µ±Ç°Î»Ö㺷¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý>>·¨Öζ¯Ì¬>>ÆÚ¿¯Ä¿Â¼>>¡¶·¨Ñ§ÂÛ̳¡·2012ÄêµÚÒ»ÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª
¡¶·¨Ñ§ÂÛ̳¡·2012ÄêµÚÒ»ÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª
http://www.cnhottime.cn¡¡ 2012-7-24 14:51:48¡¡ À´Ô´£ºÖйú·¨Ñ§»áÍø
1 ¡¢·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µÄ¼¸¸öÀíÂÛÎÊÌâ Áõ×÷Ï裨ÖйúÉç»á¿ÆÑ§Ôº·¨Ñ§Ñо¿Ëù£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ µ³µÄÊ®Æß½ìÁùÖÐÈ«»áÇ¿µ÷ÎÄ»¯½¨Éè,½«Íƽø·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯¡¢·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µÄÑо¿¡£·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯ÊÇÖ¸°üº¬ÃñÖ÷¡¢ÈËȨ¡¢Æ½µÈ¡¢×ÔÓÉ¡¢ÕýÒå¡¢¹«Æ½µÈ¼ÛÖµÔÚÄÚµÄÈËÀàÓÅÐã·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯ÀàÐÍ;·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯Óɱí²ã½á¹¹ºÍÉî²ã½á¹¹×é³É,ǰÕß°üÀ¨·¨Âɹ淶¡¢·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶È¡¢·¨ÂÉ×éÖ¯»ú¹¹¡¢·¨ÂÉÉèÊ©µÈ,ºóÕß°üÀ¨·¨ÂÉÐÄÀí¡¢·¨ÂÉÒâʶ¡¢·¨ÂÉ˼ÏëÌåϵ¡£·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯¾ÍÊÇ·¨ÂɵÄÒâʶÐÎ̬ºÍÓëÆäÏàÊÊÓ¦µÄÉç»áÖÆ¶ÈºÍ×éÖ¯»ú¹¹¡£Ò»°ãÀ´Ëµ,¹ÛÄîÖ§ÅäÐÐΪ,˼Ïë¾ö¶¨Ðж¯,¶øÁ¼ºÃµÄÖÆ¶ÈºÍ¹æ·¶ÓÖÓ°ÏìºÍËÜÔì×ÅÈËÃǵÄ˼Ïë¹ÛÄîÌåϵ¡£·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯½¨Éè¾ÍÊÇÖÆ¶ÈÐÔÎÄ»¯½¨ÉèÓë¹ÛÄîÐÔÎÄ»¯½¨ÉèµÄ½áºÏºÍ»¥¶¯¡£·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯½¨Éè¼ÈÓ¦¸Ã¸ß¶ÈÖØÊÓ·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈµÄ½¨Éè,Ò²Òª¸ß¶ÈÖØÊÓ¶Ô¹«Ãñ¹ÛÄîµÄËÜÔìºÍÌá¸ß¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The sixth plenary session of 17 th of CPC emphasis cultural construction, it will promote the researches on legal culture and law culture.Legal culture and law culture is difference, law culture is human excellent law culture type that contains many values such as democracy, human rights, equality,freedom,justice etc.. Law culture is formed by surface structure and deep structure, the former includes legal standard,legal system, legal organization, and law facilities etc. The later includes legal psychological,legal consciousness,legal thought system.Law culture is ideology and its social system and organization.Generally,the idea controls behavior, the thought decided action, good system and regulate influence and shape people¡¯s thought system. Law culture construction is combination and interaction of institutional of culture construction and conception of culture construction. Law culture construction should pay high attention to the construction of legal system, also should attach great importance to shape and improve citizen ideas.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÎʽ·¨ÖΣ» ʵÖÊ·¨ÖΣ» ·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯£» ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯£» ÎÄ»¯½á¹¹£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ formal rule by law£» substantial rule by law£» legal culture,£» law culture£» cultural structure£»
2 ¡¢Éç»áÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄî:Öйú°ÙÄê·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µÄµÚÈý²¨ Ó÷ÖУ¨ËÄ´¨´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µ±ÓÚ°ÙÄêǰºóÂÛÉý½µ¡£´ÓÐÁº¥¸ïÃüǰºó¿ªÊ¼ÐËÆðµÄ°ÙÄêÖйúµÄ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯´ó³±,ÒÀ´ÎÓ¿ÏÖ³öÁËÈý¹É´ËÆð±Ë·üµÄ²¨À½¡£·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µÄµÚÒ»²¨,ÊÇ20ÊÀ¼Í³õÆÚ¿ªÊ¼µÄ¹ú¼ÒÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄî,ÆäºËÐļÛÖµÊǹú¼Ò¸»Ç¿¡£µÚ¶þ²¨ÊÇ20ÊÀ¼Í80Äê´ú¿ªÊ¼µÄ×ÔÓÉÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄî,ÆäºËÐļÛÖµÊǸöÈË×ÔÓÉ¡£2006ÄêÕýʽÌá³öµÄÉç»áÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄî,×÷Ϊ³¬Ô½ÓÚ¹ú¼ÒÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄîÓë×ÔÓÉÖ÷Òå·¨ÖÎÀíÄîµÄ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯ÐÎ̬,´ú±íÁËÖйú°ÙÄê·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯µÄµÚÈý²¨,ÆäºËÐļÛÖµÊǹ«Æ½ÕýÒåÓëÉç»áºÍг¡£°ÙÄêÖйúÏȺóÐËÆðµÄÈý²¨·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯´ó³±,ÆäÑݽø¹æÂÉ,Ç¡ºÃÌåÏÖÁ˰ÙÄêÖйúµÄ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯´Ó"ÕýÌâ"µ½"·´Ìâ"ÔÙµ½"ºÏÌâ"µÄ±çÖ¤·¨¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Legal culture should be studied around one hundred years. After the 1911,three waves of tide of legal culture break out. The first wave of legal culture is the legal idea of nationalism that emerged in the beginning of 20th century and its core value is a country rich and strong. The second wave is the legal idea of liberalism that emerged in the 1980 and its core value is liberty. The third wave is the socialism legal idea emerged in 2006 and its core value is fairness and justice and social harmony. The evolution rule of three waves of legal culture embodies the dialectics.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ·¨ÖÎÎÄ»¯¡¢¹ú¼ÒÖ÷Òå·¨ÖΣ» ×ÔÓÉÖ÷Òå·¨ÖΣ» Éç»áÖ÷Òå·¨ÖΣ» µÚÈý²¨£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ legal culture£» legal idea of nationalism£» legal idea of liberalism£» socialism legal idea£» the third wave£»
