨ£» ƽµÈ£» ×ÔÓÉÁ÷ת£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ circulation of China rural collective construction land right of use the principle of equality free circulation£»
     
    11 ¡¢¡°Ð¡²úȨ·¿¡±ÃæÁٵķ¨ÂÉÄÑÌâ¼°ÆäÆÆ½â  ÁõÏþϼ£¨¸ÊËàÕþ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ "С²úȨ·¿"ÊÇÎÒ¹ú½üÄêÀ´³öÏÖµÄÉç»áÏÖÏó,È»¶øÆäÔÚ½¨Éè¼°½»Ò×¹ý³ÌÖÐÃæÁÙ×ÅÖî¶à·¨ÂÉÉϵÄÄÑÌâ¡£ÕâЩÄÑÌâ±íÃ÷ÎÒ¹ú¼¯ÌåÍÁµØËùÓÐȨ±»ÐéÖÃ,½¨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÁ÷ת»úÖÆÒ಻½¡È«¡£ÒªÆÆ½âÕâЩ·¨ÂÉÄÑÌâ,Ó¦µ±¸³ÓèÅ©´å¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÒÔÍêÈ«ÓÃÒæÎïȨЧÁ¦,¹¹½¨³ÇÏçÆ½µÈµÄ½¨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÁ÷×ªÖÆ¶È;´´Ð¼¯ÌåÍÁµØËùÓÐȨºÍʹÓÃȨÖ÷ÌåÖÆ¶È,È·±£ËùÓÐȨȨÄܵÄʵÏÖ;ÍêÉÆÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕÖÆ¶È,½ûֹΪ"ÉÌÒµÀûÒæ"¶øÕ÷ÊÕ;¹¹½¨¿ÆÑ§µÄ³ÇÏçÍÁµØÀûÓÃ¹æ»®ÖÆ¶È,ͬʱÕþ¸®Ó¦µ±ÈÃÀûÓÚÃñ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ As a social phenomenon, housing without real estate ownership has come up in China in recent years. But it faces many legal difficulties during the process of construction and transaction. These legal difficulties indicate that collective land ownership is emptied, and the alienation of right to use construction land is unsound. In order to surmount these difficulties, we should endow rural collective right to use construction land with complete effect of usufructuary right to construct equal system of the alienation of right to use construction land between urban and rural areas. We should create subject systems of collective land ownership and collective right to use land to implement rights of ownership. Systems of requisition lands should be improved and the requisition for business benefit should be prohibited. The planning system to use land should be constructed in urban and rural areas scientifically. Government should give civil subjects opportunities for benefit.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ С²úȨ·¿£» ÓÃÒæÎïȨ£» ¼¯Ì彨ÉèÓõØÊ¹ÓÃȨÁ÷ת£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ housing without real estate ownership usufructuary right the alienation of collective right to use construction land£»
     
    12 ¡¢½ðÈÚÏû·ÑÕß±£»¤ÌåÖÆ¼°ÆäÏà¹ØÎÊÌâ  µË¸Ù£¨Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧ¾­¼Ã·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ 2008Ä걬·¢µÄ½ðÈÚΣ»úÒý·¢ÁËÊÀ½ç¸÷¹ú¶Ô½ðÈÚÏû·ÑÕß±£»¤ÎÊÌâµÄ¹Ø×¢¡£½ðÈÚ²úÆ·»ò·þÎñµÄÏû·ÑÌØµãʹÏû·ÑÕßÐèÒªµÃµ½¸üרҵºÍ¸üϸÖµļà¹Ü±£»¤,Õâ¶Ô¼à¹Ü»ú¹¹µÄ×éÖ¯ÌåÖÆºÍÖ°Äܽ¨ÉèÌá³öÁ˸ü¸ßµÄÒªÇó¡£µ±Ç°¶Ô½ðÈÚÏû·ÑÕß±£»¤ÌåÖÆÖ÷ÒªÓзÖÒµ¹ÜÀí¡¢×ۺϹÜÀíºÍרÃŹÜÀíÈýÖÖģʽ,½è¼ø½ðÈÚ·¢´ï¹ú¼Ò¾­Ñé,ÎÒ¹ú¿ÉÒÔÑ¡ÔñÔÚ·ÖÒµ¼à¹Ü²¿ÃÅÄÚÉè»ú¹¹µÄ·½°¸,ͬʱ¼ÓÇ¿½ðÈÚ֪ʶµÄÆÕ¼°ºÍ½ÌÓý,´ý»ù±¾±£»¤Ö°ÄܽÏΪÍêÉÆ¡¢¾­ÑéÏà¶Ô³ÉÊìºóͨ¹ýרÃÅÁ¢·¨ÊµÏÖ½ðÈÚÏû·ÑÕß±£»¤ÌåÖÆµÄרÃŹÜÀíģʽ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Financial crisis triggered attention to consumer financial protection over the world. The features of current financial consuming market indicate that the consumers need more protection than in the past. The corresponding regulating authorities and functions shall be the base of the whole legal framework. In this respect, Canada and USA take its place in front ranks of the world. Both Canada & USA established specialized legislatures and executive organizations, and put the financial literacy as priority. These are good experiences deserving our attention.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ½ðÈÚÏû·ÑÕߣ» ÌåÖÆ£» ½ðÈÚËØÑø£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ consumer financial protection organization and system basic function£»
     
    13 ¡¢ÎÒ¹úÆóÒµÀûÓÃÍâ¹úÖ±½ÓͶ×Ê·çÏÕÑо¿¡ª¡ªÒÔÎ÷±±Öá³Ð³§Òý×ʽÌѵΪÀý  ФÖܼ;Íõ¾ê£¨Î÷±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÀûÓÃÍâ×Ê(FDI)²¢²»×ÜÄÜʵÏÖÀíÏ뻯µÄ»¥Àû¹²Ó®¾ÖÃæ,ÕâÒ»µãÔÚѧ½çÑо¿ÖйúÀûÓÃÍâ×ÊÈýÊ®¶àÄêµÄ¾ßÌåʵ¼ùÖÐÒѾ­µÃµ½Ó¡Ö¤¡£ÀûÓÃÍâ¹úÖ±½ÓͶ×ÊÉèÁ¢ºÏ×ÊÆóÒµµÄ·çÏÕ±íÏÖΪºÏ×ÊÆóÒµÔËÓª¹ý³ÌÖÐÌØ±ðÊǺÏ×ÊÆóҵת±äΪ¶À×ÊÆóҵʱ¶ÔÖз½Í¶×ÊÖ÷ÌåµÄÈ¨Òæ¿ÉÄÜÔì³ÉµÄÓ°Ïì¡£ÔÚ¹ú¼Ò½øÒ»²½ÓÅ»¯ÍâÉÌͶ×Ê»·¾³,ÎüÒýÍâ×ʵı³¾°ÏÂ,ÈçºÎά»¤Öз½Í¶×ÊÖ÷ÌåÔÚºÏ×ÊÆóÒµÖеĺϷ¨È¨Òæ,ÊÇÖµµÃÉîÈëÑо¿µÄÎÊÌâ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Utilizing foreign direct investment (FDI) cannot always realize the mutual beneficial and double-winning situation, which has been proved in China¡¯s research area during utilizing the foreign direct investment in practice over the last 30 years. Foreign direct investment sets up the risks of joint venture enterprises that would reduce our profits in the process of its operation, especially when the joint venture enterprises turn into the owned enterprises. How to remain our legitimate rights and interests in joint-venture is worth researching, with the background of further optimizing the environment for investment and attracting foreign investment in China.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÀûÓÃÍâ×Ê£» ºÏ×Ê·çÏÕ£» ¶À×Ê£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ utilize foreign investment risks of joint venture enterprises owned enterprises£»
     
