当前位置：法律图书馆>>法治动态>>期刊目录>>《法学论坛》2012年第二期目录与摘要
《法学论坛》2012年第二期目录与摘要
http://www.cnhottime.cn 2012-7-24 14:50:52 来源：中国法学会网
1 、关于劳务派遣单位与劳务用工单位的侵权责任——兼论《侵权责任法》第34条第2款的适用 郭明瑞（山东大学法学院）;
【摘要】 劳务派遣单位与劳务用工单位的侵权责任是用人单位责任的一种特殊形态。采用劳务派遣用工方式时,劳务用工单位责任的理论基础为报偿说,适用无过错责任原则。劳务派遣单位责任的理论基础为控制理论,适用过错责任原则。劳务派遣单位与劳务用工单位均为责任主体时,用工单位应先承担责任,劳务派遣单位承担与其过错相应的补充责任。用工单位承担全部责任后,可以向劳务派遣单位追偿。劳务派遣单位虽不能以劳务派遣协议中有免除其责任的约定对抗受害人要求赔偿的请求,但可以以此作为对抗用工单位追偿请求的抗辩事由。
【Abstract】 The tort liability of the unit of labor dispatch and labor employment is the special form of the employer liability. The liability of the unit of labor employment is no-fault liability and the theoretical basis is the risks and benefits should belong to the same person. The liability of the unit of labor dispatch is fault liability and the theoretical basis is the control theory. When the unit of labor employment and the unit of labor dispatch are both the liability subject, the unit of labor employment should bear the liability first and the unit of labor dispatch will bear the supplementary liability according to his fault. If the unit of labor employment bears all the liability, he can recourse to the unit of labor dispatch. Although the unit of labor dispatch can’t defense the damages requests of the victim with the waiver liability article in the labor dispatch agreement, but the unit can defense the unit of labor employment by the waiver article. 更多还原
【关键词】 劳务派遣； 劳务用工； 补充责任；
【Key words】 labor dispatch； labor employment； supplementary liability；
2 、共同危险行为争议问题探析 叶金强（南京大学法学院）;
【摘要】 共同危险行为属于责任者不明型共同侵权,其与份额不明型共同组成客观共同侵权之类型。此类共同侵权中连带责任的正当化基础为可能因果关系,故当行为人证明自己的行为与损害间不存在因果关系时,便可免于承担责任。共同危险行为制度同样可以适用于无过错责任领域。共同危险行为与共同过失型共同侵权的区分,主要看行为人是否具有共同过失,共同过失表现为基于一致的行为安排而作出一定行为,而该行为中含有可预见并可避免的致害可能性。
【Abstract】 The joint dangerous act belongs to the joint tort where the person liable can’t be determined. The joint dangerous act and the joint tort where the portion of liability can’t be determined together constitute the type of objective joint tort. The possible causation justifies joint and several liability in the objective joint tort, so one who adduces evidence to prove that there is no causation between his behavior and the damage could be exempted from liability. The system of joint dangerous act also applies to the area of liability without fault. The distinctions of joint tort between the joint dangerous act and the joint negligence mainly depend on whether actors are common negligence. That tortfeasors’ conducts where it is possible to foresee and avoid the damage are based on consistent behavior arrangements characterizes the joint negligence.
【关键词】 共同危险行为； 连带责任基��； 免责事由；
【Key words】 joint dangerous act； the base on joint and several liability； excuse for exemption；
3 、产品责任中生产者和销售者之间的不真正连带责任——以《侵权责任法》第五章为分析对象 高圣平（中国人民大学民商法律科学研究中心）;
【摘要】 在产品责任中,生产者和销售者之间虽然存在不真正连带责任关系,但该不真正连带责任区别于传统意义上的不真正连带责任。在我国《侵权责任法》中,该不真正连带责任是立法者有意选择的价值调整工具,具有不同于传统不真正连带责任的新特质。生产者和销售者之间的不真正连带责任存在内部追偿权,具有价值缓冲作用。仅从《侵权责任法》的现有规定来看,这种内部追偿权是一种新的权利,而非让与请求权或法定赔偿代位。
【Abstract】 In the context of product liability law, there’s unreal joint and several liability between the producer and the seller.However,it is different from the traditional unreal joint and several liability. Under the Tort Law of China(TLC),the unreal joint and several liability between the producer and the seller is intentionally stipulated to adjust the value, and has the characteristics beyond the traditional one. It exists the right of recourse between the producer and the seller. This right of recourse has the function of value buffer. In the context of TLC,this right of recourse is a new-born right, not the transfer of a claim nor statutory subrogation of compensation.
