µ±Ç°Î»Ö㺷¨ÂÉͼÊé¹Ý>>·¨Öζ¯Ì¬>>ÆÚ¿¯Ä¿Â¼>>¡¶ºÓ±±·¨Ñ§¡·2012ÄêµÚÁùÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª
¡¶ºÓ±±·¨Ñ§¡·2012ÄêµÚÁùÆÚĿ¼ÓëÕªÒª
http://www.cnhottime.cn¡¡ 2012-7-26 14:34:14¡¡ À´Ô´£ºÖйú·¨Ñ§»áÍø
1¡¢ÎÒ¹ú½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹Àí²ÆÒµÎñµÄ·¨ÂÉÀ§¾³Óë̽Ë÷¹ù½É½£¨ÖÐÑë²Æ¾´óѧ½ðÈÚѧԺ£©;Àî´óÇ죨±±¾©´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£©¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÔÚÎÒ¹ú¾¼Ã¿ìËÙ·¢Õ¹¡¢¹úÃñÊÕÈë²»¶ÏÌá¸ß¡¢Àí²ÆÐèÇóÔö¼ÓµÄ±³¾°ÏÂ,Àí²ÆÒµÎñ¿ªÊ¼Èç»ðÈçݱµØ½øÐÐ,µ«Í¬Ê±ÔÚ½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹ºÍ¿Í»§Ö®¼äÒý·¢Á˸÷ÖÖ¸÷ÑùµÄ·¨ÂɾÀ·×¡£ÓÈÆäÊǶÔÀí²Æ»î¶¯ÊôÐԺͷ¨ÂɹØÏµ,ÔÚѧ½çºÍʵÎñ½çÒýÆðÁ˹㷺ÕùÂÛ¡£ÁíÍâ,Àí²ÆÒµÎñÖÐË«·½µ±ÊÂÈËȨÀûºÍÒåÎñ²»Çå,Àí²ÆÒµÎñ¿çÒµ¾ÓªµÄ·¨Âɿհ׺ͽ»¼¯,±£µ×³ÐŵÄÜ·ñÍ»ÆÆ,¼à¹Ü»úÖÆÈ±Ê§Ò²ÊǼ±Ðè½â¾öµÄÎÊÌâ¡£ÔÚÎÒ¹ú½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹Àí²ÆÒµÎñ·¨¹æµÄ̽Ë÷ÖÐ,ÐèҪעÒâÔÚ»ìÒµ¾ÓªÇ÷ÊÆÏÂ,²ÉȡͳһÁ¢·¨ÐÎʽ,Ã÷È·Àí²ÆÒµÎñ·¨ÂÉÊôÐÔ,½¨Á¢·À·¶ÀûÒæÊäËÍ»úÖÆµÄÏà¹ØÖÆ¶È¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Financing business develops rapidly with increasement of national income and financing demand,while all kinds of legal dispute were involved . One of them is about legal attribute of financing business , which gave rise to intense repercussions and widespread debates in an academia and practical circle. The second problem is that vagueness in law can lead to indeterminacies in legal rights and obligations. There are many problems such as mixed operation unavoidably,keeping the promises and the lack of regulation. Using information ,this paper makes the detailed analysis. The conclusion shows that on the other hand there should be a clear and definite law attribut on financing business ,on the other hand a series of system should also be setup.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹£»
Àí²ÆÊôÐÔ£»
Àí²ÆÁ¢·¨£»
Àí²Æ¼à¹Ü£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
financial institution£»
attribute of financing business£»
legislation of financing business£»
regulation of financing business£»
2¡¢ÔÚ·¨Öη½ÂÔÏÂѰÇóÉç»á¹ÜÀí´´ÐÂФ±±¸ý £¨ºþÄÏʦ·¶´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Éç»á¹ÜÀí´´ÐÂÊÇÎÒ¹úÉç»á½¨ÉèÊÂÒµÍÆ½ø¹ý³ÌÖлØÓ¦Ïֽ׶ξ¼ÃÕþÖÎÉç»á·¢Õ¹µÄ±ØÈ»ÒªÇó¡£ÔÚ·¨Öη½Ãæ³ÉΪ¹ú¼Ò¸ù±¾Öιú·½ÂԵĵ±´ú,ÔÚ·¨Öη½ÂÔÏÂѰÇóÉç»á¹ÜÀí´´Ð¾ßÓÐÏÖʵÕýµ±ÐÔºÍÓÅÔ½ÐÔ;ÒÀ·¨ÊʶÈÅàÖ²Éç»á×éÖ¯ºÍ¹æ·¶Òýµ¼Éç»á×éÖ¯·¢Õ¹¡¢ÔÚÁ¢·¨Ä£Ê½ÉϸĹýÈ¥µÄÐÐÕþÖ÷µ¼Á¢·¨Îª²©ÞÄÁ¢·¨¡¢ÍêÉÆË°ÊÕ·¨ÖÆ¡¢Á¢·¨Öиü¶àµØÎüÊÕÉç»áÉú»îÖÐÐγɵÄϰ¹ßºÍ¹ßÀý¡¢¹¹½¨Õþ¸®ÓëÉç»á·Ö¹¤ºÏ×÷¸÷˾ÆäÖ°µÄÊÊ·¨¸ñ¾ÖµÈÊÇ·¨Öη½ÂÔÏÂѰÇóÉç»á¹ÜÀí´´Ðµĸù±¾ÐÔ¾Ù´ë¡£Éç»á¹ÜÀí·¨Öλ¯ÊÇÈËÀàÉç»á·¢Õ¹ºÍ·¨Öη¢Õ¹Ö®Âß¼±ØÈ»¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ During the proceeding of Chinese social construction, the innovation of social management is an indispensable requirement in response to the current economic,political and social development. The rule by law has already become the fundamental statecraft of nowadays¡¯ China,therefore the pursuit of social management innovation is endowed with real legitimacy and incomparable superiority. In order to realize the social management innovation,we are supposed to take certain fundamental initiatives,such as to cultivate and develop social organizations under law moderately,to change from the past executiveled legislation mode to the game legislation mode,to perfect the tax legal system,to admit more habits and conventions formed in the social life by legislation,and to build the framework of labor division between the government and the society. Consequently,social management by law is the inevitable logical result of development of human society and the rule by law.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Éç»á¹ÜÀí´´Ð£»
Éç»á½¨É裻
·¨ÖΣ»
Õýµ±ÐÔ£»
Éç»á×éÖ¯£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
innovation of social management£»
social construction£»
the rule by law£»
legitimacy£»
society organizations£»
3¡¢Ò½ÁƲúÆ·Ëðº¦ÔðÈÎÈýÂÛÑîÁ¢Ð £¨ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧÃñÉÌÊ·¨ÂÉ¿ÆÑ§Ñо¿ÖÐÐÄ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ò½ÁƲúÆ·Ëðº¦ÔðÈÎÊÇ¡¶ÇÖȨÔðÈη¨¡·µÚ59Ìõ¹æ¶¨µÄÒ½ÁÆËðº¦ÔðÈÎÀàÐÍ,¹ØÓÚÔðÈηֵ£µÄ¹æÔò¹æ¶¨µÃ²»¹»ÍêÉÆ,Ó¦µ±¸ù¾Ý²úÆ·ÔðÈεÄÒ»°ã¹æÔòÒÔ¼°ÇÖȨÔðÈ稵ÄÁ¬´øÔðÈιæÔò½øÐв¹³ä¡£ÑªÒºÊôÓÚ×¼²úÆ·,Ó¦µ±ÊÊÓÃÒ½ÁƲúÆ·Ëðº¦ÔðÈιæÔòÈ·¶¨Ò½ÁÆ»ú¹¹µÄÅâ³¥ÔðÈΡ£Ïû¶¾Ò©¼Á¹¹³ÉÒ½ÁƲúÆ·Ëðº¦ÔðÈÎ,ÆäȱÏݵÄÅж¨ÓÐÒ»¶¨Ìص㡣
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Liability for damages caused by medical products is one of the liability for medical damages ruled by Article 59 of Law of Tort Liability. However,the rules about the burden of liability are not perfect, which should be supplemented according to the general rules of product liability and the joint liability of Law of Tort Liability. Blood is quasi product. Medical institution should burden the liability caused by blood according to the rule of liability for damages caused by medical products. The disinfectant can cause the liability for medical damages. But its defect definition has its own characteristics.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Ò½ÁƲúÆ·Ëðº¦ÔðÈΣ»