    14 ¡¢·¿µØ²úµÄ²ÆË°·¨µ÷¿ØÑо¿  Íõƽ;Áõ»ÛÓ£¨±±¾©ÁªºÏ´óѧ£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¶Ô·¿µØ²úµ÷¿ØµÄ˰ÊÕ´ëÊ©Ïà¶Ô±È½ÏÍêÉÆ,µ«"ÍÁµØ²ÆÕþ"È´Ïû½âÁ˲¿·Ö˰ÊÕµ÷¿Ø×÷Óá£Òª¸Ä¸ï²ÆÕþÌåÖÆ,ÔÚÌåÖÆÄÚÔöÇ¿µØ·½²ÆÁ¦,¸Ä±äµØ·½¶Ô"ÍÁµØ²ÆÕþ"µÄÒÀÀµ,È¡Ïû¶Ô¸öÈË×Ôס·¿²úÃâÄÉ·¿²ú˰µÄ¹æ¶¨,Ç¿»¯ÍÁµØÔö˰ÇåËã¡¢ÍêÉÆ²¢ÑϸñÖ´ÐÐ"¶þÊÖ·¿"½»Ò×Ïà¹ØË°ÊÕÕþ²ß,½µµÍ·¿²ú½»Ò×¼Û¸ñ,ÒÖÖÆÍ¶»ú¹º·¿,·¢»Ó²ÆË°ÖƶȶԷ¿µØ²úµÄµ÷¿Ø×÷Óá£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The regulation of real estate by tax has material functions, but land finance decrease these functions. We should change the financial system, increase local government receipts so that they will not depend on land finance so much, impose property tax, improve land taxation clearing system, perfect second-hand house exchange policy, decrease house price, control investment on commercial residential building, and make taxation to be an effective tool for regulation of real estate.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ˰ÊÕ£» ÍÁµØ²ÆÕþ£» ·¿µØ²úµ÷¿Ø£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ taxation land finance regulation on real estate£»
     
    15 ¡¢Éç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹µÄ·¨Âɶ¨Î»  Ò¶¾²äô;Ф¾©£¨±±¾©´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÒ¹ú¡¶Éç»á±£ÏÕ·¨¡·µÄ˳ÀûʵʩÊÜÖÆÓÚÉç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹¹ÜÀíÌåÖÆµÄ˳³©Óë·ñ¡£ÎÒ¹úÒÔǰÁ¢·¨¶ÔÉç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹µÄÐÔÖʺÍÖ°Äܵķ¨Âɶ¨Î»²»Ã÷,¶ø¡¶Éç»á±£ÏÕ·¨¡·»Ø±ÜÁËÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâ,Ö±½ÓÓ°Ïìµ½Éç»á±£ÏÕÒµÎñµÄ°ìÀí¡£Òò´Ë,ºÜÓбØÒªÔÚÀíÂÛÉ϶ÔÉç»á±£ÏÕ»ú¹¹µÄÐÔÖʺÍÖ°ÄܽøÐж¨Î»,²¢ÔÚÁ¢·¨ÉÏÓèÒÔÃ÷È·¡£Í¨¹ý¶ÔÉç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹ÏÖ×´ºÍÏÖÐÐÁ¢·¨Ïà¹ØÌõÎĵķÖÎö¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö,ÎÒ¹úÉç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹Ó¦¸Ã¶¨Î»ÎªÒÔ·þÎñΪÖ÷µ«¾ßÓÐÐÐÕþ¹ÜÀíÖ°ÄܵÄÊÂÒµµ¥Î»¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The smooth implementation of the social insurance law depends on the smooth management system of social insurance agency. The legal status of social insurance agency was ambiguous in the legislation of China and the social insurance law evaded this question. This situation affects the transaction processing of social insurance. So it is necessary to position the nature and function in theory and define it in legislation. From the analysis of the current situation of social insurance agency and the articles of existing legislation, it can be seen that the legal status of social insurance agency should be public institution with both service and administration function.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Éç»á±£ÏÕ¾­°ì»ú¹¹£» ÐÔÖÊ£» Ö°ÄÜ£» ·¨Âɶ¨Î»£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ social insurance agency nature function legal status£»
     
    16 ¡¢ÎÒ¹ú½¨Á¢Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈµÄ˼¿¼  ¿Â骣¨ÐÅÑôÖ°Òµ¼¼ÊõѧԺ£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÒ¹úµÄÅ©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏÖÆ¶ÈÔøÓйý»Ô»Í,Ò²ÔâÓö¹ý´ìÕÛ¡£½¨Á¢Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈÊÇÈËȨÊÂÒµ·¢Õ¹¡¢ºÍгÉç»á¹¹½¨¡¢ÊµÏÖũҵÏÖ´ú»¯¡¢½â¾öÅ©ÃñÒò²¡·µÆ¶¡¢ËõС³ÇÏç¾ÓÃñ½¡¿µ²î¾àµÄÐèÒª¡£½ü¼¸Äê,Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏÖÆ¶È¡ªÐÂÐÍÅ©´åºÏ×÷Ò½ÁƵÄÊÔµãÍÆÐÐ,ΪÎÒÃÇÖÆ¶¨¡¶Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨¡·ÌṩÁËÁ¢·¨¾­Ñé¡£½¨Á¢Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶È,Ó¦¼á³Ö¿ÆÑ§Ô­Ôò,´Ó·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶È½¨ÉèÈëÊÖ,ÒÀ·¨Íƽø,±£³ÖÅ©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏÖÆ¶È¹æ·¶¡¢ÓÐÐò¡¢ÓÐЧ¡£Í¬Ê±,Òª¼ÓÇ¿ÓëÅ©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈÏàÊÊÓ¦µÄÅäÌ×ÖÆ¶È¸Ä¸ï½¨É蹤×÷,ÒÔ±£Ö¤Å©ÃñÒ½ÁƱ£ÕÏ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈÂ䵽ʵ´¦¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ China¡¯s rural medical security system has been brilliant, but also encountered setbacks. Establishing rural medical security legal system is the cause of human rights development. Building a harmonious society, realizing agricultural modernization, solving farmers¡¯ problems of medical care, etc., we need such legislation for farmers¡¯ medical insurance in China badly. In recent years, the farmers¡¯ medical security system - the new rural cooperative medical pilot, i.e., "the farmers¡¯ medical security law" provides legislative experience. Establishing rural medical security legal system, we should adhere to scientific principles, from the legal system to building proceed with, to promote, maintain farmers¡¯ medical security system standard orderly and effectively. At the same time, we must strengthen the farmers¡¯ medical security legal system for its realization practically.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Å©Ãñ£» Ò½ÁƱ£ÕÏ£» ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶È£» ˼¿¼£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ farmers medical security legal system thinking£»
     