【关键词】 产品责任； 不真正连带责任； 连带债务； 追偿权；
【Key words】 product liability； unreal joint and several liability； joint and several liability； the right of recourse；
4 、侵权连带责任的现实类型 张平华（烟台大学法学院）;
【摘要】 侵权连带责任可分为"一般类型"和"特殊类型"�！肚秩ㄔ鹑畏ā飞系囊话闱秩鹑我怨餐秩ㄎ行�,而特殊侵权连带责任的适用范围则变动不羁。全面考察侵权连带责任的现实类型,可以发现:一般侵权连带责任不限于共同侵权,还可基于合同或"侵害行为直接结合"而生;特殊侵权连带责任是政策衡量的产物,可广泛适用于控制危险致害、提供场所者责任、惩治挂靠经营、提升信用者责任以及独立责任之衡平等场合。 更多还原
【Abstract】 Joint and several liability in tort law can be separated to general and special type. The general type in Chinese Tort Liability Law centered on joint tort, and the scope of special type changes unruly. If research the actual type thoroughly, we will find that the general type is not only joint tort but the joint liability based on contract or concurrent act, and the special type can be used to control danger, the liability of management place supplier, the liability of credit enhance and the equitable of independent liability.
【关键词】 侵权连带责任； 现实类型； 一般； 特殊；
【Key words】 joint and several liability in tort law； actual type； general； special；
5 、中国企业赴美并购的法律风险及其防范对策 刘俊海（中国人民大学法学院）;
【摘要】 中国企业在赴美并购过程中总存在着各种各样的法律风险。中国国有企业赴美并购时应高度重视美国的国家安全审查机制,清晰地突出国有企业的商事主体性质。而美国外资委员会引入听证会程序,应充分听取中国投资者的意见,放弃投资�；ぶ饕�。中国企业要熟悉美国的公司并购规则与治理规则,明确目标公司选择符合本公司及其股东利益最大化的收购要约而并非现金出价最多的要约,是美国公司并购的常态。中美双方加快双边投资�；ばǖ奶概薪�,就企业的国有化条款而言,应采取充分的市场化补偿标准。我国政府鼓励企业赴美并购,可将核准制改为备案制。要加快建立健全海外投资纠纷的仲裁机制,提高我国仲裁机构的国际竞争力。
【Abstract】 There are various legal risks in the process of Chinese M&As in USA.Chinese state-owned enterprises should pay great attention to national security censorship in USA,and demonstrate their commercial entity feature.CFIUS introduce to the hearing process,should accommodate the opinions of Chinese investors, and abandon investment protectionism. Chinese corporations should learn American legal rules of corporate governance and M&A,Choice the offer that conform the interest of target corporation and its chareholders,not the offer that highest bid in cash.US and China should accelerate the process of the negotiation of bilateral investment treaty,and establish the compensation at fair market value.Chinses goverment should encourage Chinese corporation to mergers and acquisitions in USA,abolish the approval policy while introducing registration policy, and to strengthen the international competitiveness of Chinese arbitration bodies.