²»ÕæÕýÁ¬´øÔðÈΣ»
Á¬´øÔðÈΣ»
ѪҺ£»
Ïû¶¾Ò©¼Á£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
liability for damages caused by medical products£»
nontypical joint liability£»
joint liability£»
blood£»
disin- fectant£»
4¡¢»ù±¾Å©Ìï±£»¤µÄ·¨ÖÆÌ½ÌÖËβŷ¢ £¨ÖÐÑëÃñ×å´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¹ú¼Ò×ÅÁ¦ÊµÊ©»ù±¾Å©Ìï±£»¤ÖƶÈ,±£×¡»ù±¾Å©Ìï¾Í±£×¡ÁËÎÒ¹ú¸ûµØµÄ¾«»ª,±ØÐë¶Ô»ù±¾Å©ÌïÒÀ·¨ÊµÊ©ÑϸñµÄ¼à¶½¹ÜÀí,È·¶¨»ù±¾Å©ÌïÖÊÁ¿ÒÀ¾ÝºÍ¿¼ºË±ê×¼¡£±ØÐë×ÅÁ¦¹¹½¨ºÍ»®¶¨ÓÀ¾ÃÐÔ»ù±¾Å©Ìï,ºÝ×¥»ù±¾Å©ÌïË®ÀûÉèÊ©½¨Éè,É»ù±¾Å©ÌïÍÁÈÀ¸ÄÁ¼,ÍÆ½ø»ù±¾Å©Ìï»úе»¯¸û×÷,¼ÓÇ¿»ù±¾Å©ÌïÉú̬»·¾³½¨Éè,Ç¿»¯»ù±¾Å©Ìï¿Æ¼¼Ñз¢ºÍÓ¦ÓÃ,Âäʵ»ù±¾Å©ÌïÅ©²úÆ·ÖÊÁ¿°²È«±ê×¼¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ G overnm ent m akes every effort to im plem ent the basic farm land protection system ,which keeps the essence of the basic farm land. It is necessary to im plem ent strict supervision according to law,to determ ine the quality and appraisal standards of basic farm land. W e m ust construct and delim it perm anentbasic farm land,constructthe water conservancy facilities ofbasic farm land,deepen the soil im provem entof basic farm land,and prom ote the m echanized farm ing of basic farm land,strengthen ecological environm ent construction of basic farm land,strengthen the technology developm ent and application basic farm land ofbasic farm land,carry outthe produce quality safety standard ofbasic farm - land.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
»ù±¾Å©Ì
ÖÊÁ¿ÒÀ¾Ý£»
¿¼ºË±ê×¼£»
±£»¤Öƶȣ»
¡¾Key words¡¿
the basic farm land£»
quality basis£»
appraisalstandards£»
protection system£»
5¡¢ÊÂʵ´ó»¹ÊÇ·¨¹Ù´ó?¡ª¡ªÂÛÖ¤¾ÝÅųý¹æÔòÅá²ÔÁä £¨Î÷±±Õþ·¨´óѧ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ö¤¾ÝÊÇÈÏʶµÄ»ù´¡¡¢Ö¤Ã÷µÄ¸ù¾Ý¡¢¼ìÑéµÄ±ê×¼¡¢Ë¼ÏëµÄÖ¸ÄÏ¡£Ê²Ã´Äܵ±´ËÖØÈÎ?ΩÓÐÊÂʵ¡£Ö¤¾ÝÊÇÊÂʵ,ÊÂʵ²»´æÔÚ·Ç·¨¡¢ºÏ·¨µÄÎÊÌâ¡£ÊÂʵÊǿ͹۵Ä,¼È²»ÊÜ·¨Âɵ÷Õû,Ò²²»ÊÜ·¨ÂÉÖÆÔ¼,Òò¶øÖ¤¾ÝҲûÓкϷ¨ÐÔ¡£Ö¤¾Ý²»ÄÜÅųý¡£ÅųýÖ¤¾ÝµÄʵÖÊÊÇ·¨¹ÙÕö×ÅÑÛ¾¦²»ÈÏÊÂʵ,ÅųýÖ¤¾ÝµÄ·¨¹Ù°Ñ×Ô¼ººÍÊÂʵµÄλÖðڴíÁË,ÕâÊÇÒ»Ïî¸ù±¾ÐԵĴíÎó¡£·Ç·¨»ñÈ¡ÈËÖ¤ÊÇ˾·¨¾¯²ìͨ¹ýÐÌѶ±Æ¹©ºÍÖ¸ÃûÎʹ©ÕâÑùÁ½ÖØ×ïÐÐʵÏÖµÄ,Òò¶øËü²»ÊdzÌÐò,¶øÊdzÌÐòÖеÄʵÌå¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Evidance is the basis for cognition and testification,the standard of inspection,and the guide of thinking. Whatcan becom e a burden?O nly the facts. Prooves are facts,while there are no legal or illegalquestions for facts as facts are objective,neither subject to legal regulation nor subject to legal constraints. Therefore,there are no legal questions for prooves. Nor can prooves be ruled out. If a judge would exclude any evidance,it merely means the judge had shut his eyes up before the facts. Such a judge had misplaced prooves and him self,which is a big mistake. Illegally obtaining witness is realized eigherthrough torturing the suspectto extractconfessions orthrough asking fora crime by name for such crimes by the police. O bviously,both conducts are illegitimate. So illegally obtaining witness is the substance ofa procedure rahter than the procedure itself.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Ö¤¾Ý£»
Åųý£»
ÐÌѶ±Æ¹©£»
Ö¸ÃûÎʹ©£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
evidance£»
exclude£»
torturing the suspectto extractconfessions£»
asking for a crime by name£»
6¡¢±ÜÃâË«ÖØÕ÷˰ж¨ÊÊÓÃÖÐӦעÒâµÄ¼¸¸öÎÊÌâÕÔѧÇå;Å·ÈØÈØ £¨Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ëæ×ÅÎÒ¹ú¶ÔÍâ¾¼ÃÁªÏµ½øÒ»²½¼ÓÇ¿,ÊÕÈëÓëÄÉ˰È˵Ĺú¼Ê»¯Ç÷ÊÆÍ¹ÏÔ,ÈçºÎ±ÜÃâºÍ¼õÉÙË«ÖØÕ÷˰¾ßÓоÙ×ãÇáÖØµÄ×÷ÓÃ,ͬʱ,˰ÊÕж¨ÔÚÏû³ý¹ú¼Ò¼äË«ÖØÕ÷˰±ÚÀÝÖÐ,·¢»Ó×ÅÔ½À´Ô½´óµÄ×÷Ó᣶ԱÜÃâË«ÖØÕ÷˰ж¨ÊÊÓõÄÌØÊâÐÔ½øÐзÖÎö,Ìá³ö¸ù¾ÝÏà¹Ø³åÍ»·¨ÔÀíºÍ¹æÔò´¦ÀíË«ÖØÕ÷˰ËùÉæ¼°µÄÈô¸ÉÎÊÌâµÄ·¾¶ºÍ·½·¨¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ With the further strengthening of China¡¯s foreign economics,the international trend of incom e and the taxpayer¡¯s highlights,and how to avoid and reduce double taxation plays a pivotal role. This article analyzes the specialnature of the application of avoidance of double taxation agreem ents and gives the relevantprinciples and the processing path for a number of issues involved in the double taxation in accordance with the rules ofconflictoflaws.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
˰ÊÕ¹ÜϽȨ£»
±ÜÃâË«ÖØÕ÷˰£»
³åÍ»£»
·¨ÂÉÊÊÓã»
¡¾Key words¡¿
tax jurisdiction£»
avoid double taxation£»
conflict£»
law application£»
7¡¢ÃÀ¹ú¼ì²ì»ú¹ØÍ¥Éó½×¶ÎְȨdzÎöÕźèΡ £¨¹ãÎ÷´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÃÀ¹ú¼ì²ì¹ÙÔÚÍ¥Éó½×¶ÎÏíÓнÏΪ¹ã·ºµÄְȨ,º¸Ç³öÍ¥Ö§³Ö¹«ËßȨ¡¢ÌôÑ¡ÅãÉóԱȨ¡¢·¨Í¥±çÂÛȨ¼°¶ÔÅãÉóÍÅָʾµÄ¼ì²ì½¨ÒéȨµÈµÈ¡£ÆäÖÐ,¼ì²ì¹ÙÔÚÍ¥Éó½×¶ÎµÄ·¨Í¥±çÂÛȨ,´óÌåÉÏÓÖ¿É·ÖΪ¿ªÍ¥³ÂÊöȨ¡¢Õ¹Ê¾Ö¤¾ÝȨ¡¢½»²æÑ¯ÎÊȨÓë½á°¸³Â´ÊȨµÈµÈ¡£´ËÍâ,¼ì²ì¹ÙÔÚ·¨¹ÙÏòÅãÉóÍÅ×÷³öָʾǰ,Òà¿ÉÌá³öÏàÓ¦¼ì²ì½¨Òé¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ At the trialphases,the American prosecutors usually exercise wide range of authorities,including the rights to supportprosecution in court,selectjurors,debate and provide advice to jury instructions and so forth. Among them ,as forthe rights to debate,itincludes the rights to startwith opening statem ent, reveal rebuttal evidence,conduct cross-exam ination and conclude with closing argum ent,etc. In addition,prosecutors could also provide his advices to judge before jury instructions.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ÃÀ¹ú¼ì²ì»ú¹Ø£»