3 ¡¢ÂÛÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûµÄÏÜ·¨±£»¤ Ī¼Íºê£¨ÖйúÉç»á¿ÆÑ§Ôº·¨Ñ§Ñо¿Ëù£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¹«ÃñµÄÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûÓ빫ÃñËùÏíÓеÄÕþÖΡ¢¾¼ÃºÍÉç»áȨÀûÒ»Ñù,¶¼Êǹ«Ãñ×÷Ϊ¹ú¼ÒºÍÉç»áÖ÷ÈËÎÌËù±ØÐëÏíÓеķ¨ÂÉÀûÒæ¡£ÎÒ¹úÊÇÉç»áÖ÷Òå¹ú¼Ò,±£»¤¹«ÃñȨÀûÊÇÉç»áÖ÷ÒåÊÂÒµÒ»¹áµÄ×ÚÖ¼¡£´ÓÏÜ·¨½Ç¶ÈÀ´±£ÕϹ«ÃñµÄÎÄ»¯È¨Àû,×îÖ÷ÒªµÄÊÇÓ¦µ±¼ÓÇ¿Ïà¹ØµÄÖÆ¶È½¨Éè¡£Ó¦µ±ÔÚÏÜ·¨Îı¾ÖÐÃ÷È·ÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûµÄ»ù±¾È¨ÀûÏÜ·¨µØÎ»,Ã÷È·¹ú¼ÒºÍÕþ¸®ÔÚ±£ÕÏÎÄ»¯È¨Àû·½ÃæÓ¦µ±³Ðµ£µÄÖ°Ôð»òÒåÎñ,¼ÓÇ¿¶ÔÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûµÄƽµÈÐԵı£»¤ÒÔ¼°Ó¦µ±Öƶ¨ÎÄ»¯»ù±¾·¨ÂÉ,À´±£ÕÏÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûµÄʵÏÖÕæÕý×öµ½Óз¨¿ÉÒÀ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The culture rights of citizens are legal interest must be enjoyed by citizens who are as the master of country and society, as well as political, economic and social rights are enjoyed by citizens. China is a socialist country,protecting of citizens¡¯ rights is a consistent aim of socialist cause.From the angle of constitution,guaranting citizens culture rights, should strengthen the system construction related. In the constitutional text, should make clear basic constitutional status for cultural rights, clear the duty and obligation by state and the government in the protection of cultural rights, strengthen the protection of equality of cultural rights and should formulate the basic legal culture, to ensure the realization of the cultural rights.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÎÄ»¯È¨Àû£» ÏÜ·¨±£»¤£» ¾¼Ã£» Éç»áºÍÎÄ»¯È¨Àû¹ú¼Ê¹«Ô¼£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ cultural rights protection constitution£» economic£» social£» and cultural rights international convention£»
4 ¡¢ÎÄ»¯·¨µÄ¶¨Î»¡¢ÔÔòÓëÌåϵ Ф½ðÃ÷£¨É½¶«´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÄ»¯·¨ÊôÓÚÉç»á·¨µÄ·¶³ë,Ö¼ÔÚ±£ÕϹ«ÃñÎÄ»¯È¨ÒæµÄʵÏÖºÍÂú×ãÈËÃñȺÖÚ¾«ÉñÉú»îÐèÒª¡£½¨Á¢¹«ÃñÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûÓëÕþ¸®ÔðÈÎÖ®¼äµÄ¹ØÁªÐÔ,È·Á¢ºÍά»¤²úÒµÎÄ»¯ÓëÊÂÒµÎÄ»¯ÐÎ̬,´Ù½øÎÄ»¯ÌåÖÆ¸Ä¸ï¡¢Éç»áºËÐļÛÖµÌåϵ½¨ÉèºÍÎÄ»¯·±ÈÙ·¢Õ¹,ÐèÒª¼ÓÇ¿ÎÄ»¯·¨Öν¨Éè¡£ÎÄ»¯·¨Öν¨ÉèÓ¦µ±×ñÑÎÄ»¯È¨Àû±£ÕÏ¡¢Õþ¸®Ö÷µ¼Ó빫ÖÚ²ÎÓë½áºÏ¡¢Êг¡»¯ÓëÕþ¸®¹æÖÆÐµ÷ÒÔ¼°×ÛºÏÐ§ÒæÔÔò,¹¹½¨ÓÉÏÜ·¨ÎÄ»¯È¨ÀûÓëÏÜ·¨ÎÄ»¯Õþ²ßÁ½¿é¼áʵ»ùʯ¡¢ÎÄ»¯ÊÂÒµ·¨ÖÆÓëÎÄ»¯²úÒµ·¨ÖÆÁ½¸ö»ù±¾²àÃæ¡¢ÖÐÑëÎÄ»¯Á¢·¨ÓëµØ·½ÎÄ»¯Á¢·¨Á½¸ö¶ÔÓ¦²ãÃæ¡¢ÎÄ»¯Õþ²ßÓëÎÄ»¯·¨ÂÉÁ½¸ö»¥¶¯·½ÃæÓлú¹¹³ÉµÄÎÄ»¯·¨ÖÆÌåϵ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Cultural law is the scope of social law, in order to protect the cultural rights of citizens and meet the people¡¯s spiritual needs. It need to strengthen the establishment of cultural law in order to establish the correlation between of citizens cultural rights and government responsibility, establish and maintain the patterns of industrial culture, promote the reform of cultural system, the core value system of social and cultural prosperity development. The establishment of culture law should be followed the principles of protecting cultural rights, public participation in government-led integration, market-oriented and government regulation coordination, comprehensive benefits, build the cultural legal system that is be composed by two solid foundation of the constitution cultural rights and the constitution cultural policies, two the basic side of cultural undertakings and cultural industries, two corresponding levels of the central cultural legislation and local cultural legislation, two interaction aspects of cultural policy and cultural law.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÎÄ»¯·¨£» ·¨ÂÉÊôÐÔ£» Á¢·¨ÔÔò£» ·¨ÖÆÌåϵ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ culture law£» legal property£» legislative principles£» legal system£»
5 ¡¢·ÖÅäÕýÒåÓëÊÕÒæ¹«Õý·ÖÅä ÕŶ«£¨±±¾©´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÊÕÒæ¹«Õý·ÖÅäÊÇתÐÍʱÆÚÉç»á¹«ÕýµÄÖØÒªÎ¬¶È,άϵÈËȨ±£»¤¡¢¾¼Ã·¢Õ¹¡¢Éç»áÎȶ¨Óë¹ú¼ÒÖÎÀí,Ô̺×Å·ÖÅäÕýÒåÀíÂÛ¡£¶àÖÖÒòËØ¾ö¶¨¾¼Ã·¨·ÖÅäÕýÒåÊǸ´ºÏÕýÒå,Ç¿»¯ÔÚÊг¡·ÖÅä»úÖÆ»ù´¡ÉϵĹú¼ÒÔÙ·ÖÅäÖ°ÄÜ,ÒÔ´Ù½øÉç»á»ù±¾½á¹¹µÄ¹«Õý¡£¾¼Ã·¨·ÖÅäÕýÒåÀíÂÛͨ¹ýµì¶¨ÊÕÒæ·ÖÅäÖ®ÀíÂÛ»ù´¡,ÌṩÊÕÒæ·ÖÅäÖ®ÖÆ¶ÈÊôÐԵķ¾¶´Ù½øÊÕÒæ¹«Õý·ÖÅä,½ø¶øÊµÏÖÒÔÉç»á¹«ÕýΪÖÐÐĵĿɳÖÐø¾¼Ã·¢Õ¹,ÍÆ¶¯ÖйúÉç»á˳ÀûתÐÍ¡£¶øÒÔ·ÖÅäÕýÒåΪºâÁ¿³ß¶È,ÎÒ¹úÊÕÒæ·ÖÅäÖÆ¶ÈÐèÒª½øÒ»²½ÍêÉÆ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Fair distribution of gains is the important dimension of social justice in the social transformation period, which is crucial to human rights protection, economic development, social stability and government governance, and contains distributive justice theory. Many factors decide the distributive justice of economic Law is compound justice theory, which emphasizes redistribution functions of government on the basis of market distribution mechanism to promote the justice of the basic structure of society. Distributive justice theory of economic Law promotes fair distribution of gains through forming the foundation and providing legal attribute for distributive of gains, and in turn achieves sustainable development with social justice as the center, drives society transition of China smoothly. China¡¯s legal institutions of gains distribution, need further improvement by distributive justice standards.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¾¼Ã·¨£» Éç»á¹«Õý£» ·ÖÅäÕýÒ壻 ÊÕÒæ·ÖÅ䣻 ·¨ÖÎÓë·¢Õ¹£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ economic law£» social justice£» eistributive justice£» distribution of gains£» role of law and development£»