【关键词】 公司并购； 国家安全审查； 法律风险； 法律对策；
【Key words】 M&A； national security censorship； legal risks； legal strategy；
6 、中国企业赴美国上市的法律风险和对策 邱永红（深圳证卷交易所法律部）;
【摘要】 随着大量中国企业赴美国上市,与之相关的法律风险问题也逐渐暴露。当前,中国企业在美国上市的法律风险主要包括集团诉讼风险、证券违法违规处罚风险、退市风险、做空风险和中介机构欺诈风险。因此,中国企业赴美上市应充分了解、熟悉和掌握美国资本市场的相关法律和监管要求,并完善公司治理结构、内部控制和信息披露制度,以及提高应对集团诉讼的能力。
【Abstract】 With many Chinese companies seeking to get listed on the U.S.securities markets in recent years, relevant legal risks have gradually emerged.Currently,major legal risks that Chinese companies face include collective litigation risk, on-compliance punishment risk, delisting risk, short-position risk and intermediary institution fraud risk. Chinese enterprises listed in the United States should be fully aware、 familiar and master the requirements of the legal and regulatory relating with U.S.capital markets, improve the system of corporate governance structure, internal control and information disclosure, as well as improve the ability of responding to class action suits.
【关键词】 美国上市； 法律风险； 集团诉讼； 退市；
【Key words】 listing on the U.S.securities markets； legal risks； collective litigation； delisting；
7 、企业海外并购的国家安全审查风险及其法律对策 贺丹（北京师范大学法学院）;
【摘要】 国家安全审查是对企业海外并购影响最大的贸易�；ご胧�。近年来,数个国家对其外资监管法律进行了修改,其共性是建立或完善外资并购国家安全审查制度。这种对国家安全审查的关注和强调已经成为中国企业海外并购所面临的最大法律风险。从国家安全审查的法律实践中可见两个明显趋势:国家安全概念的扩张与审查过程中政治考量因素的增加,但中国企业应将政治风险与政治因素转换为法律层面的问题,合理进行并购申报,并通过东道国诉讼程序、WTO规则、双边投资�；ばǖ榷嘀址墒侄挝ぷ陨砝�,减少贸易�；ぶ饕宥院Ｍ獠⒐旱奈：�。
【Abstract】 National security review is one of the trade protection measures which will make greatest impact on the overseas acquisition. In recent years, several countries had amended their foreign regulatory law, common feature of which is to establish or improve their national security review institution of foreign acquisitions. This concerns and stressing of national security review has become the biggest legal risks faced by Chinese enterprises in their overseas mergers and acquisitions. Two distinct trends can be seen in the legal practice of national security review: expansion of the national security concept and increase of political considerations. However, Chinese enterprises should adopt legal measures such as reasonable acquisitions notice, the judicial review of the host country, the WTO rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty and other legal means to safeguard their own interests, to reduce the hazards of trade protectionism to overseas mergers and acquisitions.
【关键词】 海外并购； 国家安全审查； 法律对策；
【Key words】 national security review； overseas acquisition； legal countermeasures；
8 、重思民事责任能力与民事行为能力的关系——兼评我国《侵权责任法》第32条 杨代雄（华东政法大学法律学院）;
【摘要】 民事责任能力在本质上是广义民事行为能力的一种,与狭义民事行为能力即法律行为能力并列,它是当事人对其过错行为承担民事责任的法律前提。广义民事行为能力概念具有深厚的历史根基,我国民法学者对其进行批判是因为对其历史脉络缺乏了解。民事责任能力的认定应采抽象标准与具体认定相结合主义。我国《侵权责任法》第32条存在诸多缺陷,应通过法律解释或修订予以完善 。
【Abstract】 In essence, capacity for civil liability is a kind of capacity for civil disposition in the broad sense. As a premise for the party to bear the liability for his wrongful conduct, capacity for civil liability is different from capacity for civil disposition in the narrow sense which is called capacity for legal transaction. The concept of capacity for civil disposition in the broad sense has a deep historical root that remains unknown to Chinese scholars who criticize this concept. Capacity for civil liability should be judged by Abstract criteria and sometimes should also consider concrete factors relating to intelligence of the party. There are several defects in article 32 of The Tort Law of PRC that should be perfected through revision or legal interpretation.