³öÍ¥Ö§³Ö¹«ËßȨ£»
ÌôÑ¡ÅãÉóԱȨ£»
·¨Í¥±çÂÛȨ£»
¶ÔÅãÉóÍÅָʾµÄ¼ì²ì½¨ÒéȨ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
Am erican prosecutor¡¯s office£»
right to support prosecution in court£»
right to select jurors£»
right to debate£»
rightto provide the advice to jury instructions£»
8¡¢ÂÛ¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñ¸ÅÄî֮ȷÁ¢Óë·¢Õ¹½¯Òø»ª £¨¹ãÖÝ´óѧ¼ì²ìÀíÂÛÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¶Ô¹ú¼Ò¡¢ÈËȨ˼Ïë±äǨµÄ»ù±¾Ê·ÊµÓë˼ÏëÊ·½øÐмòÒªÊáÀí,ÂÛÊö¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñÊǹú¼ÒÆðÔ´µÄÂÏÉúÎï,¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñÊÇʵÏÖ¹ú¼ÒÄ¿µÄµÄÓÐЧ;¾¶,·²ÈËȨËùÔÚÖ®´¦,¼´Îª¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñ²¢ÐÐ֮ʱ,Ïà¹ØÖÆ¶ÈÉè¼ÆÎª¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñµÄÈ·Á¢ÌṩÁË¿ÉÐÐÐÔ·½°¸,·¢ÏÖ¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñÐγÉÓÚ¡¶´óÏÜÕ¡·Ê±ÆÚ,È·Á¢ÓÚ17ÊÀ¼ÍÓ¢¹ú×ʲú½×¼¶¸ïÃüʱÆÚÒÔ¼°²ûÊöÆäÔÚ½üµ±´úµÄ·¢Õ¹±äǨ,²¢½øÒ»²½×ܽá³ö¹ú¼Ò¸ºÓÐÈËȨ±£ÕÏÒåÎñÊôÓ¦ÓÐÖ®Òå¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ This paper,while presenting a brief review on the evolution of the theory of nation and hum an rights, referring to the basic historical facts and intellectual history,argues that nations¡¯obligations grow synchronically with the origin of it,that nations¡¯obligation is an effective m eans of achieving nations¡¯ goals,that hum an rights go side by side with nations¡¯obligations and that the designing of relevant system s provides a feasible fram ework for the establishm ent of nations¡¯obligations. This paper also reveals the developm entofthe conceptofnations¡¯obligations from its presence in The GreatChart,to its establishm entin British capitalism revolution era and the latest developm ents in contem porary society. The author further concludes that inherently,a nation bears the responsibility of safeguarding hum an rights.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
¹ú¼ÒÄ¿µÄ£»
ÈËȨ±£ÕÏ£»
¹ú¼ÒÒåÎñ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
nation¡¯s goals£»
safeguarding ofhum an rights£»
nation¡¯s obligations£»
9¡¢Éç»á±£ÕÏÖ÷ÌåÒåÎñ·Öµ£»úÖÆÑо¿¡ª¡ªÒÔÕþ¸®ÂÄÐÐÉç»á±£ÕÏÒåÎñΪÊÓ½ÇÑîÊçϼ £¨¹ãÖÝ´óѧ¼ì²ìÀíÂÛÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ 2011Äê7ÔÂ1ÈÕÉúЧµÄ¡¶ÖлªÈËÃñ¹²ºÍ¹úÉç»á±£ÏÕ·¨¡·,ÒÔ·¨ÂÉÐÎʽȷÁ¢ÁËÎÒ¹ú"Õþ¸®Ö÷µ¼ÐÍ"µÄÉç»á±£ÕÏģʽ¡£ÀúÊ·ºÍÏÖʵÕÑʾ:¸÷¼¶Õþ¸®ÂÄÐÐÉç»á±£ÕÏÒåÎñµÄÓÅÁÓ,Ö±½ÓÓ°Ï칫Ãñ¸÷ÏîÉç»á±£ÏÕȨÀûµÄʵÏÖ,¹ØÏµÉç»áµÄºÍгÎȶ¨¡£¹á³¹ÊµÊ©¡¶Éç»á±£ÏÕ·¨¡·,Ó¦Õë¶ÔÕþ¸®ÂÄÐÐÉç±£ÒåÎñ´æÔÚµÄÎÊÌâ,¸ù¾Ý²»Í¬Éç±£ÏîÄ¿µÄÌØµã,È·¶¨ÖÐÑëºÍµØ·½Õþ¸®·Öµ£Éç»á±£ÕÏÒåÎñµÄ»úÖÆ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The Social Insurance Law ofthe People¡¯s Republic of China,which came into effectin 1stJuly,2011, establishes a "leading by the governm ent"style society security. The history and the present tell that, the grade of how the society security obligation is perform ed by alllevels ofgovernm ents directly infects on the fulfillment of allkinds of citizens¡¯social insurance rights and concerns the harm ony and stability of the society. The implem entation ofSocialInsurance Law of the People¡¯s Republic of China,should be directed against the existing problem s of governm ents¡¯perform ance in fulfilling the society security obligations,and should be according to the characters ofdifferentitem s of society security,establish a obligation sharing mechanism between centralgovernm entand localgovernm ents as well.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Éç»á±£ÕÏȨ£»
ÂÄÐÐȱʧ£»
ÒåÎñ·Öµ£»úÖÆ£»
¼à¹ÜÔðÈΣ»
¡¾Key words¡¿
the right of society security£»
perform ance defect£»
obligation sharing mechanism£»
duty of scrutiny£»
10¡¢³ÛÃûÉ̱걣»¤µÄÒ컯ÓëÀíÐԻعéÎÂÑ¿Ç壨ºÓ±±¾Ã³´óѧ¾¼Ã¹ÜÀíѧԺ£©;ÄÏÕñÐË £¨Ê¯¼Òׯ¾¼ÃѧԺ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ³ÛÃûÉ̱걣»¤µÄ¼ÛֵĿ±ê,ËæÆä±£»¤·¶Î§ºÍ±£»¤±ê×¼µÄÑݽø,Àú¾ÁËÏû·ÑÕßÖÐÐÄÖ÷ÒåºÍÉ̱êȨÈËÖÐÐÄÖ÷Òå,µ«ÖÁÉÆÖÁÃÀµÄ¼ÛֵĿ±êÓ¦ÊÇÉ̱ê˽ȨÓëÉç»á¹«¹²ÀûÒæµÄ¾«Ãî¾ùºâÓëºÍг¡£ÎÒ¹ú³ÛÃûÉ̱걣»¤¹ý¶È¹Ø»³É̱êȨ¶øºöÊÓÉç»á¹«¹²ÀûÒæ,´Ó¶øµ¼ÖÂÁËÊÀËùº±¼ûµÄÈ϶¨Ò컯¡ªÁ¢·¨Ò컯¡ªË¾·¨Ò컯µÄ½øÂ·,È϶¨·½Ê½Ò컯ΪÖ÷¶¯¡¢ÅúÁ¿¡¢¼¯ÖÐÈ϶¨,È϶¨Ð§Á¦Ò컯ΪȫÓò³¤ÆÚÓÐЧ,È϶¨±ê×¼Ò컯ΪºÃÉùÓþ¡¢¸ßÖÊÁ¿¡¢´óÏúÁ¿,±£»¤·¶Î§Ò컯ΪȫÀàһͳ±£»¤¡£Òª³¹µ×ʵÏÖÎÒ¹ú³ÛÃûÉ̱걣»¤µÄÀíÐԻعé,±ØÐëÉîÖ²Æä¼ÛֵĿ±êÖ®"¸ù",ÅàÓýÆä¼ÛÖµÀíÄîÖ®"ÍÁ";ÖØËÜÆäʺóÖÕ¼«¾È¼ÃÐÔ¡¢±»¶¯¡¢¸ö°¸È϶¨µÄ¼´Ê±ÓÐЧÐÔµÄÔËÐлúÖÆ;½¨Á¢³ÛÃûÉ̱귴µ»¯ÖƶÈ;ÓÅ»¯ÖƶȻ·¾³,¹æÖÆÈ϶¨×ÔÓɲÃÁ¿;¹æ·¶ÆóÒµ¶Ô³ÛÃûÉ̱êµÄʹÓá£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ With the evolution of scope and standard of famous tradem ark¡¯s protection,the value target of famous tradem ark has experienced the change from consumer-centered to rightholder-centered. Butthe perfect value targetoftradem ark should be the exquisite and delicate balance and harm ony between private right and social public interest. The protection of fam ous tradem ark in China has been