6 ¡¢ÂÛÎÒ¹úÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕÊÕÒæ·ÖÅäÖÆ¶È¸Ä¸ï Áõ¹úÕ飨»ªÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ×ÔÉÏÊÀ¼ÍÎÒ¹úʵÐÐÍÁµØÍ³Õ÷ºÍÓг¥Ê¹ÓÃÖÆ¶ÈÒÔÀ´,ÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕÊÕÒæ·ÖÅäÖÆ¶ÈµÄȱÏÝÈÕÒæÍ¹ÏÔ,±íÏÖÔÚ:Å©Ãñ¼¯ÌåºÍÅ©ÃñδÄÜ·ÖÏíÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕ¹ý³ÌÖвúÉúµÄ·¢Õ¹ÐÔÀûÒæ;ÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕ²¹³¥±ê׼̫µÍ;ÍÁµØÊÕÒæ·ÖÅ伯ÖÐÓÚÊС¢ÏØÈËÃñÕþ¸®¡£¾¿Æä³ÉÒòÔÚÓÚ:ûÓнâ¾ö¶¯Ì¬ÍÁµØÈ¨ÀûµÄÖÆ¶È°²ÅÅ;ÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕ²¹³¥»úÖÆ²»ÄÜÊÊÓ¦Êг¡¾¼ÃÐÂÌåÖÆ;"ÍÁµØ²ÆÕþ"µÄÀûÒæÇý¶¯¡£ÆÆ³ýÉÏÊöȱÏݵĸĸï˼·Ϊ:½¨Á¢ÍÁµØ·¢Õ¹È¨ÖƶÈ;×ñÑÊг¡¹æÔò,¸Ä¸ïÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕ²¹³¥·½Ê½;Ôö¼ÓÖÐÑëÍÁµØÊÕÒæ·ÖÅä±ÈÀý,Àí˳ÍÁµØÊÕÒæ·ÖÅä¹ØÏµ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Since last century, the deficiencies of land expropriation profit distribution have become increasingly prominent with the system of land unified expropriation and paid use. They show as follows: Firstly, collective farmers and peasantries are unable to share the developed interests in the course of land expropriation.Secondly,it¡¯s too low for the land expropriation compensation.Thirdly,land profit distribution focuses on the city and district governments. There are some reasons. First of all, it doesn¡¯t solve the problem of dynamic land rights system.Second,the land expropriation compensation mechanism can¡¯t adapt to market economic system. At last, it is driven by "land finance¡±. In order to get rid of the defects of the reform, it¡¯s essential to establish the land developed rights system, follow the market rules and reform the land expropriation compensation. What¡¯s more, it¡¯s helpful to increase the proportion of central distribution of land revenue and rationalize the relationship of land profit distribution.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÍÁµØÕ÷ÊÕ£» ÊÕÒæ·ÖÅ䣻 ÍÁµØ²¹³¥£» ²úÖµ±¶Êý·¨£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ Land expropriation£» Profit distribution£» Land compensation£» Method of valued multiples£»
7 ¡¢ÎÒ¹ú¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾ÊÕÒæÈô¸É·¨ÂÉÎÊÌâÑо¿ »ª¹úÇ죨°²»Õ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÒ¹úÓÚ1994Ä꿪ʼ½øÐйúÓÐ×ʱ¾ÊÕÒæÖÆ¶È¸Ä¸ï²¢È¡µÃÁËһЩ³ÉЧ,µ«´Óʵ¼ùÀ´¿´,ÈÔÈ»´æÔÚÊÕÒæ·ÖÅ䷶Χ¹ýÕ¡¢ÊÕ½ÉÖ÷Ìå²»Ã÷¡¢±ÈÀý¹ýµÍµÈÖî¶àÎÊÌâ,ؽÐè½øÐÐÏàÓ¦µÄÐÞ¸ÄÍêÉÆ,ʹ¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾ÊÕÒæÖÆ¶ÈÔÚ±£ÕϹú¼Ò×÷Ϊ¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾Í¶×ÊÕßÓ¦µ±ÏíÓеÄÈ¨Òæ¡¢ÊµÏÖ¹úÃñÊÕÈ빫ƽ·ÖÅä·½ÃæµÄ×÷ÓÃÕæÕýµÃµ½·¢»Ó¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ China has begun reforming the System of State-owned capital gains since 1994 and achieves some success. From the practice,however,there are still many other issues, such as the income distribution is too narrow, the main body of collection is unknown and the ratio of collection is too low.Hence,it needs to be modified and improved accordingly to play the real role of the System of State-owned capital gains as protecting national interests of the state-capital investors and achieving its function of equitable distribution of national income.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾£» ¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾ÊÕÒæ£» ¹úÓÐ×ʱ¾¾ÓªÔ¤Ë㣻
¡¾Key words¡¿ State-owned capital£» State-owned capital gains£» state-owned capital management budget£»
8 ¡¢¹ÊÒâÉ˺¦×ïÐÂÂÛ Ö£ÔóÉÆ£¨ÄÏ¿ª´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÓÉÓÚÎÒ¹úÐÌ·¨Ö»¹æ¶¨Ò»¸öÉ˺¦¹ÊÒâ,Òò´Ë,µ±ÐÐΪÈ˳öÓÚÇáÉ˵ĹÊÒâµ¼ÖÂËûÈËÖØÉ˽á¹û,Ó¦µ±ÔõÑù´¦·£,²»½öÔÚÐÌ·¨ÀíÂÛÖÐûÓÐÒ»¸öͳһµÄ»ù×¼,ÔÚ˾·¨Êµ¼ùÖÐÒ²ÊǼûÈʼûÖÇ¡£ÊµÊ©±©Á¦ÐÐΪ,µ¼Ö±»º¦ÈËÖØÉË»òËÀÍöµÄ,Ó¦µ±ÊôÓÚ¹ÊÒâÉ˺¦×ïµÄ½á¹û¼ÓÖØÐÎ̬¡£ÔÚ¹ÊÒâÉ˺¦µÄÇé¿öÏÂ,¼´±ãÓб»º¦ÕߵijÐŵ,ÓÉÓÚ×÷ΪÉ˺¦µÄÉç»áÒâÒ岢ûÓбä¸ü,Òò´Ë,²»ÄÜ×èÈ´¹¹³ÉÒª¼þµÄ·ûºÏÐÔ¡£µ«ÊÇ,»ùÓÚ±»º¦Õß³ÐŵµÄÎ¥·¨ÐÔµÄ×èÈ´,ÔÚijÖÖÇé¿öÏ¿ÉÒÔ³ÉÁ¢¡£×èÈ´Î¥·¨ÐÔµÄÅжÏ,Ó¦µ±¸ù¾Ý±»º¦Õß´¦·Ö×Ô¼ºÉíÌåµÄ°²È«ÕâÒ»·¨Òæ,ÊÇ·ñ¾ßÓÐÉç»áÏ൱ÐÔ¶ø½øÐС£Õë¶ÔͬʱÉ˺¦µÄÇé¿ö,²»Ó¦È϶¨Îª¹²Í¬É˺¦¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ There is only one intentional damage stipulated in our criminal law.Therefore,as for the problem of how to punish a person when he causes serious injury but only on purpose of slight injury, there are no unified standards in criminal theory, and opinions differing judicial practice. Implementing violence leading to the victim serious injury of death should belong to the aggravated form of the crime of intentional injury. In the case of intentional damage, even if there are consents of victim it cannot resistant the conformance of constitutive requirements, because the social significance of damage has no change. But in some situations, the consent of victim can be ground for elimination of illegality. The judgment of eliminating illegitimacy should be conducted on whether the legal interest that the victim sanctions his body safety has social correspondence. Injury at the same time should not be deemed as common injury.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ½á¹û¼ÓÖØ£» ±»º¦ÕߵijÐŵ£» Î¥·¨ÐÔ±¾ÖÊ£» ͬʱÉ˺¦£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ aggravated consequential offence£» consent of victim£» he essence of illegality£» injury at the same time£»