【关键词】 民事责任； 责任能力； 过错能力； 民事行为能力； 侵权责任法；
【Key words】 civil liability； capacity for liability； capacity for wrong； capacity for civil disposition； tort law；
9 、司法判决过程中的道德论证 许娟（中南民族大学法学院）;
【摘要】 当非理性民权表达充斥司法判决之时,势必要澄清和阐明司法判决过程中的道德论证,势必要在柔性实证主义(分离命题)和吸纳性整体阐释(统一命题)之间交往商谈,从这个意义上说,道德是可以论证的。在司法判决现实情境之下,道德论证在大前提论证中起到经验论证、非实证和非经验论证两项作用。
【Abstract】 When irrational civil rights expression occupy judicial decision, is bound to clarify and to clarify the moral argument in the process of judicial decisions, is bound to discuss the interaction between the flexible positivism and absorbing whole explanation. In this sense, morality is arguable. Under the realistic scenarios of judicial decisions, the moral argument play two roles including experience demonstrated, on-empirical and non-experience, demonstrated in the premise of the argument.
【关键词】 道德论证； 权利话语； 理性论辩； 程序；
【Key words】 moral argument； rights discourse； rational argument； program；
10 、英国宪政的精髓:议会主权与司法独立相结合的宪政体制 李栋（中南财经政法大学法学院）;
【摘要】 英国作为创建近代宪政制度的开路先锋,既没有成熟的宪政模式可资借鉴,也缺乏系统的宪政理论以供指导。然而,英国宪政却在实践中运行顺畅、效果良好,并在总体上表现出平稳性与实用性的特征。造成这一现象的根本原因在于,议会主权与司法独立相结合的宪政体制。前者关乎国家的内政、外交及其国家治理,通过不同权力之间的配置制约王权;后者关乎社会秩序与正义,通过特殊的"技艺理性",以看似顽固不变的改良方式维持着对于任何专断权力的制约。
【Abstract】 As a pioneer in modern constitution system, the constitution of England has neither the political model to learn, nor the wonderful constitution theory to guide.However,it runs smoothly and gets good effect in practice, of which has the feature of stability and practicality in general. The root cause is the combination of parliamentary sovereignty and independence of the justice. The former restrict royal power by the different power configuration, thus it has the close relation with the country’s internal and foreign affairs and national governance. While the latter relates to the social order and justice, which constantly constraint any arbitrary power by a special "Artificial reason".
【关键词】 英国宪政； 议会主权； 司法独立；
【Key words】 the constitution of england； parliamentary sovereignty； independence of the justice；
11 、社会法学派的法律发现观及其启示 张志文（重庆大学法学院）;
【摘要】 社会法学派的法律发现观主要从目的、利益与法律的"自由"发现、返回司法"实际"的法律发现、司法的实用性与规则的虚无性三个角度来诠释的。与其我们掩耳盗铃式"发现法律",不如坦白承认法官造法之于司法公正的意义。"发现"是"创造"的源泉,而"创造"是"发现"的延伸。
【Abstract】 Legal Finding in law of society thinks purpose and interests could influence the free finding of law. The practicability of justice and nihility of rule also is the starting pointing of free law finding. Judges’ creating law is very important for the judicial justice. Finding law is the source of creating law, and the latter is the extension of the former.