    17 ¡¢ÂÛÎÒ¹úÏÖÐÐҩƷרÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿ÉÁ¢·¨µÄ²»×ãÓëÍêÉÆ  »ÆÀöƼ£¨¹ã¶«ÍâÓïÍâó´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ãæ¶Ô°¬×̲¡¡¢SARS¡¢ÇÝÁ÷¸ÐµÈ´ó¹æÄ£´«È¾ÐÔ¼²²¡¶Ô¹«¹²½¡¿µ°²È«µÄÍþв,ÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯ÒÔ¼°¸÷¹ú·×·×¼ÓǿҩƷרÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿ÉÁ¢·¨,µ±È»,ÎÒ¹úÒ²²»ÀýÍâ¡£µ«ÊÇ,ÎÒ¹úÏÖÐÐҩƷרÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿ÉÖÆ¶È,ÈÔÈ»´æÔÚÁ¢·¨²ã´Î¹ý¶à¡¢°ä·¢ÊÂÓɲ»Ã÷È·¡¢ÉêÇëÖ÷Ìå¹ýÕ­µÈ²»×ã,ÔÚ½ñºó½øÒ»²½ÍêÉÆÏà¹ØÁ¢·¨Ê±,Ó¦¿¼ÂÇÔÚרÀû·¨ÖжÔҩƷרÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿É×ö³öרÃŵÄ¡¢ÍêÕûµÄ¹æ¶¨,²¢Ã÷È·½«¹«¹²½¡¿µÀûÒæÐèÒª×÷Ϊ°ä·¢×¨ÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿ÉµÄÊÂÓÉ,ÒÔ¼°ÔÊÐíÈκε¥Î»ºÍ¸öÈ˳ÉΪҩƷרÀûÇ¿ÖÆÐí¿ÉµÄÉêÇëÖ÷Ìå¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Faced with the threat of Aids, SARS, Bird Flu and other large-scale infectious diseases to public health and safety, WTO and many countries, of course including China, have strengthened their legislation on compulsory licensing of pharmaceutics patent. However, in China, there are still some limitations of the current compulsory licensing system of pharmaceutics patent, such as excessive levels of legislation, unclear cause of issuing the law, and limited varieties of applicants, etc. For further improvement of the relevant legislation in the future, it is suggested that, first of all, specialized and complete regulations should be made with regard to compulsory licensing of pharmaceutics patent. Secondly, the beneficial needs of public health should be claimed clear as the cause of issuing patent compulsory licensing. And additionally, any unit and individual should be allowed to be applicant for compulsory licensing of pharmaceutics patent.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Ç¿ÖÆÐí¿É£» Á¢·¨Ä£Ê½£» ÊÂÓÉ£» ÉêÇëÖ÷Ì壻 ¹«¹²½¡¿µ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ compulsory licensing legislation mode cause applicant public health£»
     
    18 ¡¢Ç³ÎöÎÒ¹úËÀÐÌÁ¿ÐÌÌåϵÖо­¼ÃÅâ³¥µÄºÏÀíÐÔÓë¾ÖÏÞÐÔ  ·ë´ºÆ¼£¨º£ÄÏʦ·¶´óѧÕô·¢Ñ§Ôº£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ °´ÕÕÎÒ¹ú¡¶ÐÌ·¨¡·µÄ¹æ¶¨,ÐÌ·£µÄ±¾ÖÊÊÇ»ùÓÚÐÌÊÂÔðÈζԱ»¸æÈËÓèÒԳͷ£±¨Ó¦,ͬʱ,ÐÌ·£µÄÄ¿µÄÔÚÓÚͨ¹ý¼õÉÙ±»¸æÈ˵ÄÔÙ·¸¿ÉÄÜÐÔʵÏÖÔ¤·À·¸×ͬÑù,×÷ΪʵÏÖÐÌ·£¹ý³ÌµÄÁ¿ÐÌÒ²Ó¦ÔÚÕâÖÖ"±¾ÖÊ"ºÍ"Ä¿µÄ"µÄÌåϵÖнøÐС£ÈËÃñ·¨ÔºÔÚ¶ÔËÀÐ̰¸¼þ½øÐÐÁ¿ÐÌʱ¾ö¶¨ÊÇ·ñ½«¼Óº¦·½¼°Æä¼ÒÊôµÈ»ý¼«½øÐо­¼ÃÅâ³¥µÄÐÐΪ×÷Ϊ×ö¨Çé½ÚÓèÒÔ¿¼ÂÇʱ,Ò²Ó¦¸ÃÊ×ÏÈ´ÓÁ¿Ð̵ÄÕâÖÖ"±¾ÖÊ"ºÍ"Ä¿µÄ"µÄÌåϵ³ö·¢À´ÅжÏ¡£¾ßÌ嵨½²,¾­¼ÃÅâ³¥Ö»ÓÐÓë°¸¼þµÄ"·¸×ïÊÂʵ"ÓÐ×ÅÄÚÔÚ¹ØÁªÐÔ,±¾À´ÊôÓÚ°¸¼þ"¶¨×ïÁ¿ÐÌ"µÄÒªËØÊ±,²¢ÇÒ,Ö»Óн«ÆäÖÃÓÚÕû¸öÁ¿ÐÌÌåϵÏÂ,ÔÚÓëÆäËûÖÚ¶àµÄÁ¿ÐÌÒªËØµÄÏ໥¹ØÏµÖб»È϶¨È·Êµ¾ßÓÐÖ±½ÓÓ°Ïì±»¸æÈ˵ĹýÈ¥×ïÔð(ÐÌÊÂÔðÈÎ)¼°Æä½«À´Ô¤·À(ÔÙ·¸¿ÉÄÜÐÔ)µÄÒâÒåʱ,²Å¿ÉÒÔ×÷ΪËÀÐÌÁ¿Ð̵Ä×ö¨Çé½ÚÓèÒÔ¿¼ÂÇ,²Å¿ÉÒÔ³ÉΪÉ÷ÓÃËÀÐÌÁ¢¼´Ö´ÐжøÑ¡ÔñËÀÐÌ»ºÆÚÁ½ÄêÖ´ÐеÄÀíÓÉ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ According to China¡¯s criminal law, the essence of criminal penalty is to do retribution to the criminal, and its goal is to prevent the criminal from conducting crime again. So, sentencing, as the concrete process to make criminal penalty realized, should also be made in the formation of "retributive essence" and "preventive goal." In a death case, the court should act in the same way when it tries to consider compensation as a factor to determine whether a death penalty should be issued. Compensation can be considered as a reason to choose a sentencing of death penalty with a two years suspended execution rather than death penalty with an immediate execution, only in the case that the compensation reflects the reduction of criminal responsibility and the increase of criminals¡¯ regret.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ËÀÐÌÁ¿ÐÌ£» ¾­¼ÃÅâ³¥£» ÈËÃñ·¨Ôº²ÃÁ¿È¨£» ×ö¨Çé½Ú£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ death penalty compensation discretion selective element£»
     