given excessive concern to tradem ark rightrather than socialpublic interestwhich had led to a scarce way ofevolution: recognizing alienation-legislative alienation-judicial alienation. The alienation of recognizing method appears to be initiative,batch and centralized;the effectiveness of recognizing has become countryround and long term ;the standard ofrecognizing has aliened to be good credit,high quality and large sum ofselling and the scope of protection has extended to the whole category of the com modities. To realize the rational regression of the protection of famous tradem ark in China,we should plant the "root"of its value target and foster the "soil"of its value idea;reconstruct the mechanism of its afterward remedy,passive and individualrecognition as wellas timely and effective running mechanism . Meanwhile,we should also establish the anti-dilution system of famous trademark,optimize the environment of system ,regulate and recognize discretionary of trademark and standardize the use of famous trademark.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
³ÛÃûÉ̱ꣻ
ÖÆ¶ÈÒ컯£»
¼ÛֵĿ±ê£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
famous trademark£»
alienation ofsystem£»
value target£»
11¡¢Õ¼ÓÐÔÚÏÖ´ú²Æ²úÖÆ¶ÈÖеĵØÎ»ÉêÃ÷¡ª¡ª¡ªÒ»ÖÖ»ùÓÚ¶¯Ì¬³åÍ»µÄ¿¼²ì¼¾¾³ £¨Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧӦÓ÷¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Õ¼ÓÐÒòÆä¶ÀÕ¼ÐÔ¡¢ÅÅËûÐÔÒÔ¼°ÔÚ¶¯²úÉÏËù¶À¾ßµÄȨÀûÍâ¹ÛЧÁ¦,µ¼ÖÂÆä¸ºÔØÈ¨ÀûÓëµÚÈýÈËÀûÒæµÄ³åÍ»,³ÉΪÎïȨ·¨µ÷Õû¿Í¹Û¹«ÕýÓë½»Ò×°²È«µÄ¹Ø¼üÖÆ¶È¡£ÔÚ¶ÔÕ¼ÓÐÐÔÖÊÖØÐ¶¨Î»µÄǰÌáÏÂ,ͨ¹ý¶Ô²Æ²úÖÆ¶ÈÖÐÕ¼ÓйØÏµµÄ¼ìË÷,¿ÉÔÚ½»Ò׸÷·½Ö÷ÌåµÄÀûÒæ³åÍ»¹ØÏµÖжÔÕ¼ÓиÅÄî½øÐÐÀíÐԵIJûÊÍ¡£Í¨¹ý¶Ô´ËÀàÕ¼ÓйØÏµµÄÆÊÎö,²¢Í¨¹ý¶ÔÕ¼ÓеÄÐÔÖÊ¡ª¡ª¡ª·¨ÒæµÄ½øÒ»²½³éÏó,¿ÉÒÔÀåÇåÕ¼ÓÐÖз¨ÒæÔڲƲúÖÆ¶ÈÖеľßÌå·¨ÂɼÛÖµ¡£ÆäÌåÏÖΪ±¾È¨µÄ³åÍ»ÉÏÊôÅÅËûÐÔ³åÍ»,±£»¤·½·¨ÉÏΪ·Ç´Ë¼´±Ë:»ò±£»¤È¨Àû»ò±£»¤µÚÈýÈËÀûÒæ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Possession has traits of monopolistic,exclusive and representing the right of personal property. These features led to the confliction with third party rights. Possession becom es a key legal system relating justice and transaction security in property law. From a new perspective,we can have a rational explanation aboutthe conflictions between differentparties. With this perspective,we can have deeper understanding of the legal value of possession. At the end,we can choose to protect the rights represented by possession or to protectthird party rights.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Õ¼ÓУ»
ÀûÒæºâƽ£»
·¨Ò棻
½»Ò×°²È«£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
possession£»
equitable share of benefits£»
legalinterests£»
transaction security£»
12¡¢ÃñÉÌ·¨ÔÚÖйú¹Å´ú·¨ÖеĵØÎ»ºÍ·¢Õ¹Àú³ÌÍõÈ𠣨±±·½¹¤Òµ´óѧÎÄ·¨Ñ§Ôº·¨ÂÉϵ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Öйú¹Å´ú´æÔڹ淶ÒâÒåÉϵÄÃñÉÌ·¨,Öйú¹Å´úÃñÉÌ·¨ÊÇÔÚÒÔÐÌΪÖ÷¡¢Öî·¨ºÏÌåµÄ·â½¨±£ÊØ·¨ÂÉÌåϵÖеÃÒÔ´æÔںͷ¢Õ¹µÄ,ÆäÔÚÖйú¹Å´ú·¨ÂÉÌåϵÖÐÒ»Ö±´¦ÓÚ´ÓÊôÓë´ÎÒªµÄµØÎ»,ÃñÉÌ·¨µäʼÖÕûÓдÓÐÌ·¨µäÖжÀÁ¢³öÀ´,²¢ÇÒ,Ãñ·¨ÓëÉÌ·¨¹æ·¶Ò²ÊDz»¼ÓÇø·ÖµØ»ìÔÚÒ»Æð¡£Öйú¹Å´úÃñÉÌ·¨Âɹ淶¾ÀúÁËÒ»¸ö´ÓÉÙµ½¶à,´Ó¼òµ¥µ½¸´ÔÓ,´ÓÃñÐ̲»·Öµ½ÃñÐÌÓзÖ,´ÓÏà¶Ô·ÖÉ¢µ½Ïà¶Ô¼¯Öеķ¢Õ¹Àú³Ì¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ In ancientChina,there were civiland commerciallaw provisions although there were no civilcode and commercialcode. The civiland com m erciallaw provisions were hidden in the crim inal code,and they were in a subordinate position. The civil code and commercial code were never independent from the crim inalcode in ancientChina. Butthe civiland commercial law provisions passed a way from less to more,from simple to complex.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ÃñÉÌ·¨£»
Öйú¹Å´ú·¨£»
Ñݽø£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
civiland commerciallaw£»
the law ofancientChina£»
evolution£»
13¡¢ÂÛ·¸×ï¹ÊÒâ³Ì¶ÈµÄ»®·Ö¼°Æä·¨ÂɼÛÖµÖì¿¡Ç¿ £¨¹ãÖÝ´óѧ¼ì²ìÀíÂÛÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ·¸×ï¹ÊÒâ²»½öÓÐÀàÐÍÖ®·Ö,¶øÇÒÓг̶ÈÖ®·Ö;ÎÒ¹úÐÌ·¨Ñ§½ç¶Ô´Ëȱ·¦Ì½ÌÖ,²»ÀûÓÚ´ËÁìÓòÑо¿µÄÉîÈë·¢Õ¹¡£¹úÍâͬÈʵÄ̽ÌÖ,ËäÈ»¸øÁËÎÒÃÇһЩÆôʾ,µ«ÈÔÓÐʧƫÆÄ¡£ÒÀ¾Ý¹ÊÒâÐÄÀí̬¶ÈÐγɹý³ÌÖеÄ×Ô¾õÐÔ/¶ÀÁ¢ÐÔ×´¿ö,·¸×ï¹ÊÒâ³Ì¶È¿É»®·ÖΪÖ÷¶¯¹ÊÒâ¡¢±»¶¯¹ÊÒâºÍ±»ÆÈ¹ÊÒâÈý¸ö³Ì¶ÈµÝ¼õµÄ²ã´Î,ÕâÖÖ»®·Ö¾ßÓÐÖØÒªµÄ˾·¨¼ÛÖµºÍÁ¢·¨¼ÛÖµ,ÌåÏÖÁË×ïÔðÐÌÏàͳһµÄ·¨Öξ«Éñ,ÓÐÀûÓÚÖÆÔ¼·¨¹ÙµÄ×ÔÓɲÃÁ¿È¨,ÓÐÀûÓÚ¶ÔÎÒ¹úÐÌ·¨Ïà¹Ø¹æ¶¨µÄÀíÂÛ̽ÌÖ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Criminal intention may be classified into different types according to the degree of the intention. Inadequate research ofthis problem in the crim inalacademy of China is unfavorable forthe further study in this field. Researches and studies ofthe foreign experts,which may offerus some enlightenm ent,are stillbiased. According to the consciousness or independence constituted in the process of intentionally psychological attitude,crim inal intention degree may be degressively divided into active intention, passive intention and forced intention. Division in this way indicates im portant judicial value and legislative value,and em bodies the legal consistency of crimes and crim inal liabilities. It helps to restrictthe judges¡¯discretion and facilitate the theoretical discussion of the relevant provisions of the Chinese crim inallaw.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