9 ¡¢ÂÛÔ¤¸æµÇ¼Ç֮ծȨÔÚÆÆ²ú³ÌÐòÖеķ¨ÂɵØÎ»ºÍ±£ÕÏ Îⴺ᪣¨ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧ¹«¹²¹ÜÀíѧԺ£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ô¤¸æµÇ¼Ç֮ծȨÓëÎÒ¹ú´«Í³ÆÆ²ú·¨Öеĸ÷ÏîȨÀûÓб¾Öʲ»Í¬,Æä¾ßÓÐÏà¶Ô¶ÀÁ¢µÄ·¨ÂɵØÎ»¡£Ô¤¸æµÇ¼Ç֮ծȨÔÚÆÆ²ú³ÌÐòÖеı£ÕϺÍʵÏÖ¾ßÓÐÌØÊâµÄ¹æÔò:ÔÚÆÆ²úÉêÇëÊÜÀí½×¶Î,Ô¤¸æµÇ¼ÇÅųý¸ö±ðÇå³¥ÎÞЧÔÔò¡¢¹ÜÀíÈËÑ¡ÔñȨµÄÊÊÓÃ;ÔÚÆÆ²úÖØÕû³ÌÐòÖÐ,Ô¤¸æµÇ¼ÇºóծȨÊÜÓªÒµ±£»¤µÄÏÞÖÆ,¶ÔծȨµÄ·ÖÀà¶øÑÔ,Ô¤¸æµÇ¼ÇºóµÄծȨӦµ±µ¥ÁÐ,Ëü¾ßÓÐÌØ¶¨µÄծȨµ÷Õû·½·¨;ÔÚÆÆ²úºÍ½â½×¶Î,Ô¤¸æµÇ¼Ç¾ßÓжԿ¹µÇ¼ÇÒåÎñÈËÖ®ÆÆ²úºÍ½âÐÒéµÄЧÁ¦;ÔÚÆÆ²úÇåËã½×¶Î,Ô¤¸æµÇ¼ÇºóµÄծȨÓëÒ»°ãծȨºÍ±ð³ýȨµÄ˳λ¹ØÏµÓ¦¸ù¾Ýʵ¼ÊÇé¿ö¾ßÌå·ÖÎö¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The status of the creditor¡¯s right that has been lodged the registration of caution is relatively independent, which is essentially different from other legal rights in bankruptcy law. The safeguard of the creditor¡¯s rights that has been lodged the registration of caution, as well as the settlement of such debt, in bankruptcy procedure should follow the specific principles, such as the principle that repaying debt separately is invalid and manager option were both excluded from registration of caution at the time the bankruptcy petition has been accepted; during bankruptcy restructuring process, the creditor¡¯s rights is restricted by business protection after the registration of caution has been lodged, as to the classification of creditor¡¯s rights, creditor¡¯s right that has been lodged the registration of caution should be listed separately, because a specific debt adjusting method is applied to it; at the stage of bankruptcy settlement, registration of caution may be a valid defense against registering party; at the bankruptcy liquidation stage, the sequence of the creditor¡¯s right that has been lodged the registration of caution, general creditor¡¯s right and the exemption right should be formed according to the actual situation.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Ô¤¸æµÇ¼Ç£» ÆÆ²ú³ÌÐò£» ·¨ÂɵØÎ»£» ծȨ±£ÕÏ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ registration of caution£» bankruptcy procedure£» legal status£» safeguard of the creditor¡¯s right£»
10 ¡¢ÎÒ¹úÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨Èô¸ÉÎÊÌâµÄ˼¿¼ ÁõÕþ£¨ÄϾ©Àí¹¤´óѧÈËÎÄÓëÉç»á¿ÆÑ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÔÚµ±½ñÖйúʵÐÐÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨,ÃæÁÙ×Å˾·¨Äܶ¯Óë˾·¨¿ËÖÆÁ½ÖÖ²»Í¬Ë¾·¨ÀíÄîµÄÕùÂÛ,ÕⳡÕùÂÛÖ±½Ó¹ØÏµµ½ÎÒ¹ú˾·¨ÌåÖÆ¸Ä¸ïÓë˾·¨ÖƶȽ¨ÉèµÄÀúÊ·½ø³Ì¡£ÀúÊ·ÒªÇóÎÒÃÇÔÚÖйú˾·¨Óï¾³ÏÂ,´Ó·¨Ñ§ÀíÂÛÓë·¨ÂÉʵ¼ùµÄ½áºÏÉÏ,¿Í¹Û·ÖÎöÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨µÄ±È½ÏÓÅÊÆ,¿ÆÑ§×ö³öÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨µÄģʽѡÔñ,ÉîÈëÑо¿ÊʶÈÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨µÄ¼ÛֵȡÏò¡£ÔÚ´Ë»ù´¡ÉÏ,»ý¼«Ì½Ñ°ÎÒ¹úÄܶ¯Ë¾·¨µÄºÏÀí;¾¶ºÍ¿ÆÑ§·½Ê½¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Building the active justice in modern China, have faced the concept debate between judicial activism and judicial restraint, this debate is directly related with the process of development and reform of our judicial system. Now requires us to analysis the comparative advantage of building active justice and research it¡¯s operating mode and value orientation under the China¡¯s judicial surrounding and legal theory and practice.Then,find the rational way of building China¡¯s active justice.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Äܶ¯Ë¾·¨£» ±È½ÏÓÅÊÆ£» ģʽѡÔñ£» ¼ÛֵȡÏò£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ active justice£» comparative advantage£» mode selection£» value orientation£»
11 ¡¢¶ñÒâǷн×ïÈô¸ÉÎÊÌâ̽¾¿ ½ªÌΣ¨ÄϾ©Ê¦·¶´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ °Ñ¡¶ÐÌ·¨ÐÞÕý°¸(°Ë)¡·µÚ41ÌõÐÂÔöÉèµÄ×ïÃû¶¨Î»Îª¶ñÒâǷн×ï,²»½ö¸üΪÐÎÏó¡¢Éú¶¯Óë¼ò½à,¸ü¼Ó·ûºÏ±¾×ïµÄ·¸×ï¹¹³É,¶øÇÒ»¹Äܹ»È«Ãæ·´Ó³±¾×ïµÄ±¾ÖÊÊôÐÔ¡£¶ñÒâǷн×ïµÄÏÖÓÐÁ¢·¨¹æ¶¨ÉÐÓв»Ã÷È·Ö®´¦»ò¸ù±¾ÐÔȱÏÝ,Ó¦ÓèÒÔ½âÊÍ»ò¸Ä½ø¡£ÆäÖÐ,Ó¦°Ñ±¾×ïµÄÖ÷¹Û·½Ãæ½âÊÍΪ"¶ñÒâ",°Ñ±¾×ïµÄ¿Í¹Û·½ÃæÏÞ¶¨Îª"Çé½Ú·¸",ÒÔºÏÀí»®¶¨±¾×ïµÄ·¸×ïȦ¡£Í¬Ê±,»¹Ó¦ÉáÆú¿Í¹ÛµÄ´¦·£Ìõ¼þ,¶ø²ÉÓÃÒ»ÖÖ¶þÔª»¯·¸×ïģʽ,ÒÔÓÐЧ¶ôÖÆ¶ñÒâǷнÐÐΪ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The crime new added by article 41 of Amendment of Criminal Law(8) should be named the Crime of malicious wage, which is not only more image, vivid and concise, and in line with the crime constitution, but also able to comprehensively reflect the essential attribute of this crime. As far as current legislation of the crime of malicious wage is concerned, there are some undefined places and fundamental flaws, so it should be interpreted or improved effectively. Among them, the subjective aspect of the crime of malicious wage should be interpreted as "malicious¡±, the objective aspect of the crime of malicious wage should be limited to "circumstance crime¡±, so as to delimit its crime circle reasonably.Meanwhile,they still should abandon objective punishment condition, instead adopt dualization crime pattern,so as to contain the behavior of malicious wage effectively.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¶ñÒâǷн× Çé½Ú·¸£» ¶þÔª»¯·¸×ïģʽ£» ¡¶ÐÌ·¨ÐÞÕý°¸(°Ë)¡·£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ the crime of malicious wage£» dualization crime pattern£» amendment of criminal law(8)£»