    19 ¡¢×ÔÊ×ÖÆ¶ÈÖе¥Î»ÒòËØµÄ½éÈë¼°Æä˼¿¼  Àî¶«£¨±±¾©Êй«°²¾Ö£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ µ¥Î»·¸×ïÒÔºóÊÇ·ñ´æÔÚ×ÔÊ×µÄÎÊÌâ,ÐÌ·¨Ñ§½çÉÐÓнϴóÕùÒé¡£ÏÖÐÐÐÌ·¨¶Ôµ¥Î»×ÔÊ×ÎÞÃ÷È·¹æ¶¨,µ«ÒÑÓÐ˾·¨½âÊͶԲ¿·Ö·¸×ï¹æ¶¨Á˵¥Î»×ÔÊס£±¾ÎÄ´ÓÂß¼­±ØÈ»ÐÔ¡¢¸ÅÄî¼°ÒâÒ塢˾·¨È϶¨¼°ÏàÓ¦µÄÁ¢·¨ÍêÉÆ·½Ãæ¶Ôµ¥Î»×ÔÊ×½øÐÐÁ˼òÒª·ÖÎöÂÛÊö¡£¡¶ÐÌ·¨¡·Ó¦½«µ¥Î»×ÔÊ×ÄÚº­Ã÷È·»¯¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ It is still in big dispute in the criminal law field whether the surrender issue exists after the crimes are committed by an organization. There is not any clear definition of the organization surrender in current criminal law, but there is actually judicial interpretation about it in some crimes. This article gives a brief statement and analysis of the organization surrender from aspects of logical necessity, concept and significance, judicial cognizance and corresponding improvement of legislation.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ µ¥Î»·¸× µ¥Î»×ÔÊ×£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ crimes committed by an unit organization surrender£»
     
    20 ¡¢¡¶ÃñÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·ÐÞ¸ÄÓë²»ÓèÖ´ÐÐÖٲòþö¡ª¡ªÒÔ±±¾©ÖÙ²ÃίԱ»áΪ¶ÔÏóµÄʵ֤·ÖÎö  ÍõÑÇУ¨Ç廪´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;³Â¸£Ó£¨±±¾©ÖÙ²ÃίԱ»á£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ŀǰѧ½çºÍÖٲýç¶Ô¡¶ÃñÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·µÚ213Ìõ¹æ¶¨µÄ²»ÓèÖ´ÐÐÖٲòþöµÄÌõ¼þÊÇ·ñÐ޸ļ°ÔõÑùÐ޸ĴæÔڽϴóÕùÒ顣ΪÁ˸øÏà¹ØÌÖÂÛÌṩÓÐÒæËØ²Ä,ÓбØÒªÈ¡µÃÀ´×ÔÖٲü°Ë¾·¨Êµ¼ùµÄµÚÒ»ÊÖ×ÊÁϲ¢×÷ʵ֤ÐԵĿ¼²ì¡£Í¨¹ý¶Ô±±¾©ÖÙ²ÃίԱ»á1995-2010ÄêÖٲòþö±»²»ÓèÖ´ÐеIJö¨½øÐзÖÎö·¢ÏÖ,Ó°Ïì²»ÓèÖ´ÐеÄÒòËØÊǶàÔªµÄ¡£´ÓʵÎñµÄÊӽdzö·¢,ÖÁÉÙÓ¦°ÑµÚ213ÌõµÚ(ËÄ)¿îÇ£ÉæÊÂʵÈ϶¨µÄÊÂÓÉͳһµ½¡¶Öٲ÷¨¡·µÚ58Ìõ×÷Ϊ³·ÏúÖٲòþöÊÂÓɵÄ"αÔì»òÒþÂ÷Ö¤¾Ý"µÄ¹æ¶¨ÉÏÈ¥¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ There is much debate currently on how to revise the grounds for non-enforcing arbitral award stipulated in article 213 of China civil procedural law. To provide beneficial reference for related discussion, it is necessary to do an empirical analysis of the first-hand data from the arbitration and judicial practice. Study on rulings concerned with the non-enforcement of the awards issued by Beijing Arbitration Commission from 1995 to 2010 expresses that factors illustrating the non-enforcement of an award are diverse. From the perspective of practice, at least the ground related to fact finding stipulated in Article 213 (4) should be changed into "falsifying or concealing evidence" which is stipulated as grounds of setting aside award in Article 58 of China arbitration law.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¡¶ÃñÊÂËßËÏ·¨¡·Ð޸ģ» ²»ÓèÖ´ÐÐÖٲòþö£» ¡¶ÃñËß·¨¡·µÚ213Ìõ¹æ¶¨ÊÂÓÉ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ non-enforcement of arbitral award revising civil procedural law article 213 of civil procedural law£»
     