·¸×ï¹ÊÒ⣻
ÀàÐÍ£»
³Ì¶È£»
×Ô¾õÐÔ£»
¶ÀÁ¢ÐÔ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
crim inalintention£»
types£»
degree£»
consciousness£»
independence£»
14¡¢ÎÒ¹ú×ÔÏ´Ç®ÐÐΪ²»¶ÀÁ¢³É×ïµÄÔÒò·ÖÎöÒ¦±ø £¨±±¾©ÊÐÉç¿ÆÔºÊ×¶¼×ÛÖÎÑо¿Ëù£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ´ÓÀíÂÛÉϽ²,´«Í³µÄÐÐΪÀíÂÛºÍÇ£Á¬·¸ÀíÂÛ²»Ö§³Öµ¥¶À×·Ëß×ÔÏ´Ç®ÐÐΪ;´ÓÁ¢·¨ÉÏ˵,ÐÌ·¨¶¨ÐÔ+¶¨Á¿µÄ·¸×ïÉèÁ¢±ê×¼¡¢ÉÏÓη¸×ïµÄÖØÐÌÅäÖú͹ú¼ÊÉ϶Ե¥¶À×·¾¿×ÔÏ´Ç®ÐÐΪµÄ·ÇÇ¿ÖÆÐÔÒªÇóʹÖйúÐÌ·¨ÎÞÐëµ¥¶À×·¾¿×ÔÏ´Ç®ÐÐΪ;¾Í˾·¨¶øÑÔ,ʵ¼ùÖÐÄܹ»Í¨¹ý½«×ÔÏ´Ç®ÆÀ¼ÛΪÌá¸ß·¨¶¨Ð̵µ´Î»ò´ÓÖØ´¦·£µÄ"Çé½Ú"À´ÊµÏÖ×ïÐ̾ùºâʹ×ÔÏ´Ç®ÐÐΪ¶ÀÁ¢³É×ïȱ·¦Êµ¼ù¶¯Á¦¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ In theory,the traditionalbehavior theory and implicated theory don¡¯tsupporta separate prosecution for money laundering;In legislation,the reasons why self-money laundering dose not constitute a crime independently include the standard of qualitative and quantitative,the heavy penalty of predicate offenses and the non-m andatory requirem ents of international provision;In adm inistration of justice, there is little power m ake self-money laundering to constitute a crime independently because it can be evaluated the plotwhich im prove the grade of legal punishm ent or be punished severely to achieve the balance of crime and punishm entin practice.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Ï´Ç®·¸×
×ÔÏ´Ç®£»
²»¶ÀÁ¢³É×
¡¾Key words¡¿
money laundering crim e£»
self-money laundering£»
notconstitute a crime independently£»
15¡¢Î£ÏÕ¸öÈ˸ÅÄîµÄ²úÉúËÝÔ´ÂÀн¨£¨ËÕÖÝ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ΣÏÕ¸öÈ˸ÅÄî²úÉúÓÚ19ÊÀ¼ÍÖкóÆÚ¡£µ±Ê±,¹¤Òµ¾¼Ã¿ìËÙ·¢Õ¹,ÈË¿ÚѸÃÍÔö¼Ó,µ«Éç»á»·¾³¶ñ»¯,ΣÏÕ¸öÈË´óÁ¿Ó¿ÏÖ,ÑÏÖØÍþв×ÅÉç»á°²È«¡£ÕâÒ»¸ÅÄîµÄ²úÉú»¹Êܵ½ÁËʵ֤Ö÷Òå¡¢´ï¶ûÎĽø»¯ÂÛÒÔ¼°¾«Éñ²¡Ñ§µÄ·¢Õ¹µÄÓ°Ïì,¶øÇÒÓë¹ú¼Ò³Í·£È¨Á¦µÄתÐÍÃÜÇÐÏà¹Ø¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The concept of dangerous individuals stems from the late 19th century. Atthattime,industrialeconomy developed fastly and population increased rapidly,but due to social environm ental deteriorated, dangerous individuals emerged in a large am ount,it was a serious threat to social security. The generation ofthe conceptinfluenced by the developm entof the positivism ,Darwin¡¯s theory of evolution and the psychiatry,and also the transform ation ofthe state punishm entpower closely related.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ΣÏÕ¸öÈË£»
¹æÑµÈ¨Á¦£»
ʵ֤Ö÷Ò壻
½ø»¯ÂÛ£»
¾«Éñ²¡Ñ§£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
dangerous individual£»
discipline power£»
positivism£»
theory ofevolution£»
psychiatry£»
16¡¢ÂÛ¡¶Ë½ÓªÆóÒµÔÝÐÐÌõÀý¡·µÄ´æÓë·ÏÑî»ýÌà £¨±±¾©ÁªºÏ´óѧӦÓÃÎÄÀíѧԺ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¡¶Ë½ÓªÆóÒµÔÝÐÐÌõÀý¡·×Ô1988Äê°ä²¼ÊµÊ©ÒÔÀ´ÒѾ23ÄêÓÐÓà,ÆäÁ¢·¨µÄ±³¾°ºÍʵʩµÄ»·¾³ÔçÒÑ·¢ÉúÁ˸ù±¾ÐԵĸıä,¸üÖØÒªµÄÊǸÃÌõÀýµÄÏàÓ¦¹æ¶¨ºÜ¶à¶¼Òѹýʱ,ÇÒÓëÆäºó³ǫ̈µÄºÜ¶à·¨ÂÉÏàì¶Ü¡¢Ïà³åÍ»,ÓÈÆäÊÇ¡¶¹«Ë¾·¨¡·¡¢¡¶ºÏ»ïÆóÒµ·¨¡·ºÍ¡¶¸öÈ˶À×ÊÆóÒµ·¨¡·Ïà¼Ìµ¥¶ÀÁ¢·¨²¢°ä²¼Ê©Ðкó,¡¶Ë½ÓªÆóÒµÔÝÐÐÌõÀý¡·Ê§È¥ÁË´æÔڵĸù»ù¡£Òò´Ë,¼°Ê±·ÏÖ¹¡¶Ë½ÓªÆóÒµÔÝÐÐÌõÀý¡·ÊDZØÈ»µÄÑ¡Ôñ¡£ÓÈÆäÊDz»ÄÜÈÎ"ÔÝÐÐ"ÌõÀýÎÞÏÞÆÚµØÔÝÐÐÏÂÈ¥,ÒÔÈ·±£Á¢·¨µÄ¿ÆÑ§ÐÔºÍÑÏËàÐÔ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Twenty-three years has passed since Provisional Regulations of People¡¯s Republic of China on Private Enterprises was prom ulgated and implemented. Its legislative background and im plem ented environm ent have undergone the essentialchanges. M ore im portantly,m any corresponding regulations have been out of date as well as in contradiction to the laws later prom ulgated. Especially,with the Company Law, Partnership Business Law and Law of Individual Sole Investor Enterprise separately and successively prom ulgated,Provisional Regulations of People¡¯s Republic of China on Private Enterprises lost its existence foundation. Therefore,prom ptly repealing Provisional Regulations of People¡¯s Republic of China on Private Enterprises is an inevitable choice. Particularly,provisional regulations should not be exited for an infinite period,thus the scientific nature and seriousness oflegislation can be guaranteed.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
˽ӪÆóÒµ£»
ÔÝÐÐÌõÀý£»
·ÏÖ¹£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
private enterprises£»
provisionalregulations£»
repeal£»