12 ¡¢¹«ÓÃÊÂÒµÃñÓª»¯Ì½ÌÖ¡ª¡ª»ùÓÚ¹«·¨Ñ§µÄ˼¿¼ ÍõïÇ£¨±±¾©º½¿Õº½Ìì´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¹«ÓÃÊÂÒµµÄÃñÓª»¯ÒѾ³ÉΪ¹«¹²ÐÐÕþÁìÓòµÄÒ»¸öÐÂÀ˳±¡£ÔÚÎÒ¹ú,¹«ÓÃÊÂÒµµÄÃñÓª»¯¾ßÓкÏÏÜÐÔºÍÐÐÕþ·¨ÉϵÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡,µ«Í¬Ê±ÏÜ·¨µÄ¹æ¶¨ºÍÐÐÕþ·¨µÄÔÀíҲΪ¹«ÓÃÊÂÒµÃñÓª»¯É趨Á˽çÏÞ¡£ÏÖÐеĹ«ÓÃÊÂÒµÃñÓª»¯Ö÷Òª²ÉÓÃÇ©¶©ÌØÐí¾ÓªÐÒéµÄ·½Ê½À´Íê³É,ÕâÖÖÌØÐí¾ÓªÐÒéÊôÓÚÐÐÕþ·¨ÉϵÄÐÐÕþºÏͬ,¿ÉÒÔͨ¹ýÐÐÕþËßËϵķ½Ê½À´¾È¼Ã¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Privatizing of public utility has been a tide in the field of public administration. In China, privatizing of public utility has a theoretic base in constitutional law and administrative law.However,the article of constitutional law and administrative law threw a limit on privatizing of public utility. At present, privatizing of public utility comes to true mostly by a contract licensing to manage. The contract licensing to manage belongs to a kind of administrative contract, which is remedied by the administrative litigation.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¹«ÓÃÊÂÒµ£» ÃñÓª»¯£» »ù±¾¹ú²ß£» ÐÐÕþºÏͬ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ public utility£» privatizing£» the basic national policy£» administrative contract£»
13 ¡¢¹«ËßȨÓë±»º¦ÈËȨÀûÖ®³åÍ»¼°ºâƽ¡ª¡ªÒÔÉí·Ý¹ØÏµÒòËØÎªÊÓ½Ç ËÕÁÕࣨÏÃÃÅ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÐÌÊÂËßËÏ´ò»÷·¸×ïºÍ±£ÕÏÈËȨµÄË«ÖØÄ¿µÄËäÈ»³ÉΪͨ˵,µ«½â¾öÈËÀà³åÍ»¾À·×µÄ×î¸ù±¾ÈÎÎñÈ´ÈÝÒ×±»ºöÂÔ¡£ÐÌÊÂËßËÏÖÆ¶È·¢Õ¹¹ý³ÌÖÐ,±»º¦È˵ĵØÎ»ÓëȨÀû¾Àú×ÅÆð·üµÄ¹ý³Ì,¼´Ê¹Èç½ñÒÑÊܵ½ÖØÊÓ,µ«±»º¦È˵ijÌÐò²ÎÓëȨÈÔÊÇÒ»´óÄÑÌâ¡£ÒÔÇ£ÉæÉí·Ý¹ØÏµµÄÐÌʰ¸¼þ×÷Ϊ̽ÌÖ¹«ËßȨ±ß½çÎÊÌâµÄÌØ¶¨³¡Óò¾ßÓÐÖØÒªµÄʵ¼ùÒâÒå,¶ÔÓÚ¹«ËßȨ×ÔÉíµÄÍêÉÆºÍ»¯½âÉç»áì¶Ü¾ù¾ßÓлý¼«Íƶ¯×÷Óá£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Though it is accepted that the aims of criminal procedure consist of protecting rights and attacking crimes, its essential mission of conflict resolution is always neglected. There are fluctuations in the developing history of victim¡¯s status.Nowadays,it is a tickler to put the victim¡¯s right of taking part in the criminal procedure into affect. It will be full of practical significance to study the borderline problem of public prosecution¡¯s power basing on cases involving personal relationship. It will also bring motivations to public prosecution¡¯s power and resolution of social conflict.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ Éç»áì¶Ü»¯½â£» ÆðËßÌæ´ú´ëÊ©£» ¹«¹²ÀûÒæÉó²é£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ resolution of social conflict£» measures instead of prosecution£» public interest examination£»
14 ¡¢ÓÃÒæÎïȨ¿ÍÌ巶ΧµÄÈýά¿¼²ì¡ª¡ª¼æÆÀÎÒ¹ú¡¶ÎïȨ·¨¡·µÚ117Ìõ ÀÄþ£¨Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧÃñÉÌ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ±È½Ï·¨¿¼²ì±íÃ÷,ÔÚÍÁµØÎü¸½½¨ÖþÎïµÄ²»¶¯²úÀíÄîÏÂ,ÓÃÒæÎïȨÒÔÍÁµØÎªºËÐĶøÉ趨,ÒÔÔÚ½¨ÖþÎï¡¢¶¯²úºÍȨÀûÉÏÉèÁ¢ÒÛȨ¡¢ÓÃÒæÈ¨¡¢Ê¹ÓÃȨµÈÁ¢·¨¼¼Êõ´¦ÀíΪ¸¨Öú,ÐγɿÍÌ巶Χ¿í·ºµÄ²Æ²úÓÃÒæÈ¨ÀûÌåϵ¡£ÔÚÍÁµØºÍ½¨ÖþÎï¸÷Ϊ¶ÀÁ¢µÄ²»¶¯²úµÄÀíÄîÏÂ,ÓÃÒæÎïȨֻÔÚ²»¶¯²úÉÏÉ趨¡£ÓÃÒæÎïȨµÄ¿ÍÌ巶Χȡ¾öÓÚ¶ÔÓÃÒæÎïȨµÄÖÆ¶ÈģʽѡÔñÓëÁ¢·¨¼¼Êõ°²ÅÅ¡£ÎÒ¹úÓÃÒæÎïÈ¨ÖÆ¶ÈµÄÒ»°ã¹æ¶¨ºÍ¾ßÌåȨÀûÖ®¼ä¡¢¾ßÌåȨÀûºÍÎïȨ·¨¶¨ÔÔòÖ®¼ä¾ù´æÔÚÂ߼ì¶ÜºÍ·¨Àí³åÍ»¡£¹¦ÀûÐÔµÄÎÄÒå½âÊÍÑÚÊÎÂ߼ì¶Ü,¶Ô°ÑÎÕ·¨ÂÉÕæÒåÔì³ÉÎ󵼡£Á¢·¨»ú¹ØÓ¦µ±Î¬»¤²»¶¯²ú¸ÅÄîÄÚºÔÚÎïȨ·¨ÌåϵÉϵÄÒ»ÖÂÐÔ,¶ÔÓÃÒæÎïȨµÄÖÆ¶ÈÄ£Ê½ÖØÐÂ×ö³öÑ¡Ôñ,ÔÚÁ¢·¨¼¼ÊõÉ϶ÔÏÖÐз¨¹æ¶¨Ö®ÃýÎó½øÐв¹¾È¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The study of comparative law shows that under the idea of building adsorbed by land, land is taken as the core of usufructuary right.Buildings,movable properties and rights are auxiliary to usufructuary right.The scope of the objects of usufruct is broad. But under the idea of land and buildings are independent real estates respectively, usufructuary right only sets on real estate. The scope of the objects of usufructuary right depends on the usufruct system model and legislative technical arrangements. In part III of Chinese Real Right Law, logical contradiction exists between general provisions and specific rights, and legal conflict also exists between specific rights and the legal principle of real right. Utilitarian interpretation of the letters covers up the logical contradiction and leads to the misunderstanding of the true meaning of the law. The legislature should uphold the consistency concept of real estate in the Real Right Law,re-select the system mode of usufructuary right and remedy the legislative technical errors.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÓÃÒæÎïȨ¿ÍÌ壻 ²»¶¯²ú£» ÍÁµØ£» ½¨ÖþÎ ÈËÒÛȨ£» ÓÃÒæÈ¨£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ objects of usufructuary right£» real estate£» land£» building£» easement£» usufruct£»