【关键词】 法律发现； 法律创造； 社会法学；
【Key words】 legal finding； cresting law； law of society；
12 、行政行为附款新探 李垒（浙江大学法学院）;
【摘要】 行政行为的附款包括条件、期限、负担、负担保留以及废止保留等类型。信赖�；ぴ谛姓形涓蛳鹬惺侵匾目剂恳蛩�,但信赖�；ざ杂诟娇钚姓形欠褚廊皇视迷蛞栏娇罾嘈偷牟煌樾味�。比例原则是判断附款是否违法不当的重要标准,其不仅在附款形式的选择方面,而且在附款的实质内容方面,都有其具体的运用。当附款违法时,相对人最有效的救济方式,应是提起课予义务之诉,请求法院依据附款违法类型采取不同的权利�；し绞�;而不是以附款与主行政行为是否可分为标准来决定是否采取单独撤销附款之诉的权利救济方式。
【Abstract】 The subsidiary constrains in administrative law includes conditions,period,burden,reserved burden and reserved abolition. Reliance protection plays an important role in considering about changing and eliminating administrative action.However,whether the reliance protection can be still applied to the administrative action with subsidiary constrains depends on the variety of subsidiary constrains. The proportionality principle is an important standard in determining if subsidiary constrains is illegal or improper. What’s more, this principle is adopted specifically in two respects: the form selection of subsidiary constrains and the substantial content of subsidiary constrains. When subsidiary constrains are illegal, for private party, the most effective way of relief is to take a proceedings of appealing to obligations and request court take corresponding remedies according to the variety of illegal subsidiary constrains rather than take a proceedings of separate revocation based on the standard of whether subsidiary constrains can be separated from main administrative action. 更多还原
【关键词】 行政行为； 附款； 比例原则； 信赖�；�； 课予义务之诉；
【Key words】 administrative action； subsidiary constrains； the proportionality principle； reliance protection； the proceedings of appealing to obligations；
13 、论知识产权的私权属性——关于“知识产权的公权化理论”的置疑 于志强（中国政法大学民商经济法学院）;
【摘要】 知识产权与其他民事权利一样具有私权的属性。知识产权的私权属性区别于其他民事权利而有其特殊性,以至于有些学者在不否认知识产权的私权属性的前提下提出了知识产权的公权化理论,并试图用该理论来解释一些知识产权面临的新问题。知识产权的公权化理论是对私权理论的一种错误的解读,知识产权的私权属性不会也不可能改变或者会具有双重属性。
【Abstract】 Intellectual property and other civil rights as a private right. Private attribute of intellectual property has its particularity different from other civil rights, some scholars put forward the theory of public rights of intellectual property without denying private attribute of intellectual property under the premise and try to explain some new intellectual property problems on this theory. The theory of public rights of intellectual property is a kind of wrong interpretation on the theory of private rights of intellectual property, private attribute of intellectual property will not and cannot be changed or has the dual attributes.
【关键词】 知识产权； 公权化； 私权性；
【Key words】 intellectual property； public right； private right；
14 、食品安全非监管保障措施的引入与规制 隋洪明（西南政法大学经济法学院）;
【摘要】 针对我国食品安全事故频发,食品安全环境日益恶化等突出问题,绝大多数专家学者研究的结论是"监管缺失",然而,沿此思路提出的对策和政府部门为加强监管付出的努力并没有取得明显的成效。"三聚氰胺"、"毒大米"、"地沟油"等仍然畅通无阻地越过道道监管关卡,通过各种渠道流向公众的餐桌。因此,有必要反思"主流研究"的偏差,改变"监管依赖"思维模式,加强非监管机制研究,构建企业自律、公众参与、信用建设和信息传递等非监管制度,弥补监管制度的不足,走出食品安全监管劳而无功的困境,塑造放心、健康、和谐的食品安全环境。
【Abstract】 In view of the problems of China’s food safety accidents occur frequently, and food safety environment worsen, mostly experts think the reason is "regulatory loss”. However, there is no obvious effect about the countermeasures of this thought, and the effort for strengthening the supervision."3 get together cyanogen amine" "poison rice" and "edible oils" is still could pass the supervision gate through various channels to flow to the public’s table,therefore,it is necessary to reflect on "mainstream" deviation, change "regulatory rely on" mode of thinking, strengthen the supervision mechanism research, to set up the business enterprise self-discipline, public participation, credit construction and information transfer and other the supervision system, make up the deficiency of the supervision system, enrich regulating security mechanism, out of food safety monitoring and the plight of one, building the rest assured,healthy,harmonious food security environment.