    21 ¡¢ÐÌÊÂÈÏÖ¤ÈçºÎ½øÐСª¡ªÒÔÈÏÖªÐÄÀíѧΪÑо¿½øÂ·  ºúÓîÇå;ÀîÈØ£¨ÏæÌ¶´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Á˽âÈÏÖ¤µÄÐγɹý³ÌÊÇÍêÉÆÈÏÖ¤ÖÆ¶ÈµÄ»ù´¡¡£ÈÏÖªÐÄÀíѧÈÏΪ,ÈÏÖ¤µÄ¹ý³Ì¾ÍÊÇÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ½â¾öµÄ¹ý³Ì¡£ÓÉÓÚÈçºÎÕýÈ·ÈÏÖ¤ÊôÓÚ·ÇÃ÷È·ÏÞ¶¨ÐÔÎÊÌâ,¾ßÓÐÄ£ºýÐÔ,Òò´ËÐè¸ü¶àµØÒÀ¿¿Æô·¢Ê½²ßÂÔÀ´½â¾ö,ÈÏÖ¤½áÂÛÊܵ½¶àÖÖÒòËØµÄÓ°Ïì,ÈÏÖ¤±ê×¼ÊÇÄÚÐÄÈ·ÐÅ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Understanding the formation process of certification is to improve the certification basis of the system. Cognitive psychology sticks that the certification process is a problem-solving process. How to properly certify as non-clearly defined issues, with ambiguity, therefore, rely more on heuristic strategies, certified by a variety of factors influence. The certification standards are the certification in the inner heart.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÌÊÂÈÏÖ¤£» ·ÇÃ÷È·ÏÞ¶¨ÐÔÎÊÌ⣻ Æô·¢Ê½²ßÂÔ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ criminal attestation non-clearly defined problems heuristic strategy£»
     
    22 ¡¢ÎÒ¹ú·¨Ôº¶Ô¡¶ÁªºÏ¹ú¹ú¼Ê»õÎïÏúÊÛºÏͬ¹«Ô¼¡·µÄÊÊÓà ÐûÔöÒæ;ÍõÑÓåû£¨ÖйúÕþ·¨´óѧ¹ú¼Ê·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ëæ×Åͳһ·¨Ö®·çÊ¢ÐÐ,¡¶ÁªºÏ¹ú¹ú¼Ê»õÎïÏúÊÛºÏͬ¹«Ô¼¡·µÄ³ÉÔ±¹úÒѱ鲼ȫÇò,¼¸ºõËùÓÐóÒ×´ó¹ú¶¼²ÎÓëÆäÖС£ÎÒ¹ú×÷Ϊ´´Ê¼³ÉÔ±¹úÔÚ¹«Ô¼µÄ˾·¨Êµ¼ùÖаçÑÝ×ÅÖØÒª½ÇÉ«¡£µ«ÓÉÓÚ²¿·Ö·¨¹Ù¹ú¼Ê·¨ÖªÊ¶Ïà¶Ôȱ·¦,ÔÚ¹«Ô¼µÄÊÊÓ÷½Ãæ°ÑÎÕ²»×¼¡£ÎÄÕÂѡȡÈô¸ÉµäÐÍÅоö,´Ó¹«Ô¼µÄÖ±½ÓÊÊÓúÍÑ¡ÔñÊÊÓÃÁ½·½ÃæÖ¸³öÕýÈ·µÄ¹«Ô¼ÊÊÓ÷½·¨,²¢Í¨¹ý¶Ô¹«Ô¼Óë¹úÄÚ·¨µÄÏνӺÍÖйú¶ÔµÚÒ»ÌõµÚ1¿î(b)ÏîµÄ±£ÁôµÈÖйú»¯ÎÊÌâµÄ·ÖÎö,Ã÷È·ÁËÎÒ¹ú·¨ÔºÔÚÊÊÓÃCISG¹«Ô¼Ê±Ó¦×¢ÒâµÄһЩÎÊÌâ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Along with the global trend of uniform law, the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, has obtained a large membership, with almost all leading trade nations involved. China, as a founding member, plays an indispensable role in the judicial practice of this Convention. But because of a relative lack of knowledge in international law, some judges may not apply this convention properly. This article analyzes several typical cases and points out the appropriate ways of CISG application from direct and selective perspectives. Considering China internal law and reservation of subparagraph (1)(b) of article 1, some noticeable issues are also clarified.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ CISG£» ¹«Ô¼ÊÊÓã» Öйú˾·¨Êµ¼ù£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ CISG application of the convention judicial practice in China£»
     
    23 ¡¢´Ó¹«¹²ÖÈÐòµÄÏÞÖÆÊÊÓÃÇ÷ÊÆÎöÎÒ¹úÓйØÁ¢·¨Ö®ÍêÉÆ  ÂíµÂ²Å£¨½­Î÷²Æ¾­´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¹«¹²ÖÈÐòËäÒòÆäʵÖÊÔÚÓÚά»¤±¾¹ú¹ú¼Ò¼°ÆäÈËÃñµÄÀûÒæ¶ø±»³ÆÎª¹ú¼Ê˽·¨ÖеÄ"°²È«·§",µ«ÓÉÓÚËüȱ·¦Ò»¸öÈ·¶¨¡¢Í³Ò»µÄ¸ÅÄîÓëÊÊÓñê×¼,Òò¶ø¸ÃÖÆ¶ÈÔÚʵ¼ùÖÐÈÝÒ×±»ÀÄÓ᣶ø¹«¹²ÖÈÐòµÄÀÄÓÃÊÆ±Ø´ó´ó½µµÍ¹ú¼Ê˽·¨ÔÚЭµ÷¸÷¹ú·¨ÂɳåÍ»ÖеļÛÖµ,·Á°­¹ú¼ÊÃñʽ»ÍùµÄÎȶ¨ºÍ°²È«¡£ÕýÊÇÒòΪÈç´Ë,ËùÒÔÓбØÒª¶Ô¹«¹²ÖÈÐò¼ÓÒÔÏÞÖÆÊÊÓÃ,ÕâÒµÒѳÉΪ¹«¹²ÖÈÐòµÄ·¢Õ¹Ç÷ÊÆÖ®Ò»¡£ÎÒ¹úÓйØÁ¢·¨Ò²Ó¦¸Ã˳ӦÕâÒ»·¢Õ¹Ç÷ÊÆ¼ÓÒÔÍêÉÆ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Although the public order is known as the "safety valve" of private international law owing to its safeguarding the interests of the home nation and its people in essence, it is to be abused easily in practice because of its lack of a firm, unified concepts and applicable standards, The abuse of public order is bound to greatly reduce the value of private international law in the course of coordination of conflict of laws, hinder the stability of the international civil exchanges. That is why it is necessary to limit the application of public order, and it is one of the development trends of public order. The relevant legislations should conform to this development trend and to be improved accordingly.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¹ú¼Ê˽·¨£» ¹«¹²ÖÈÐò£» ÏÞÖÆÊÊÓã» Á¢·¨ÍêÉÆ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ private international law public order limited application legislation improvement£»
     