17¡¢»·¾³²Æ²úÈ¨ÖÆ¶È¹¹½¨ÀíÂÛÑо¿´Þ½ðÐÇ £¨Î÷ÄϿƼ¼´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº/Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧ¾¼Ã·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ȨÀû»ù´¡Ñо¿ÊDz¿ÃÅ·¨ÀíÂÛ·¢Õ¹µÄԴȪ,ÒÔ»·¾³È¨ÀíÂÛÒýÁì²¢³ÐÔØ»·¾³·¨ÖƶȵÄ×ÝÉî·¢Õ¹À§ÄÑÖØÖØ¡£»·¾³²Æ²úȨ¹«·¨ÐÔ˽ȨµÄÑо¿ÊÓ½Ç,Ö±Ãæ×ÊԴʱ´úÉú̬±£»¤µÄÏÖʵÁ¢·¨ÐèÇóºÍ¸öÌåÐÔ˽Ȩ±£»¤µÄÏÜÕþ¼ÛÖµ,ÍØÕ¹»·¾³·¨Öƶȼܹ¹¿Õ¼ä,¿ªÕ¹»·¾³·¨Ó봫ͳ²¿ÃÅ·¨µÄ¶Ô»°¡£»·¾³²Æ²úȨ×ðÖØ²¢ÎüÄɹú¼Ò»·¾³Õþ²ßÓëÖÆ¶È´´ÐµÄʵ¼ù³É¹û,ÒÔ»·¾³ÀûÓúͱ£»¤ÖеIJƲúÀûÒæÎªÖÐÐÄ,̽ÇóÅÅÎÛȨ¡¢»·¾³ÈÝÁ¿Ê¹ÓÃȨ¡¢»·¾³ÀûÓÃȨ¡¢ÉúÌ¬Ð§ÒæÊÜÒæÈ¨µÈ¹ÜÖÆÐÍ»·¾³Ë½È¨·¨Àí»ù´¡ºÍÉú³¤¿Õ¼ä¡£²¢Î§ÈÆ»·¾³²Æ²úÈ¨ÖÆ¶ÈÄ¿±êµÄʵÏÖ,̽Çó»·¾³²Æ²úȨ±£»¤µÄÖÆ¶Èƽ̨ºÍ¹ú¼Ò»·¾³Öƶȴ´Ðµķ¢Õ¹·½Ïò¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Research ofbasic rights is the source of the development for the department law. Environm ental right theory has much difficulty in leading the further development of environmental law. From the perspective of public law,research of environm ental property rights could deal well with the value conflicts of the constitutionalprotection for private rights and requirem ent of ecological protection,and expand the space of institutional fram ework of environm ental law,carry out a dialogue between the traditionalbranches of law and environm ental law. The purpose of environm ental property rights is to inductthe practical institutional innovation of environm ental protection,find the common principle of the emission rights,the rights for using environm ental capacity,beneficial rights for environm ental benefits,etc,explore the nationalin stitutional innovation platform for the environm entalprotection.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
»·¾³²Æ²úȨ£»
»·¾³È¨£»
¹«·¨ÐÔ˽Ȩ£»
ÖÆ¶È´´Ð£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
environm entalproperty rights£»
environm entalrights£»
private right of public law£»
institutional innovation£»
18¡¢ÇæÖÆÓëͻΧ:·¨ÔºÊÜÀí»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϰ¸¼þ¶¯Á¦»úÖÆµÄȱÏÝÓëÖØËÜÁõ³¬ £¨»ªÇÈ´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÀíÂÛ½çºÍʵÎñ½ç¶Ô»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϵÄÑо¿ÆÕ±éºöÊÓÁË·¨Ôº/·¨¹Ù¶ÔÓÚ»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϰ¸¼þµÄÈÏÖªÓë̬¶È,µ±Ç°·¨ÔºÓë·¨¹ÙÆÕ±é¶ÔÓÚ»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϳÖÓб£ÊØÓë¾Ü¾øµÄ̬¶È,ÆäÔÒòÔÚÓÚ·¨ÔºÊÜÀí»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϰ¸¼þµÄ¶¯Á¦»úÖÆ´æÔÚȱÏÝ:·¨ÂÉÒÀ¾Ý²»×㡢רÃÅ»·¾³ËßËÏ»úÖÆÈ±Î»,·¨ÔºÅųâȺÌåÐÔËßËÏ,»·±£·¨Í¥µÄÖÆ¶ÈÍ»ÆÆÄÑÒÔ»ñµÃ·¨¹ÙȺÌåµÄ¹ã·ºÈÏͬ¡£Òò´Ë,±ØÐë´ÓÍêÉÆ»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϵķ¨ÂÉÒÀ¾Ý¡¢¹¹½¨ÏµÍ³µÄ»·¾³ËßËÏ»úÖÆÌåϵ¡¢½øÐÐרҵÅàѵºÍ»·¾³ÎÊÌâµÄÉç»á½¨¹¹µÈ¼¸¸ö·½Ã濪·¢ÓëÖØËÜ·¨ÔºÊÜÀí»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËϰ¸¼þµÄ¶¯Á¦»úÖÆ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The study oftheorists and practitioners on environm entalpublic interestlitigation is com prehensive,but they generally ignore the knowledge and attitudes of court/judge on environm ental public interest litigation. The current court and judges generally adopt a conservative attitude and refuse to environm entalpublic interestlitigation. The reason is that,when courtacceptthe environm entalpublic interestlitigation case,the dynam ic mechanism is defective. These defects include:lack oflegalbasis; the absence of specialm echanisms forenvironm entallitigation,courtrejection of mass action,judges do notagree with the system break of environm ental court. Therefore,we must com plete the dynamic mechanism of the court from the following aspects:improve the legal basis for environm ental public interest litigation,build the mechanism system of environm entallitigation,professional training,social construction ofenvironm entalproblems.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
»·¾³¹«ÒæËßËÏ£»
·¨Ôº£»
¶¯Á¦»úÖÆ£»
ȱÏÝ£»
ÖØËÜ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
environm entalpublic interestlitigation£»
court£»
dynamic mechanism£»
defect£»
remodeling£»
19¡¢ÂÛ¼ÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛÔÚÃñÊÂËßËÏ˾·¨Êµ¼ùÖеÄÊÊÓÃµË»Ô»Ô £¨¹ðÁÖµç×ӿƼ¼´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¼ÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛÔÚÎÒ¹úÃñÊÂËßËÏÖд¦ÔÚÀíÂÛÉϵÄÖØÊÓÓëÁ¢·¨ÉϵÄÇáÊÓ¡¢Êµ¼ùÖеÄÄ®ÊÓÖ®ÞÏÞξ³µØ¡£´«Í³·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯µÄȱ·¦¡¢·¨ÂɼÌÊÜÀúÊ·µÄÅų⡢Êг¡¾¼Ã²»·¢´ïºÍְȨÖ÷ÒåËßËÏģʽµÄÖÆÔ¼¡¢Ë¾·¨È¨ÍþÐÔµÄȱʧ¡¢·¨¹Ù·¨ÂÉËØÖʺÍÖ°ÒµµÀµÂµÄÓ°ÏìÊǼÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛÔÚÃñÊÂËßËÏ˾·¨Êµ¼ùÖÐÊÊÓôæÔÚÀ§¾³µÄÔÒò¡£ÎªÁ˰ÚÍѼÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛÔÚÃñÊÂËßËÏ˾·¨Êµ¼ùÖÐÊÊÓôæÔÚµÄÀ§¾³,Ó¦µ±ÔÚ˼Ïë²ãÃæÉÏÊ÷Á¢¼ÈÅÐÁ¦µÄ¹ÛÄî,½øÒ»²½É¼ÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÄîµÄÑо¿,ÔÚÁ¢·¨ÉÏÈ«Ãæ¡¢ÕýÈ·µØÌåÏÖ¼ÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛ,¼ÓÇ¿¶Ôµ±ÊÂÈ˵ijÌÐò±£ÕÏ,É˾·¨ÌåÖÆ¸Ä¸ïÒÔÔöǿ˾·¨È¨ÍþÐÔ,´óÁ¦Ìá¸ß·¨¹ÙµÄ·¨ÂÉËØÖʺÍÖ°ÒµµÀµÂË®×¼¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ The theory ofres judicata in ourcivilaction is in an embarrassing stituation thatitis paid attention to in theory while itis neglected in legislation and ignored in practice. The reasons are as following:the lack oftraditionallegalculture,the exclusion of the law history,the constraints of the undeveloped market economy and ex officio litigation system ,the lack ofjudicialauthority,the effectofjudges¡¯legal ethics and professionalethics. In orderto getrid ofthe em barrassing situation ofresjudicata theory,we should setthe concept of res judicata in the ideological level to further deepen the relevant research,let the theory ofresjudicata reflected in the legislation fully and correetly,strengthen the proceduralsafeguards to the parties,deepen judicial reform to strengthen the judicial authority,and greatly enhance the judges¡¯ legaland professionalethics.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