【关键词】 食品安全； 非监管； 保障措施；
【Key words】 food safety； outside government； security measures；
15 、食品安全立法技术的限度及其修正 余丹（中国计量学院法学院）;
【摘要】 目前,食品安全立法技术是基于完全理性论基础上制定的,这种立法理念是相信人拥有完全理性认识能力,对一切事物采取正面看法,其立法技术特征是以"增进善"为立法目的,因而在力图表明技术指标确定性的同时,导致了片面性�？蒲д苎Ъ也ㄆ斩�、库恩的有限理性论则认为,衡量一种理论科学地位的标准不是"可证实",而是"可证伪性"或"可反驳性",在此立法理念指引下的立法技术特征表现为:立法目的并不一定会"增善",但却可以"减少恶"。因此,以有限理性论为分析视角,可修正立法技术,使立法技术指标不仅具有确定性,更具有全面性。
【Abstract】 The present, according to the absolute-rationalism, the lawmaking technology of food safety is set down, this lawmaking conception is that believe man hold the absolute-rational recognizing capability and treated as anything from obverse, which the character of legislation technology regard "increasing good" as the aim of lawmaking,therfore,the determinacy cause the one-sidedness at one time.Berpl and Kun,the scientist and philosopher, their limited-rationalism think that the rule of a theory science is not "conformable" but "fake-testified" or "contradicted”, which the character of lawmaking technology is that the aim of lawmaking is not to increase good but decease bad.Therefore,we can amend the legislation technology by the analysis visual of the limited-rationalism, which will made lawmaking technology not only the determinacy, but also the perfectibility.
【关键词】 食品安全； 立法技术； 有限理性； 认知范式；
【Key words】 food security； lawmaking technology； limited rationalism； cognize pattern；
16 、我国集体协商制度实证主义建构的法哲学反思 曹燕（西北政法大学经济法学院）;
【摘要】 我国集体协商制度之所以未能实现和谐劳动关系的规制功能,主要原因之一,在于其制度建构的实证主义哲学观使实现集体行动合法化、体现劳资自治的"争议权"在制度构造上缺乏合法地位。虽然"争议权"的行使可能引发法的正当性与安定性之间的矛盾,但是,基于自然法的理论分析,"争议权"的行使与维持劳动关系稳定的目标并不冲突。在追求劳动关系正义的基本宗旨下,通过拓宽集体交涉的法律途径可实现争议权在实证法上的合法地位。
【Abstract】 The major cause of collective negotiation syestem,based on positivism, failing to achieve harmonious labor relation is lacking of the collective bargaining power, which maybe leads to the labor law system conflicts. However, trough the natural philosophy analysis, the collective bargaining power does not come into conflict with the harmonious labor relation.
【关键词】 集体协商； 争议权； 实证主义法哲学； 自然法哲学；
【Key words】 conllective negociation syestem； collective bargaining power； legal positivism； nature philosiphy；
17 、被害人作证及其陈述的运用 兰跃军（中国政法大学研究生院）;
【摘要】 2011年国际货币基金组织前总裁斯特劳斯.卡恩性侵案经过长达3个月诉讼后被撤销,凸显了被害人作证及其陈述证据效力的特殊性。被害人和证人虽然都"身临其境",目睹了犯罪事实的发生过程,但被害人还"身受其害",这决定了被害人作证与证人作证既有共同点又存在许多重大差异,二者不能混同。被害人的当事性要求立法从作证适格性、传闻证据规则、意见证据规则、任意性规则、关联性规则及合法性规则六个方面对被害人陈述的证据能力进行合理限制;同时规定被害人陈述原则上不能作为定罪的唯一根据,其证明力需要补强。
【Abstract】 Although the victim and witness are all immersed, witnessed the facts of the crime occurrence process, but the victim suffers its pollution "is”, this determines the victim to testify and witnesses both similarities and differences, there are many major. Both cannot mix business with pleasure. The victim of the parties from testifying comfortable sex requirement legislation lattice, Hearsay rules, Opinion evidence rules, Arbitrariness rules, Relevance rules and legitimacy rules Six aspects to the victim statements evidence ability reasonable limit, Also stipulates that the victim as stated in principle cannot be the only according to conviction, The proof strength need fill strong.