15 ¡¢Öظ´¹©ÊöµÄÅųý¹æÔòÑо¿ лС½££¨½Î÷²Æ¾´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Èç¹ûÄܹ»Ö¤Ã÷³õ´Î¹©ÊöÉæÏÓÓ÷Ƿ¨ÊֶλñÈ¡,´ËºóÔںϷ¨µÄѶÎʳÌÐòÏÂ×÷³öÈô¸É·ÝÏàËÆµÄÔٴι©ÊöÊÇ·ñÓ¦µ±Åųý,ÊÇ·Ç·¨Ö¤¾ÝÅųý±ØÐë½â¾öµÄÎÊÌâ¡£ÅųýÖØ¸´¹©ÊöµÄ±ê×¼ÔÚÓÚ·Ç·¨ÐÐΪÓëÖØ¸´¹©ÊöµÄÁªÏµÃÜÇг̶È,Ó¦µ±ÔËÓÃ"Îå²½Åųý·¨"Ȩºâ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ If you can prove that the initial confessions obtained by illegal means,after that,the number of statements which gotten in legal interrogation procedures similar to the first confessions, whether them should be excluded, it is a problem which must be solved with Exclusionary Rule. The standard of eliminating repeated statement is the closely level of the relation between illegal acts and repeated confessions. In my opinion, it should use "five-step process of elimination" to balance and consider the main factors, such as the subject of interrogate, stage of procedure, the interval of time, the illegal level, the degree of dilution and so on.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÖØ¸´¹©Êö£» ·Ç·¨Ö¤¾Ý£» ѶÎʱʼ£» ¶¾Ê÷Ö®¹û£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ repeated statements£» illegal evidence£» interrogation record£» fruit of the poisonous tree£»
16 ¡¢ÂÛÎÒ¹úÐÌ·£ÀíÂÛÑо¿ÖеÄËĸöÎóÇø¡ª¡ªÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄÒ»ÔªÂÛÖ®Ìá³ö Íõ¸Õ£¨Î人´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÎÒ¹úÐÌ·£ÀíÂÛÑо¿ÖдæÔÚËĸöÎóÇø:»ìÏýÁËÐÌ·¨Ä¿µÄÓëÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ;¶ÔÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄµÄº¬ÒåÀí½â´íÎó;°ÑÒ»°ãÔ¤·Àµ±×÷ÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ;°Ñ±¨Ó¦µ±×÷ÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ¡£Í¨¹ý¶ÔÕâËĸöÎóÇøµÄÀåÇå,¿ÉÒԵóöÒÔϽáÂÛ:ÐÌ·¨Ä¿µÄÓëÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄÊÇÁ½¸ö²»Í¬µÄ¸ÅÄî;ÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ,ÊÇÖ¸¹ú¼Òͨ¹ýÊÊÓúÍÖ´ÐÐÐÌ·£ËùÆÚÍû´ïµ½µÄÄ¿±ê;Ò»°ãÔ¤·ÀÊÇÐÌ·¨Ä¿µÄ,²»ÊÇÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ;±¨Ó¦ÊÇÐÌ·£µÄ±¾ÖÊ,²»ÊÇÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ;ÐÌ·£µÄÄ¿µÄÊÇÌØÊâÔ¤·À¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Four misunderstandings exists in the research of punishment theory in China, they are confusing the purpose of criminal law and the purpose of punishment; misunderstanding the concept of the purpose of criminal law; treating the general prevention as the purpose of punishment and treating retribution as the purpose of punishment. Through the clarification of these four misunderstandings can we draw the following conclusions: the purpose of punishment and the purpose of criminal law are two different concepts; the purpose of punishment is the objective of the application and enforcement of punishment by States; general prevention is the purpose of criminal law and not the purpose of punishment; retribution is the essence of punishment and not the purpose of punishment; the purpose of punishment is special prevention.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÐÌ·¨Ä¿µÄ£» ÐÌ·£Ä¿µÄ£» Ò»°ãÔ¤·À£» ÌØÊâÔ¤·À£» ±¨Ó¦£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ the purpose of criminal law£» the purpose of punishment£» four misunderstandings£» general prevention£» special prevention£» retribution£»
17 ¡¢²úƷȱÏÝÔðÈÎÖ÷ÌåµÄÈ·¶¨¡ª¡ªÒÔÃÀ¹ú·¨ÎªÖ÷Òª¿¼²ì¶ÔÏó Áõºêμ£¨É½¶«´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ²úƷȱÏÝÔðÈÎÖ÷Ìå,ÊÇÖ¸µ±È±ÏݲúÆ·ÖÂÈËËðº¦Ê±,Ó¦³Ðµ£ÏàÓ¦µÄÃñÊÂÔðÈεÄÖ÷Ìå¡£ÃÀ¹ú·¨¶Ô²úÆ·ÔðÈÎÖ÷ÌåµÄ¹æ¶¨×ÅÑÛÓÚ"ÉÌÒµÐÔµÄÏúÊÛÕß",ͨ¹ý¡¶ÇÖȨ·¨ÖØÊö¡·ºÍÅÐÀý,Öð²½À©Õ¹ÁËÉÌÒµÐÔÏúÊÛÕߵķ¶Î§¡£¶ø²úƷȱÏÝÔðÈÎÖ÷ÌåÕýÊÇÒÔÓªÀûΪĿµÄ´ÓÊÂÓªÀûÐÔÐÐΪµÄÉÌÖ÷Ìå,È·ÈϲúÆ·ÔðÈÎÖ®ÔðÈÎÖ÷ÌåµÄÒÀ¾ÝÇ¡ÊÇÉÌ·¨Ð§ÒæÖÁÉÏÓëÃñ·¨×·Ç󹫯½Õâ¶þÕßÖ®¼äµÄ²©ÞÄ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The persons liable for product defect are those who should bear their respective civil liability if a defective product causes property damage or physical injury to others. According to law in American, the persons liable for product defect refer to any sellers in the business whose scope was gradually expanded by Restatement of the Tort Law and prejudication.If we view the issue from a different perspective, the persons liable for product defect are just commercial subjects who are undertaking profit-making activities? In order to seek profits,and the very foundation as which regarded product liability is the game playing between supremacy of benefit in business law and following fairness in civil law.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ²úƷȱÏÝ£» ÔðÈÎÖ÷Ì壻 ÉÌÖ÷Ì壻
¡¾Key words¡¿ product defect£» persons liable£» commercial subject£»