¼ÈÅÐÁ¦ÀíÂÛ£»
ÃñÊÂËßËÏ£»
˾·¨ÊÊÓã»
¡¾Key words¡¿
theory of res judicata£»
civilaction£»
judicial application£»
20¡¢´úλȨËßËÏÖÐÕ®ÎñÈËÈ¨Òæ±£»¤Ç³ÎöÍõ³¬£¨ÇػʵºÖ°Òµ¼¼ÊõѧԺ£©;½ªÈðÔÆ £¨Ê¯¼Òׯ»úе»¯²½±øÑ§ÔºÕþÖÎÀíÂÛÊÒ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ´úλȨ×÷ΪծµÄ±£È«ÖƶÈÖ®Ò»,ÆäÉèÁ¢µÄÄ¿µÄÔÚÓÚ¶½´ÙÕ®ÎñÈË»ý¼«×·Ë÷ÆäÓµÓеÄծȨ,ÒÔά»¤Õ®È¨È˵ÄÀûÒæ¡£ÎÒ¹úµÄ´úÎ»È¨ÖÆ¶ÈÔÚά»¤Õ®È¨ÈËÀûÒæµÄͬʱ,ÔÚÁ¢·¨ÉÏÈ´ºöÂÔÁËÕ®ÎñÈ˵ÄÀûÒæ±£»¤¡£±ØÐë´Ó¶à¸ö²ãÃæÐ޸ĺÍÍêÉÆ´úÎ»È¨ÖÆ¶È,ÒÔÆÚ´ïµ½ÔÚά»¤Õ®È¨ÈËÀûÒæµÄͬʱ,Òà·ÀÖ¹Ëðº¦Õ®ÎñÈËÀûÒæ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Subrogation as one of the debt security system s is to urge the debtors set up their own positive claim s of recourse to safeguard the interests ofcreditors. Our subrogation system is also established for this purpose.However,it neglects in legislation to protectthe interests of the debtors.We should im prove the subrogation system to wellprotectthe interests of the creditors,and to protectthe interests ofthe debtors as well.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ծȨÈË£»
Õ®ÎñÈË£»
´úλȨ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
creditor£»
debtor£»
subrogation£»
21¡¢Éç»áÕûºÏÓëÈËÃñ·¨Í¥µÄ¹¦Äܶ¨Î»ÁõÐÂÐÇ£¨Î÷ÄÏÕþ·¨´óѧÐÐÕþ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ëæ×ÅÏç´åÉç»áתÐÍ,ÏçÃñÓë¹ú¼Ò¡¢¼ÒÍ¥¡¢´«Í³¹æ·¶Ö®¼äµÄŦ´øÔçÒÑËÉи,¸öÈ˶ÔÉç»á±£ÓеÄÍŽáÇé¸ÐºÍµÀµÂÔðÈθÐËæÖ®µ±¡,Ïç´åÉç»áµÄÕûºÏÎÊÌ⽫ԽÀ´Ô½Í»³ö¡£ÈËÃñ·¨Í¥µÄ˾·¨ÔË×÷ÔÚÐÞ¸´¹ú¼ÒÓëÏçÃñÖ®¼äµÄ¹ØÏµ,¼ÓÇ¿Éç»áÕûºÏ·½ÃæµÄ¹¦ÄÜÔ½À´Ô½ÖØÒª¡£ËäÈ»²»ÉÙÑо¿¶ÔÈËÃñ·¨Í¥Äܶ¯µÄ¡¢±ãÃñµÄ˾·¨ÔËÐÐģʽ³Ö·ñ¶¨Ì¬¶È,µ«ÈôÁ¢×ãÓÚÕûÌå·ÖÎöµÄ·½·¨ÓëÊÓ½Ç,´ÓÈËÃñ·¨Í¥¶ÔÏç´åÉç»áÕûºÏµÄ¹¦ÄÜÒâÒå³ö·¢È´¿ÉÒÔ·¢ÏÖ,ÕâÆäʵÊÇÈËÃñ·¨Í¥µÄ¹¦ÄÜÐÔ±ØÒªÌõ¼þ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ In the process ofsocialtransform ation,the link which between the villagers and the state,or between the villagers and fam ilies,or between the villagers and the traditional norm s has slack. As the em otional and moral responsibility indifference,the integration problem of rural community will become more and more prom inent. In the repairing the relationship between the state and the villagers,and m aintaining the socialidentity and strengthening socialintegration, the role and function of people¡¯s court are m ore and m ore im portant. Although many research don¡¯t agree with the judicialway ofpeople¡¯s court,based on the integral analysis method and the perspective,we found the active judicial way is the functional essentials of people¡¯s court from itproceeding on rural social integration functions.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Éç»áÕûºÏ£»
ÈËÃñ·¨Í¥£»
¹¦ÄÜ£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
socialintegration£»
people¡¯s court£»
function£»
22¡¢ÈË´ó"ÉóÒéÒâ¼û"Û»Òé³Â½ðÓñ £¨ºÓ±±Ê¡ÈË´ó³£Î¯»á£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÌýÈ¡ºÍÉóÒé"Ò»¸®Á½Ôº"רÏ×÷±¨¸æ¡¢Ö´·¨¼ì²éÊǸ÷¼¶ÈË´ó³£Î¯»á³£ÓõÄÖ÷Òª¼à¶½ÐÎʽ¡£Ëæ×Å¡¶¼à¶½·¨¡·ºÍ¡¶ºÓ±±Ê¡ÊµÊ©©‚¼à¶½·¨©ƒ°ì·¨¡·µÄʵʩ,ÌýÈ¡±¨¸æ¡¢Ö´·¨¼ì²é¡úÌá³öÉóÒéÒâ¼û¡ú"Ò»¸®Á½Ôº"Ñо¿´¦Àí¡ú±¨¸æ´¦ÀíÇé¿ö¡úÏòÉç»á¹«²¼,Öð½¥ÐγÉÁËÒ»¸ö¹¤×÷±ÕºÏ·¾¶¡£ÉóÒéÒâ¼ûÔ½À´Ô½¶àµÄʹÓÃ,ÒѳÉΪÈË´ó³£Î¯»á×ÛºÏÔËÓüලÐÎʽµÄÓлú×é³É²¿·Ö,³ÉΪ"Ò»¸®Á½Ôº"×öºÃÕû¸Ä¹¤×÷µÄÖ÷ÒªÒÀ¾Ý¡£ÖØÊÓÀíÐÔ˼¿¼,̽Îö·¨¶¨º¬Òå,ÕýÈ·ÔËÓú͹淶"Ò»¸®Á½Ôº"Ñо¿´¦ÀíÉóÒéÒâ¼û,¶ÔÓÚ²»¶ÏÌá¸ß¼à¶½ÖÊÁ¿,ÔöÇ¿Õû¸ÄЧ¹û,ÏÔµÃÊ®·Ö±ØÒª¡£
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ÉóÒéÒâ¼û£»
׫д½»°ì£»
Ñо¿´¦Àí£»
×¢ÒâÎÊÌ⣻
23¡¢×·Ñ°¶Ô³å»ù½ð¼à¹Ü·¨ÖÆÂ·¾¶¡ª¡ªæÓ±äÓëÆÀÊö·ï½¨¾ü £¨Ç廪´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¶Ô³å»ù½ðÊÇÃÀ¹ú"·ÇÒøÐнðÈÚÌåϵ"µÄÖØÒª×é³É²¿·ÖÖ®Ò»,Æä³¤ÆÚ´æÔÚÓÚÃÀ¹úµÄ½ðÈÚÊг¡ÖÐ,²¢ÇÒ³ÊÏÖ³ö²»¶Ï·¢Õ¹×³´óµÄÇ÷ÊÆ,¾¡¹ÜÃÀ¹úÏà¹Ø½ðÈÚ·¨ÖÆÒ»Ö±ÔÚѰÇó½ðÈÚ¼à¹ÜÓë½ðÈÚ´´ÐÂÖ®¼äµÄƽºâ,µ«ÔÚÃÀ¹ú½ðÈÚ»ìÒµ¾ÓªÄ£Ê½ÏÂ,¶Ô¶Ô³å»ù½ð¼à¹ÜµÄ©¶´½«¿ÉÄÜÒý·¢"ϵͳÐÔ·çÏÕ",ÓÈÆäÊǽðÈÚΣ»úµÄ³öÏÖ¸ü¼Ó¼á¶¨ÁËÁ¢·¨Õߺͼà¹ÜÕß±ØÐë²ÉÈ¡´ëÊ©Ìî²¹ÕâÒ»¼à¹Ü©¶´¡£¡¶¶àµÃ-¸¥À¼¿Ë·¨°¸¡·¶Ô¶Ô³å»ù½ðµÈ˽ļ»ù½ðµÄ¼à¹Ü½øÐÐÁËÁ¢·¨¸Ä¸ï,²ÉÈ¡ÁËÏàÓ¦µÄ¼à¹Ü´ëÊ©¡£×·Ñ°ÃÀ¹ú¹ØÓÚ¶Ô³å»ù½ð¼à¹Ü·¨ÖƸĸïÀú³Ì,Æä³ä·Ö·´Ó³Á˽ðÈÚÁ¢·¨ÖÐ×ÔÓÉ¡¢°²È«¡¢¹«Æ½¡¢Ð§Âʵȷ¨ÂɼÛÖµµÄ¶¯Ì¬²©ÞÄ¡£
¡¾Abstract¡¿ Hedge fund is one of the mostim portantparts of the "non-bank financialsystem "in the U .S. With the development of hedge fund,the financial regulators wantto seek a balance between financialregulation and financialinnovation in financial regulation law. Because the U .S. chooses the model of financial mixed operation,the regulation gap of hedge fund will cause the "system atic risk". Now under the background offinancialcrisis,the legislator and regulator make up their minds to take measures to fill this gap. The related reforms of Dodd-Frank Acttighten the supervision over the hedge fund. Looking back the reform progress of hedge fund regulation,we will find this progress is a dynam ic game about the value of freedom ,security,justice and efficiency in the financiallaw.