【关键词】 被害人作证； 被害人陈述； 证据能力； 证明力；
【Key words】 victim to testify； victim statement； admissibility； probative；
18 、罪刑相适应原则在解释论中的贯彻 陈洪兵（南京师范大学法学院）;
【摘要】 罪刑相适应不仅是立法原则,还是解释论应当遵循的重要原则,对构成要件的解释具有重要的指导作用。坚持严格区分法条竞合与想象竞合犯,固守"本法另有规定的,依照规定"表明只能适用特别法的先前理解,总是指责立法存在缺陷,必然导致罪刑不均衡的刑法条文比比皆是的现象。我们应当果断摒弃先前错误的理解与做法,在解释论中最大限度地贯彻罪刑相适应原则,充分运用竞合论原理"从一重处断",以实现刑法的公平正义。
【Abstract】 Suiting punishment to crime is not only legislative principle, but also principle of interpretative theory. It is an important guiding role of the interpretation of constitutive requirements. Previous understanding that is Sticking to different strictly overlap of articles of law from imaginative joinder of offenses usually cause imbalance of crime and punishment. We should prohibits decisively the previous understanding and adapt the principle of suiting punishment to crime in interpretative theory in maximum scale for realizing fairness and justice of criminal law.
【关键词】 罪刑相适应； 解释论； 竞合； 从一重处断；
【Key words】 suiting punishment to crime； interpretative theory； concurrence； choosing felony and giving severe punishment；
19 、从认知思维到情动思维——裁判思维客观过程之研究 李可（东南大学法学院）;
【摘要】 认知思维与情动思维是司法过程中前后相继的两种思维方式,它们在形成裁判结果的机制中行使着不同的职能,并且前者在裁判中必然要向后者发生转换。但是,法官必须对此种转换之程序、原则和结果予以合理性论证,否则,易遭受裁判恣意之诟病。
【Abstract】 There are two thinking ways of cognitive and feeling that are end to end in judicial process, which exercise different functions in the mechanism of formation judicial result.Furthermore,the former converts inevitably to the latter during judgment. But a judge had to rationality this kind of conversion of the procedures, principles and results, otherwise is liable to suffer this denounce of unbridled judgment.
【关键词】 认知思维； 情动思维； 司法裁判； 合理性论证；
【Key words】 cognitive thinking； feeling thinking； judicial adjudication； rationality；
20 、司法社会工作概念的缺位及其补足 何明升（华东政法大学社会发展学院）;
【摘要】 近年来,我国的司法社会工作相当活跃,不仅在青少年、禁毒和社区矫正这三个主要分支领域取得了令人瞩目的实践成果,而且也厘清了各分支学科的概念和边界。但是,作为总和概念的司法社会工作称谓,却仍然是混沌不清的。这种分支概念清晰与总和概念混沌并存的状态,反映了司法社会工作在不同实践领域的分立状态。理论上的滞后尤其是概念的缺失是需要尽快弥补的。为此,在梳理和对比国内外司法社会工作的实践逻辑、价值取向和工作理念基础上,提出了一个归纳性定义:司法社会工作是一个由特定价值理念与实践逻辑所决定的复合系统,社会工作机构及其从业人员与司法机构在其中相互依托,面向罪错者、受害人以及相关利益人中的受助者,通过充分发展其全部潜能而推动社会变革、改善人际关系和促进问题解决。
【Abstract】 Recently justice social work in China is very active, which not only achieves the significant practices in the fields of the youth, drug and community correction, but also clarifies the identification and the boundary.However,as the total concept, the justice social work is called nebulously. The situation of coexistence reflects departed states of justice social work in various fields. The theoretical lag, especially the lack of the concept need recuperated as soon as possible.Therefore,this article concludes and compares the practical logic, value tendency and working ideas home and abroad. It tries to give the concept, which is that justice social work is a complex system determined of a specific value idea and the practical logic. The Social work organizations and the employees rely on each other towards Crime wrong persons, victims and recipients in the inter-benefits. Finally they can promote the social innovation by fully development of all potentials and improve interpersonal relationships and promote problem-solving.