     
    24 ¡¢ÈÕ±¾¸£µººËй©Ê¹ʵķ¨ÂÉʡ˼  ·¶´¿£¨ºÚÁú½­´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;  
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÈÕ±¾¸£µººËй©Ê¹ʵķ¢ÉúÓÐÆäÀúÊ·µÄ±ØÈ»ÐÔ,ÊÇÉÏÊÀ¼Í50Äê´ú½¨Á¢µÄÈÕ±¾Ê½¾­¼ÃÌåÖÆ±×¶ËÔں˵çÁìÓòµÄÕÛÉä¡£ÉóÊÓÈÕ±¾70Äê´ú½¨Á¢µÄºËµç¼à¶½ÌåÖÆ,ÆäЧÂÊÐÔ´æÔÚ²»×ã,¼Ó֮˾·¨êÓÃÁ,Ò»¶¨³Ì¶ÈÉÏÖúÍÆÁËʹʵķ¢Éú¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Japan Fukushima nuclear leak accident has its historical inevitability. It is the reflection of Japanese economic system¡¯s abuse that established in the 1950s in the field of nuclear power. Looking at the supervision system of Japan¡¯s nuclear power that made in 1970s, it has some defects of efficient shortcoming, of judicial lack of justice. These factors to a certain extent promote the occurrence of the accident.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÈÕ±¾ºËʹÊ£» ºËµçÕþ²ß£» ¼à¹ÜÌåÖÆ£» ºËµçËßËÏ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ Japan nuclear accident policy of nuclear power regulatory regime nuclear power litigation£»
     
    25 ¡¢ÂÛ½ûÌÖÇø¡ª¡ªÏÜ·¨Ñ§ÊÓ½Çϵķ´Ë¼ÓëÐÞÕý  ÂÀöΣ¨Õã½­¹¤Òµ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÏÖ½ñÆÕ±éÉèÁ¢µÄ½ûÌÖÇø´æÔÚÕùÒé,¶øÏÜ·¨Ñ§µÄÊÓ½ÇÔòÈÏΪÕþ¸®¹ÌÈ»ÓÐά»¤¹«¹²ÖÈÐòµÄȨÁ¦,µ«ÄÇЩÒÔά»¤ÉúÃü°²È«ÎªÄ¿µÄµÄÆòÌÖÐÐΪͬÑùÊܵ½ÉúÃüȨµÄ±£»¤,ÓÉ´ËÔÚȨÁ¦ÓëȨÀû½»»ã֮ʱ±ØÐë½÷É÷µÄȨºâ¡£¶øÏÖ½ñµÄ½ûÌÖÇøÔòÍùÍùºöÊÓÁËÆòÌÖÕßµÄȨÀû,²¢ÇÖ·¸ÁËÆäÉúÃüȨºÍƽµÈȨ¡£µ«²»µÃÇÖ·¸²¢²»µÈÓÚ²»µÃÏÞÖÆ,ÒÔ×ðÖØÆòÌÖÕßµÄȨÀûΪǰÌá,ͨ¹ýÐÞÕýÈÔ¿ÉÌá³öÒ»ÖÖºÏÏܵĽûÌÖÇø¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The prevalence of the "no-begging zone" in China is controversial. In the view of the science of constitution, the government has no doubt authority and right to maintain public order, but the beggars are also protected by the right of subsistence with the purpose of maintaining their own lives. It must be comprehensively and cautiously balanced. Nowadays, the so-called "no-begging zone" have ignored beggars¡¯ rights and violated their right to life and equality. But if legislators take seriously of beggars¡¯ rights, a constitutional "no-begging zone "still can be legislated to limit begging.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ½ûÌÖÇø£» ÆòÌÖÐÐΪ£» ºÏÏÜÐÔ£» ÉúÃüȨ£» ƽµÈȨ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ no-begging zone begging constitutional right of subsistence equal right£»
     
    26 ¡¢ÊÔÂÛÎÒ¹úÎÞЧ»éÒöÁ¢·¨µÄȱÏݼ°ÍêÉÆ  ÍõСӢ£¨É½Î÷Õþ·¨¸É²¿¹ÜÀíѧԺ£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÒ¹ú¡¶»éÒö·¨¡·ËäÈ»ÓÐÎÞЧ»éÒöµÄ¹æ¶¨,µ«Á¢·¨ÉÏÈÔÈ»´æÔÚһЩȱÏÝ,¸øË¾·¨Êµ¼ù½â¾öÏà¹ØÎÊÌâÔì³ÉÁËÀ§ÄÑ¡£ÀýÈç,¶ÔÒò¼²²¡µ¼Ö»éÒöÎÞЧµÄ¹æ¶¨²»Ã÷È·;¶ÔÎÞЧ»éÒöµÄÈ϶¨È±·¦ÐÐÕþ¾È¼Ã;¾¶;¶Ôµ±ÊÂÈËÌá³öµÄ»éÒöÈ·ÈÏÖ®ËßʵÐÐÒ»ÉóÖÕÉó,²»ÀûÓÚ±£»¤ÆäºÏ·¨È¨Òæ;Êܺ¦Ò»·½ÔÚ»éÒö±»È·ÈÏÎÞЧºóµÃ²»µ½ÏàÓ¦µÄÃñÊÂÅâ³¥µÈ¡£±ÊÕßÈÏΪӦ¸Ã¶ÔÎÞЧ»éÒöÁ¢·¨½øÐÐÐÞ¸ÄÍêÉÆ:ÔÚʵÌå·¨ÂÉÉÏÃ÷È·¡¢Ï¸»¯²»Ò˽á»éµÄ¼²²¡ÖÖÀ༰²»Í¬¼²²¡½ûÖ¹½á»éµÄÌõ¼þ,ÔÚÈ϶¨³ÌÐòÉÏÊÊÓöþÉóÖÕÉóÖÆ,ÔÚÐÐÕþ¾È¼ÃÉϸ³Óè»éÒöµÇ¼Ç»ú¹ØÈ϶¨ÎÞЧ»éÒöµÄȨÁ¦,ÔÚÃñÊÂÅâ³¥ÉϽ¨Á¢ÎÞЧ»éÒöÊܺ¦Ò»·½Ëðº¦Åâ³¥ÖÆ¶È¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Although China marriage law has regulations on invalid marriage, there still exist some defects which raise difficulties for judicial practice in resolving related issues. For example, it is not clear to the provisions of nullity of marriage due to illness. It lacks administrative channel for relief on identification of invalid marriage. First instance is the final instance for marriage identification which goes against in protecting legitimate rights and interests. The injured party may not get civil compensation when his or her marriage is confirmed as invalid. The writer suggest to revise and improve the legislation on invalid marriage, such as clarification on substantive law, refinement of the illness which should not get married, refinement of different disease conditions against marriage, application of second instance as the final instance on clarification procedures, empowerment of marriage registration office to identify the invalid marriage, establishment of compensation system for injured party on invalid marriage.
     