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
¶Ô³å»ù½ð£»
ϵͳÐÔ·çÏÕ£»
½ðÈÚ¼à¹Ü£»
¡¶¶àµÃ-¸¥À¼¿Ë·¨°¸¡·£»
¡¾Key words¡¿
hedge fund£»
system atic risk£»
financialregulation£»
Dodd-Frank Act£»
24¡¢Ì°Îۻ߸·¸×ïËÀÐÌÖÆ¶ÈÕùÒéÎÊÌâÑо¿Àîì¿ £¨ºÓ±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ¹ÜÀíѧԺ£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ËÀÐÌ×÷ΪÐÌ·£ÌåϵÖÐ×îÑÏÀ÷µÄÒ»ÖÖÖÆ¶È,¶ÔÖйú¸÷¸öÀúʷʱÆÚµÄÕþÖΡ¢¾¼ÃºÍÉç»á¶¼²úÉúÁËÖØÒªÓ°Ï졣̰Îۻ߸·¸×ï×÷ΪһÖÖÊÀ½çÏÖÏó,ÔÚµ±½ñÖйúÒýÆð¸ß¶È¹Ø×¢ºÍÆÕ±éÉùÌÖ¡£¶Ôµ±Ç°ÐÎÊÆÏÂ̰Îۻ߸·¸×ïËÀÐÌÖÆ¶ÈµÄ´æ·Ï¡¢¶Ô̰Îۻ߸·¸×ï"ËÀ»º"µÄÊÊÓõÈÕùÒéÎÊÌâ½øÐÐϵͳÑо¿ºÍÀíÐÔ˼¿¼¡£
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
̰Îۻ߸£»
ËÀÐÌÖÆ¶È£»
ÕùÒ飻
25¡¢Å©Ãñ¹¤ÀÍ×ʾÀ·×˾·¨¾È¼ÃµÄÀ§¾³ÓëÆÆ½â¡ª¡ª¼ì²ì»ú¹ØÖ§³ÖÆðËßµÄÊӽDzܹú»ª£¨Õã½Ê¡Í©ÏçÊÐÈËÃñ¼ì²ìÔº£©;ÌÕ²®½ø £¨ÄϾ©´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Å©Ãñ¹¤ÊÇÎÒ¹úÉç»áתÐ͹ý³ÌÖгöÏÖµÄÌØÊâȺÌå,ÓÉÓÚÆä×ÔÉíºÍÉç»áµÄÔÒòµ¼ÖÂÆäÀûÒæ¸üÒ×ÊÜÇÖº¦,¶ø·ÇÖÆ¶È»¯µÄ˽Á¦¾È¼ÃÍùÍù¹¹³ÉÉç»á·çÏÕµÄÖØÒªÀ´Ô´¡£Í¨¹ýÖ§³ÖÆðËßÖÆ¶È½«ÆäȨÀû¾È¼ÃÄÉÈëÕýµ±»¯³ÌÐòÓÐÀûÓÚÏû³ý·çÏյIJ»È·¶¨ÐÔ¡£¼ì²ì»ú¹Ø¶ÔÅ©Ãñ¹¤Ö§³ÖÆðËßÓ¦ÔÚ³ä·Ö×ðÖØË½È¨×ÔÖλù´¡ÉÏ,×ñѺϷ¨¡¢Ç«ÒÖºÍÓÐÏÞÔÔò,¼ì²ì»ú¹ØÖ§³ÖÆðËߵݸ¼þ·¶Î§ÎªÅ©Ãñ¹¤ÒòΪÀͶ¯¹ØÏµ¶ø²úÉúʵ¼ÊË𺦡£ÔÚ¶ÔÅ©Ãñ¹¤Ö§³ÖÆðË߻ÖÐ,¼ì²ì»ú¹Ø¼æ¾ßËßËϳÌÐò²ÎÓëÕߺͷ¨ÂɼලÕßµÄË«ÖØµØÎ»,ÏàÓ¦µØ¾ßÓÐÁ¢°¸È¨¡¢ÊÕ¼¯Ö¤¾ÝȨ¡¢Ìá³öÖ§³ÖÆðËßÒâ¼ûȨ¡¢³öϯ·¨Í¥È¨¡¢¶ÔÉóÅлÌá³öÒâ¼ûȨºÍ¿¹ËßȨµÈְȨ¡£
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
Å©Ãñ¹¤£»
Ö§³ÖÆðËߣ»
Éç»áȨÀû£»
¼ì²ì»ú¹Ø£»
26¡¢ÂÛ¼ì²ì¹Ù³äµ±ÐÌʺͽâµ÷½âÈ˽ÇÉ«µÄÀíÐÔ˼¿¼Ç®²ý·ò£¨Õã½Ê¡ÉÜÐËÊÐÔ½³ÇÇøÈËÃñ¼ì²ìÔº£©;Åíлª £¨Õã½Ê¡ÉÜÐËÊÐÈËÃñ¼ì²ìÔº£© ¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ µ÷½âÈ˽ÇÉ«µÄÑ¡ÔñÖ±½ÓÓ°ÏìÐÌʺͽâģʽ¡£ÎÒ¹ú·¨Ñ§ÀíÂÛ½çÇ¿µ÷ÓÉÉçÇøµÈÃñ¼ä×éÖ¯³Ðµ£ÐÌʺͽâµ÷½âÈË,¼ì²ìʵ¼ùÖÐÈ´³öÏÖ¼ì²ì¹ÙÖ±½Óµ÷½â¡¢Î¯ÍÐÈËÃñµ÷½âÔ±µ÷½âºÍµ±ÊÂÈË×ÔÐкͽâµÈ¶àÔª»¯Ä£Ê½¡£Í¨¹ý¶ÔÊÀ½ç¸÷¹úÐÌʺͽâµ÷½âÈ˽ÇÉ«¶¨Î»µÄ±È½Ï·ÖÎö,ÒÔ¼°¶Ôµ±Ç°ÎÒ¹úÐÌʺͽâµÄʵ֤·ÖÎö,¼ì²ì¹ÙÖ±½Ó³äµ±ÐÌʺͽâµ÷½âÈËÊÇÒ»ÖÖÀíÐÔÑ¡Ôñ¡£
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
ÐÌʺͽ⣻
µ÷½âÈ˽ÇÉ«£»
ÀíÐÔ˼¿¼£»
27¡¢»ù²ã¼ì²ìÊÒ¿ªÕ¹ÉçÇø½ÃÕý¼ì²ì¹¤×÷³õ̽¡ª¡ªÒÔÕã½Ê¡ºþÖÝÊг¤ÐËÏØÈËÃñ¼ì²ìÔºµÄ̽Ë÷ʵ¼ùΪÀýÖìΪѧ;¹ËºÆ £¨Õã½Ê¡ºþÖÝÊг¤ÐËÏØÈËÃñ¼ì²ìÔº£©¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ÉçÇø½ÃÕý×÷ΪÐÂÐ͵ÄÐÌ·£Ö´Ðз½Ê½ºÍÐÐΪ½ÃÖÎģʽ,±ØÐëÓÉÏçÕò½ÖµÀµÈ»ù²ãÉçÇø½ÃÕý×éÖ¯ÒÔÌù½ü±»Ö´ÐÐÈËÉú²úÉú»îµÄ·½Ê½¿ªÕ¹,Õâ¾Í±ØÈ»ÒªÇóÏàÓ¦µÄ¼ì²ì¼à¶½¹¤×÷Ò²ÒªËæÖ®ÉîÈë»ù²ã¡£´ÓÀíÂÛºÍʵ¼ù³ö·¢,²ûÊö»ù²ã¼ì²ìÊÒµÄÉèÁ¢¶ÔÍÆ½øÉçÇø½ÃÕý¼ì²ì¹¤×÷µÄÒâÒå¡£
¡¾¹Ø¼ü´Ê¡¿
»ù²ã¼ì²ìÊÒ£»
ÉçÇø½ÃÕý£»
·¨Âɼල£»
ÈÕÆÚ£º2012-7-26 14:34:14 | ¹Ø±Õ | ·ÖÏíµ½£º