18 ¡¢¶ÔÍ»ÆÆºÏͬÏà¶ÔÐÔÔÔòµÄÔÙÈÏʶ¡ª¡ª¼æ¼°¶Ô¡¶µÂ¹úÃñ·¨µä¡·µÚ359ÌõÖ®½è¼ø Ðì¾²£¨ÄϾ©´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ºÏͬÊÇÏà¶ÔÈËÖ®¼äµÄ·¨ÂÉ,¶ÔË«·½µ±ÊÂÈ˾ßÓоÐÊøÁ¦¡£µ±Á½ºÏͬÔÚ¾¼ÃÉϾßÓÐÕûÌåÁªÏµÊ±,ÆäÖÐÒ»ºÏͬµ±ÊÂÈËÎ¥Ô¼,ÒýÖÂͬʱ´¦ÓÚÁ½ºÏͬÖеÄÁíÒ»µ±ÊÂÈËÔÚÁíÒ»ºÏͬÖÐÎ¥Ô¼,ºóÕß¿ÉÒÔǰÕßÎ¥Ô¼µÄÊÂʵ×÷ΪÆäÎ¥Ô¼µÄ¿¹±çÀíÓÉ,¸ÃÇéÐÎʵÖÊÉÏÊÇÍ»ÆÆºÏͬÏà¶ÔÐÔÔÔòµÄÐÂÀàÐÍ¡£Ä¿Ç°,ËùÓÐÍ»ÆÆºÏͬÏà¶ÔÐÔµÄÀíÂÛºÍÁ¢·¨¾ùδº¸Ç¸ÃÇéÐÎ,ʵ¼ùÖÐÒÑÓÐÖ§³Ö¸Ã¿¹±çÀíÓɵķ¨Ôº²Ã¾ö¡£ÈçºÎʹ¸Ã²Ã¾öÕýµ±»¯?ÒԵ¹ú·¨ÖеĹØÁªºÏÍ¬ÖÆ¶È¼°ÎÒ¹ú×î¸ßÈËÃñ·¨Ôº¡¶¹ØÓÚÉóÀíÉÌÆ··¿ÂòÂôºÏͬ¾À·×°¸¼þÊÊÓ÷¨ÂÉÈô¸ÉÎÊÌâµÄ½âÊÍ¡·µÚ23Ìõ¡¢µÚ24Ìõ¡¢µÚ25ÌõΪÖÐÐÄ,ÍÚ¾òÖÆ¶È±³ºóÔ̺¬µÄ¼ÛֵȡÏò,ʹ·¨¹ÙµÄÅоöÕýµ±»¯,Ìá³öÏà¹ØÌõÎĵĽâÊ͹æÔò¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Contract is the law between the parties and binds parties of contact. When there is some economic relation between two contracts, the person who both are the parties of the two contracts may invoke the non-performance of the other party in the other contract to defense one self¡¯s non-performance in the other contract. The situation actually is the new type of the exception to probity of contract. Nowadays the legal theories don¡¯t cover the situation, but in legal practice, there is a verdict supporting the defence.So it is necessary to interpret the circumstance in a new approach with reference to Art.359 of German Civil Code in order to justify the verdict and improve China legal system.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ºÏͬÏà¶ÔÐÔ£» ¹ØÁªºÏͬ£» ¾¼ÃÕûÌåÐÔ£» ·¨ÂɽâÊÍ£» À©ÕŽâÊÍ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ privity of contract£» relating contract£» economic integrity£» legal interpretation amplified interpretation£»
19 ¡¢¹«Ë¾Éç»áÔðÈÎ˼ÏëÔÚÖ°¹¤ÃñÖ÷¹ÜÀíÖеÄÀíÂÛÒâÒ弰ʵ¼ù Íõ³çÃô£¨º£ÄÏ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;Âí½¨±ø£¨¸ÊËàÕþ·¨Ñ§ÔºÃñÉ̾¼Ã·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ö°¹¤ÃñÖ÷¹ÜÀíÊÇÎÒ¹ú¹«Ë¾·¨ÉϵÄÖØÒªÖÆ¶È,Æä˼ÏëÔ¨Ô´ÓÐÖî¶àÀíÂÛ,¹«Ë¾Éç»áÔðÈÎ˼Ïë±ãÊÇÆäÖÐÖ®Ò»¡£¾ÍÆäÀíÂÛÒâÒå¶øÑÔ,¹«Ë¾Éç»áÔðÈÎ˼Ïë·ñ¶¨Á˸öÌå¾¼ÃÀûÒæºÍ¹«Ë¾¹É¶«ÀûÒæÎ¨Ò»ÂÛ,ÓÐÀûÓÚΪְ¹¤ÕùÈ¡ÔÚ¹«Ë¾ÖеÄÀûÒæµØÎ»;ÖØÊÓ¾¼ÃÉç»áÖеĵÀµÂÒâÒåºÍÂ×Àí¼ÛÖµ,ΪȷÁ¢Ö°¹¤ÃñÖ÷¹ÜÀíµÄ»ù±¾ÔÔòÌṩÁËÖ¸Òý¡£µ«Æä¾ÖÏÞÐÔÔÚÓÚ¶ÔÖ°¹¤¹ÜÀí¹Ø×¢µÄרע³Ì¶È²»¹»,ºÜÄÑÕë¶ÔÖ°¹¤µÄÌØµã³éÏó³öÒ»°ãÔÀí½ø¶øÖ¸µ¼Ö°¹¤¹ÜÀí¹«Ë¾µÄʵ¼ù;ÒÔ¹«Ë¾¼°Æä¹ÜÀíÕßΪ³ö·¢µãµÄµ¥ÏòÐÔ,²»×ãÒÔÖ¤Ã÷Ö°¹¤²ÎÓëÓ°Ï칫˾¾ö²ßµÄÕýµ±ÐÔ;ûÓÐÌÖÂÛ¹«Ë¾Öв»Í¬ÀûÒæÈºÌåÖ®¼äµÄ¹ØÏµ,Òò¶øÔÚÈ·¶¨Ö°¹¤ÃñÖ÷¹ÜÀíÔÚ¹«Ë¾¹ÜÀíÖеĵØÎ»Ê±ÃæÁÙ×ÅÀíÂÛÉϵÄÀ§¾³¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Staff democratic management is an important corporate system in China. Its thought originated from many theories, one of which is corporate social responsibility. The thought of corporate responsibility possess many theoretical significances. It denies the theory that shareholder interest is unique in company, which benefits roles of staff and workers in corporate.Also,the thought emphasizes morality and ethical value in economical society, which provides guidelines on how to establish basic principles on staff democratic management.Nevertheless,there are many limitations of the thought of corporate social responsibility.It pays less attention on staff and worders management, which result difficulties in guiding staff and workers management according to staff and workers characteristics. The thought fails to prove the rightness of employee participation and influence on corporate decision-making because of its unidirectivity from the springboard of company and managers.Farthermore,corporate social responsibility has to face the theoretical predicament on defining the role of staff democratic management in corporate governance because the thought does not explore relations among various interest groups.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ¹«Ë¾Éç»áÔðÈΣ» Ö°¹¤ÃñÖ÷¹ÜÀí£» ÀíÂÛÒâÒ壻 À§¾³£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ corporate social responsibility£» staff democratic management£» theoretical significance£» predicamant£»
20 ¡¢×ʲú֤ȯ»¯Öеij¬¶îµ£±£ÖƶÈÑо¿ Ð캣Ñà;Íõ±û»Ô£¨¶ÔÍâ¾Ã³´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÔÚÎ÷·½×ʲú֤ȯ»¯½ø³ÌÖÐ,ÓÈÆäÊÇÔÚ"ºó½ðÈÚΣ»úʱ´ú",³¬¶îµ£±£ÖƶÈÓÐÖúÓÚ½µµÍͶ×Ê·çÏÕ,Ìá¸ßͶ×ÊÕßÐÅÐÄ,Ïûåô½ðÈÚΣ»úµÄ²»ÀûÓ°Ï졣ΪÎüÈ¡ÃÀ¹ú½ðÈÚΣ»úµÄǰ³µÖ®¼ø,ÎÒ¹úÔÚ×ʲú֤ȯ»¯Æð²½½×¶ÎÓ¦ÒýÈë¸ÃÖÆ¶È¡£³¬¶îµ£±£µÄ±¾ÖÊÊÇծȨÖÊѺ,ÆäÖÊѺ±êµÄÊǽ«À´Õ®È¨¡£ÔÚÎÒ¹úÏÖÐз¨ÂÉÌåϵÏÂ,³¬¶îµ£±£ÊÜÖÆÓÚÏÖÐеÄÖÊÑºÖÆ¶ÈºÍÆÆ²ú·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈÉè¼Æ¡£ÎÒ¹úÓ¦ÖÆ¶¨×¨Ãŵġ¶×ʲú֤ȯ»¯·¨¡·,Ã÷È·×ʲú֤ȯ»¯µÄÐÔÖÊ,²¢¶Ô֤ȯ»¯×ʲúµÄ¿ÉÈÃÓëÐԺͳöÖÊÎÊÌâÓèÒÔרÃŹ涨,´Ó¶øÊ¹³¬¶îµ£±£ÖƶȼȷûºÏÎïȨ·¨¶¨ÔÔò,ÓÖÂú×ãÏÖʵÐèÒª¡£Í¨¹ý¿ØÖƳ¬¶î±ÈÂʺÍÉèÖÃÀû²îÕË»§,ÒÔ½â¾ö³¬¶îµ£±£ÓëÏÖÐÐÆÆ²ú·¨ÂÉÖ®¼äµÄ³åÍ»ÎÊÌâ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ During the process of Securitization in the West, especially in the "post-crisis era¡±, Over-collateralization(OC) is a powerful method of credit enhancement by lowering the creditor¡¯s exposure to default risk, improving the confidence of investors, promoting recovery of liquidity and to some extent, eliminating the negative impact of financial crisis. To draw a lesson from the U.S.financial crisis,OC should be introduced at the initial stage of securitization in China.OC is essentially a debt pledge whose subject is future claims. Under the current legal system,the main legal obstacles in conflict with OC are from Guaranty Law and Bankruptcy Law.On the one hand,"Asset Securitization Law" should be developed as soon as possible in order to clear the essence of asset securitization and elaborate transferability and pledge-ability of the original assets; on the other hand, by controlling the OC rate and establishing the spread account,OC can be consistent with the current Bankruptcy Law.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ³¬¶îµ£±££» ծȨÖÊѺ£» ÕæÊµ³öÊÛ£» ÆÆ²ú¸ôÀ룻