【关键词】 司法社会工作； 概念； 实践逻辑； 价值取向；
【Key words】 Justice social work； concept； practical logic； value tendency；
21 、论票据单纯交付转让的效力 董翠香（山东大学法学院）;
【摘要】 我国票据立法并未明确规定票据单纯交付的效力,理论界主流观点认为,票据只能通过背书方式转让,不能以单纯交付方式转让。传统票据法理论同时认可票据背书与单纯交付转让的效力,世界各国和地区票据立法均认可票据单纯交付的效力,我国司法实践也普遍承认票据单纯交付转让的效力。我国《票据法》应当明确规定票据转让方式及空白票据转让方式,承认票据单纯交付转让的效力。
【Abstract】 The validity of transferring bills without endorsement isn’t stipulated in our law of bill. The major academic view believes that bills can only be transferred with endorsement.However,the validity of transferring bills with and without endorsement are both recognized in traditional theories of bill transferring. Many other countries acknowledge the validity of transferring bills without endorsement, so does our judicial practice.Therefore,the methodology of transferring bills(includes blank bills)should be accurately legislated by the law of bill,where as the validity of transferring bills without endorsement needs to be recognized.
【关键词】 票据背书； 票据单纯交付； 无记名支票； 空白票据；
【Key words】 endorsement； transfer bills without endorsement； non-signature check；
22 侵权债权在破产程序中的优先受偿顺位建构——基于“给最少受惠者最大利益”的考量 林一（华东政法大学研究生院）;
【摘要】 破产法的公平理念以及侵权债权的非自愿属性,决定侵权债权具有从现行破产法所规定的普通破产债权中分立出来,并优先于一般交易债权受偿的正当性�；谇秩ㄕɡ嘈突约奥薅沟墓降恼謇砟睢钌偈芑菡咦畲罄�,侵权债权在区分人身侵权债权和财产侵权债权的基础上,应做以下受偿顺位安排:破产费用和公益债务之外,人身侵权债权——工资债权和社会保险费用——劳动补偿金债权——财产侵权债权——国家税收——一般交易债权。人身侵权债权甚至有可能优先于担保债权,如果担保债权的设立发生于人身侵权债权产生之后。社会强制责任保险费用债权视其保障范围可以先于人身侵权债权或财产侵权债权。
【Abstract】 It is reasonable that a tort claim separates from the general unsecured credit of bankruptcy and has priority over a consensual credit in the bankruptcy distribution, which is determined by the principle of justice in the bankruptcy law and the character of the involuntariness of tort creditors. Base on the categorizing of tort claims and a theory of justice created by John Rawls – giving the most benefits to the lest beneficiary, tort claims would be separated into the physical tort claim and the property tort claim, and be liquidated, after the costs for bankruptcy proceeding and community liabilities being repaid in priority, according to the following distribution sequence proposal: the physical tort claim-the salary claim and the social insurance premiums-the labor compensation claim-the property tort claim – the tax fee – the unsecured consensual credit. The physical tort claim even may be prior to the secured claims if it occurred before the secured debt being engaged. Social compulsory liability insurance premiums may have precedence over the physical tort claim or the property tort claim which is decided by the scope it covers.
【关键词】 公平的正义； 类型化； 优先受偿顺位； 人身侵权债权； 财产侵权债权；
【Key words】 The theory of justice； categorization； priority sequence； the physical tort claim； the property tort claim；
日期：2012-7-24 14:50:52 | 关闭 | 分享到：