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÎÞЧ»éÒö£» Á¢·¨È±ÏÝ£» ÍêÉÆ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ invalid marriage defect on legislation improve£»
     
    27 ¡¢µÚÈýÈ˹ý´í²»Ó¦×÷Ϊ»·¾³ÎÛȾÃñÊÂÔðÈεĿ¹±çÊÂÓÉ  Åí±¾Àû£¨ÖÐɽ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ±¾ÎÄ·ÖÎöÁ˵ÚÈýÈ˹ý´íÊǹý´íÔðÈÎÇÖȨ°¸¼þµÄ¿¹±çÊÂÓÉ,È«ÃæÊáÀíÁ˵ÚÈýÈ˹ý´íÔÚÎÒ¹ú»·¾³Á¢·¨ÖеĵØÎ»Ñݱä,²¢¾ÍµÚÈýÈ˹ý´íÊÇ·ñΪ»·¾³ÎÛȾÃñÊÂÔðÈο¹±çÊÂÓɵÄÀíÂÛÕùÒé½øÐÐÁËÉîÈëµÄÊöÆÀ¡£Ìá³öÔÚÒÔºóÐ޸ġ¶º£Ñó»·¾³±£»¤·¨¡·¼°¡¶Ë®ÎÛȾ·ÀÖη¨¡·,ÉõÖÁÖÆ¶¨×¨ÃŵĻ·¾³ÇÖȨÔðÈη¨Ê±,³ýÁËÃ÷È·¹æ¶¨ÔÚËùÓл·¾³ÎÛȾÁìÓòµÚÈýÈ˹ý´í¶¼²»ÊÇ¿¹±çÊÂÓÉÍâ,»¹ÐèºÏÀíµØÉèÖõÚÈýÈ˹ý´íÎÛȾ»·¾³ÃñÊÂÔðÈεÄ×·¾¿»úÖÆºÍÉç»á»¯¾È¼Ã»úÖÆ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ That this article first analyzes the fault of a third person is the defenses of the tort cases of fault liability. Then it comprehensively reviews the evolution of the fault of a third person¡¯s position in China¡¯s environmental legislation, and for theoretical arguments about whether the fault of a third party is the defenses in civil liability for environmental pollution. It proposed that in any subsequent revision of China "marine environmental protection law" and "water pollution control act," and even the development of specialized environmental tort liability act, we should clearly define the fault of a third person, which are not the defenses in all areas of environmental pollution, while we also need to set up the mechanism of investigating the civil liability for fault of a third party leading to the environmental pollution and set up a social relief mechanism.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ µÚÈýÈ˹ý´í£» »·¾³ÎÛȾ£» ÃñÊÂÔðÈΣ» ¿¹±çÊÂÓÉ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ fault of the third part environmental pollution civil liability defenses£»
     
     
    28 ¡¢·Ç³£¹æÍ»·¢Ê¼þÓ¦¼±×¼±¸µÄ·¨Âɱ£ÕÏ  ÁÖ»ª£¨ÖйúÕþ·¨´óѧ£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÓÉÓڷdz£¹æÍ»·¢Ê¼þ¾ßÓз¢ÉúǰÕײ»³ä·Ö¡¢Ñݱ䷢չÎÞ¹æÂɵÈÌØÕ÷,ÊÂǰӦ¼±×¼±¸Í¹ÏÔÆäÖØÒªÐÔ¡£ÎÄÕ·ÖÎöÁËÎÒ¹ú·Ç³£¹æÍ»·¢Ê¼þÓ¦¼±×¼±¸Ëù´æÔÚµÄÎÊÌâ,²¢Õë¶ÔÕâЩÎÊÌâ,´Ó½¨Á¢Ïà¹ØÓ¦¼±×¼±¸ÖƶÈ¡¢½¡È«ºÍÍêÉÆÒÑÓÐÓ¦¼±Ô¤·ÀÖÆ¶È¡¢½¨Á¢½¡È«Ïà¹ØÓ¦¼±Ô¤·ÀÖÆ¶ÈµÄ¾ßÌåÂäʵºÍÖ´ÐдëÊ©µÈ½Ç¶ÈÌá³ö·¢Õ¹ºÍÍêÉÆ·Ç³£¹æÍ»·¢Ê¼þÓ¦¼±×¼±¸·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈµÄ³õ²½½¨Òé¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The emergency happens with unobvious portent and develops with abnormal regulation, so the preparedness of emergency is extremely important. The article starts from the importance of the preparedness of emergency, analyzes the reason why people ignore the preparedness of emergency, then analyses present problems of the preparedness of emergency in China, finally puts forward some suggestions of developing the legal system of the preparedness of emergency from the view of establishing the relevant systems, developing the present systems and establishing the concrete implemental measures of the preparedness of emergency.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ·Ç³£¹æÍ»·¢Ê¼þ£» Ó¦¼±×¼±¸£» ·¨Âɱ£ÕÏ£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ emergency preparedness legal guarantee£»
     
    29 ¡¢ÂÛÐÌÊÂÕì²é½×¶ÎÕì²éȨÓë±ç»¤È¨µÄ¶¯Ì¬Æ½ºâ  ÖÜÓÀʤ£¨ÖйúÕþ·¨´óѧÐÌÊÂ˾·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;   
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖ°ÄܶÔÓÚÐÌÊÂËßËϸ÷¸ö½×¶Î¿Ø¡¢±ç¡¢ÉóÈý·½È¨Á¦(Àû)µÄÅäÖÃÓÐÀíÂÛºÍʵ¼ùÉϵÄÖ¸µ¼×÷Óᣱ¾ÎÄ´ÓÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖ°Äܳö·¢,ÔÚ̽Ìֱ绤ÀíÂÛ»ù´¡ºÍÖ°Äܱ¾ÖʵĻù´¡ÉÏ,ÒÔÂÉʦ»á¼ûȨµÄ±£ÕÏÓëºÏÀíÏÞÖÆÎªÊÓ½Ç,̽ÌÖÕì²é½×¶Î±ç»¤È¨ÓëÕì²éȨµÄ»¥¶¯¹ØÏµ¡£ÓÉÓÚÕì²é³ÌÐòµÄÌØÊâÐÔ,Ôڱ绤ȨÓëÕì²éȨ¹ØÏµµÄÎÊÌâÉÏ,ÒªÇóÎÒÃDz»ÄÜ"ƽ¾ùÓÃÁ¦",Ò²²»ÄÜ"ºñ´Ë±¡±Ë",¶øÓ¦ÊµÏֱ绤ȨÓëÕì²éȨµÄ¶¯Ì¬Æ½ºâ¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ Function of the criminal procedure is configured with the theoretical and practical guidance to the rights of three parties for the prosecution, defense and trial on the criminal procedure phases. This article explores the interaction of the power of investigation and the right of defense on the investigation stage on the perspective of protection and rational limitation of the right to a lawyer and analyzing the theoretical foundation and essence of defense. Due to the particularity of investigation procedure, we should achieve dynamic balance, more than "mean forced", nor "favor one more than another" with regard to the relationship of power of investigation and right of defense.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÌʱ绤ÂÉʦ£» ±ç»¤Ö°ÄÜ£» Õì²éȨ£» ±ç»¤È¨£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ criminal defense lawyer power of investigation right of defense£»
     