¡¾Key words¡¿ over-collateralization£» pledge of obligation£» true sale£» bankruptcy remote£»
21 ¡¢ÂÛÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûµÄ´´ÔìÐÔÈ϶¨ ÑîÏÔ±õ£¨ÉϺ£½»Í¨´óѧ¿Ô·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ëæ×ÅÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûÇÖȨ°¸¼þµÄÈÕÒæÔö¶à,ÈçºÎÈ϶¨Ò»¸öÐÂÖÐÒ©µ¥·½ÊÇ·ñ¹¹³É¶ÔÏÖÓÐÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûµÄÇÖȨ,ÏÔµÃÓÈÎªÖØÒª¡£°´ÕÕÎÒ¹ú¡¶×¨Àû·¨¡·µÄ¹æ¶¨,±ØÐë¾¹ý"ÈýÐÔ"È϶¨,¶øÐÂÖÐÒ©µ¥·½"ÈýÐÔ"È϶¨µÄ¹Ø¼üÔÚÓÚÆäÓëÏÖÓеÄÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûÏà±ÈÊÇ·ñ¾ßÓд´ÔìÐÔ¡£Òò´Ë,¾¡¿ìÖÆ¶¨ÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûµÄ´´ÔìÐÔÈ϶¨±ê×¼ÆÈÔÚü½Þ¡£µ±ÐÂÖÐÒ©µ¥·½ÓëÏÖÓеÄÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûÏà±ÈʹÓÃÁ˲»Í¬µÄÒ©Óò¿·Ö¡¢²»Í¬µÄ¼ÁÐ͵¼Ö¸øÒ©Í¾¾¶¸Ä±ä¡¢²»Í¬µÄÅÚÖÆ·½·¨µ¼Ö¹龸ı䡢²»Í¬Éú²ú·½·¨¡¢¹¤ÒÕ¼°Ôö¼Ó»òʹÓò»Í¬µÄÒýÒ©¡¢¸Ä±äÏÖÓÐÖÐÒ©µ¥·½×¨ÀûµÄ»ìºÏÎï×é·Ö»ò×é³É»ìºÏÎï×é·ÖµÄ¼ÁÁ¿µÈʱ,Èç¹ûÆäÄÜÔÚ×÷ÓÃͬһ²¡Ö¢µÄ²»Í¬ÀàÐÍ¡¢¼õÉÙ¶¾¸±×÷Óá¢ÏÔÖøÌá¸ßÁÆÐ§¡¢ÊÊӦеIJ¡Ö¢¡¢×÷ÓÃеIJ¿Î»µÈÈκÎÒ»·½ÃæÓÐËùÍ»ÆÆ,¾ÍÓ¦µ±È϶¨¸ÃÐÂÖÐÒ©µ¥·½¶ÔÖÐÒ©ÁìÓòµÄÆÕͨ¼¼ÊõÈËÔ±À´Ëµ¾ßÓÐ"·ÇÏÔ¶øÒ×¼ûÐÔ",ÓÐÍ»³öµÄʵÖÊÐÔÌØµãºÍÏÔÖøµÄ½ø²½,¾ßÓд´ÔìÐÔ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ With the increase of the infringement cases of the traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents,how to identify whether a new traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism infringes the existing traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents,which becomes particularly important.According to the requirements of our county¡¯s Patent Law,it must go through the indenfication of creativeness,practicality and novelty,the key to the indenfication of creativeness,practicality and novelty of the new traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism lies in whether the new traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism possesses creativeness compared with the existing traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents.Therefore,drawing up the recognized standard of the creativeness of the traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents is urgent.When the new traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism compared to the existing traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents uses different medical parts,different formulations leading to change of the way of taking medicine,different processing methods resulting in the change of tropism channel,different production methods,process and increases or uses different leading traditional Chinese medicine,changes the parts of components of the existing traditional Chinese medicine unilateral patents or the doses of consisting of conponents,and so on,if they have any one breakthrough in working different kinds of the same illness,cutting down the poisonous side effects,notably improving curative effects,adapting to the new illness,working new locations,and so on,so that we can say the new traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism possesses of "not noticeable" towards average technicians in traditional Chinese medicine field,have dramatically substantial characteristic and notable progress,own creativeness.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÖÐÒ©µ¥·½£» ´´ÔìÐÔ£» ´´ÔìÐÔÈ϶¨£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ the traditional Chinese medicine unilateralism£» creativeness£» identification of the creativeness£»
22 ¡¢ÇåÄ©·¨ÂɸĸïºÎÒÔÈç´Ë¼èÄÑ »Æ´ºÑࣨɽ¶«Õþ·¨Ñ§Ôº·¨Ñ§Ôº£©;
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ѻƬսÕùÒÔºó,¹ú¼Ò´¦ÔÚΣÍöÖ®¼Ê,ÇåÕþ¸®½øÐÐÁËÊ·ÎÞǰÀýµÄÈ«·½Î»µÄ·¨Âɸĸï,¿ªÆôÁËÖйú·¨Âɽü´úתÐ͵ÄÀúÊ·º½³Ì¡£ÓÉÓÚÄÚÓÇÍ⻼µÄ½ôÆÈÐÎÊÆ,±ä·¨Í¼Ç¿³ÉΪµÚÒ»ÒªÎñ,¶ø¶Ô·¨ÂÉ×ÔÉíµÄ·¢Õ¹¹æÂɹØ×¢²»¹»,ÇåÄ©·¨ÂÉ¸Ä¸ï½øÐе÷dz£¼èÄÑ¡£ÓÉÓÚ²»ÊÇÉç»áÄÚ²¿Á¦Á¿µÄÍÆ¶¯,¶øÊÇÔÚÉç»áÍⲿÁ¦Á¿µÄ³å»÷ϱ»ÆÈ½øÐеÄÒ»´Î¸Ä¸ï,Ôì³ÉÁË·¨ÂÉÓ봫ͳÎÄ»¯ÆõºÏµÄ¼èÄÑ¡£×Ô´ÓÇå´ú·¨Âɸĸï,Öйú·¨Âɽü´ú»¯¡¢ÏÖ´ú»¯ÒÑÑÝÒï°ÙÓàÄê,Ö±µ½½ñÌì,ÈçºÎʵÏÖÖйú´«Í³ÎÄ»¯ÓëÖйú·¨ÂÉÏÖ´ú»¯Ö®¼äµÄ¶Ô½Ó¡¢ÆõºÏ,ÈÔÈ»ÊÇÎÒÃDZØÐëÃæ¶ÔµÄÖØ´óÀíÂÛ¡¢Êµ¼ù¿ÎÌâ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ After the Opium War, China is in peril on the occasion. Qing government implemented an unprecedented comprehensive legal reform, opening the historical range of modernization of Chinese law on the transformation. Under the pressing internal and external situation, reforms in order to a strong country are the top priority, while the development of the law is not concerned, so the late Qing legal reform is very difficult. As it is not within the community forces, but in the impact of social external forces, the legal reform had a difficult fit with the traditional culture. Since the late Qing legal reform, modernization of Chinese law has lasted over a hundred years. Even today, how to achieve the fit between the China¡¯s traditional culture and modernization of China¡¯s law is still an important theoretical and practical issue we have to face.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿ ÇåÄ©·¨Âɸĸ ·¨Âɽü´ú»¯£» ´«Í³ÎÄ»¯£» ·¨ÂÉÐÅÑö£»
¡¾Key words¡¿ the legal reform in late Qing dynasty£» legal modernization£» tradition culture£» legal faith£»
ÈÕÆÚ£º2012-7-24 14:51:48 | ¹Ø±Õ | ·ÖÏíµ½£º