    30 ¡¢¹ú¼ÊÈËȨ·¨¼°µÞÔ¼¹ú¹úÄÚ·¨¶ÔÍâ¹úÈ˲ƲúȨµÄ±£Õϼ°¶ÔÎÒ¹úÖ®Æôʾ  ÂåÑÒ£¨ÖйúÉç»á¿ÆÑ§Ôº£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ͨ¹ý¶ÔÁªºÏ¹ú¿ò¼ÜϵÄÈËȨÌõÔ¼¡¢¸÷ÇøÓòÈËȨÌõÔ¼ÒÔ¼°Ö÷ÒªµÞÔ¼¹úÔÚÍâ¹úÈ˲ƲúȨ±£ÕÏ·½ÃæµÄ¹æ¶¨ºÍ×ö·¨½øÐÐÑо¿,¿ÉÖªÁªºÏ¹úÈËȨÌõÔ¼¶ÔÒ»°ãÒâÒåÉϸöÈË(°üÀ¨Íâ¹úÈË)²Æ²úȨµÄ±£»¤³Ì¶ÈÃ÷ÏÔÆ«Èõ,¸÷ÇøÓòÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¶Ô²Æ²úȨµÄ±£»¤Ôò¸÷ÓвàÖØ,¸÷µÞÔ¼¹ú¶ÔÍâ¹úÈ˵IJƲúÆÕ±éÓÐÒ»¶¨ÏÞÖÆ¡£ÆäÖÐÓв»ÉÙÊÇÎÒ¹úÔÚÍâ¹úÈ˲ƲúȨ·½ÃæÖƶ¨ºÍÊÊÓ÷¨ÂÉ¡¢¹æÔò¿É½è¼øµÄ×ö·¨¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ This article draws the conclusions that the international human rights treaties under UN structure do not totally prohibit treating persons differently according to differentiated nationalities, and the protection of individual (including the aliens¡¯) property rights in general terms by the international human rights treaties under UN structure is very weak, while the regional human rights treaties pay attentions on different aspects of the protection of the property rights, and nearly every country has some kind of limitation on the property rights of aliens, as well as bring forward the modus operandi drawn from such conclusions which we can learn from for the establishment of laws and regulations for the property rights of aliens by China. Through systematic analysis of provisions of international human rights law under UN structure, regional human rights treaties concern the property rights, as well as modus operandi of the protection of the property rights by main contracting states.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Íâ¹úÈËȨÀû£» ²Æ²úȨ±£ÕÏ£» ¹ú¼ÊÈËȨ·¨£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ aliens¡¯ rights protection of property rights international human rights law£»
     
     
    31 ¡¢ÈçºÎ´òÔìÓÅÐãµÄ·¨Ñ§½ÌÓý  ½ÜÂÞÄ·¡¤¸¥À¼¿Ë£¨Å¦Ô¼·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;Íõ³¿¹â£¨Ç廪´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©; 
    ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÀÊ´÷¶û·¨Ñ§½ÌÓýÀíÂۺͽÌѧ·¨ÊÇÃÀ¹ú·¨Ñ§ÔºÕ¼Ö÷µ¼µØÎ»µÄ½ÌÓýģʽ,±¸ÊÜÍÆ³ç¡£È»¶øÔÚÀíÂÛÉÏ,Ëü¾ßÓÐÃ÷ÏÔµÄȱÏÝ;ÔÚʵ¼ùÖÐ,ÔòÔì³ÉÁËѧÉúÓë·¨ÂÉʵ¼ùÏàÍѽڵĺó¹û¡£ËüÈÏΪ·¨ÂÉѧ¿ÆµÄÈ«²¿×ÊÁ϶¼´¢´æÔÚ³ö°æÎïÖ®ÖС£·â±ÕÐÔ¡¢¸´¹ÅÐÔ¡¢¿¼¾ÝÐÔ³ÉΪ¹¹½¨ÀÊ´÷¶û·½·¨µÄ»ùʯ,ÐγÉÁËÒ»¸ö½¨Á¢ÔÚÊé±¾×ÊÁÏÉϵÄα¿ÆÑ§Ìåϵ¡£·¨Ñ§ÔºÓ¦µ±ÍêÈ«ÅׯúÀÊ´÷¶û½Ìѧ·¨,Ö±½ÓÃæ¶ÔÉç»áÎÊÌâ,ÔÚ¸ü¸ß²ã´ÎÉϻعéÑ§Í½ÖÆ¶È,ÒÔÂÉʦÊÂÎñËùģʽΪ·¨Ñ§½ÌÓýµÄºËÐÄ,ÒÔÖ´ÒµÕßΪ½Ìʦ,ÒÔÏÖʵÉç»áÖеķ¨ÂÉÎÊÌâΪ½ÌѧÄÚÈÝ,¿Ì²»ÈÝ»ºµØÍÆÐз¨Ñ§½ÌÓýʵÑé¡£
    ¡¾Abstract¡¿ The Lang dell Educational Theory and the Method of Teaching Law has been the most admired and long dominant model of legal education in American law schools. Nevertheless, in theory, it has apparent flaws and, in practice, creates bad consequence of separating students from legal reality. It regards legal science contained in printed books. Seclusion, nostalgia and bookishness form the foundation of the Lang dell Pedagogy and constitute a pseudo-scientific system based solely upon book-materials. Law schools must abandon the Lang dell Pedagogy, face directly social problems, revert to the apprentice system of law teaching on a more sophisticated level, make law office as the center of law schools, employ practitioners as law teachers, use real legal issues in society as teaching materials and promote educational experiment.
     
    ¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ·¨Ñ§½ÌÓý£» ÀÊ´÷¶û½Ìѧ·¨£» ·¨ÂÉ¿ÆÑ§£» ·¨ÂÉʵ¼ù£» °¸ÀýÌåϵ£» Ðж¯Öеķ¨ÂÉ£» ѧͽʽ½Ìѧ·¨£»
    ¡¾Key words¡¿ legal education Langdell pedagogy legal science legal practice case system law in action apprentice system of learning£»
     
     

    ÈÕÆÚ£º2012-7-24 14:52:35 | ¹Ø±Õ |  ·ÖÏíµ½£º

    ¸ü¶à

    Å·ÃÀ¾«Æ·Ò»Çø¶þÇøÃÛÍÎÑÇÖÞ <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Ö©Öë´Ê>| <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´> <Îı¾Á´>